» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
Sony Ericsson Cyber-Shot C905, 8.1 MegaPixel Camera
Sony Ericsson Cyber-Shot C905, 8.1 MegaPixel Camera
|
|
Jun 16 2008, 04:01 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,173 posts Joined: Aug 2006 From: Kuala Lumpur |
Some live pictures.
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « |
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 16 2008, 10:33 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,173 posts Joined: Aug 2006 From: Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(angelayen @ Jun 16 2008, 10:32 PM) Not much. The C905 would be the only high-end phone, I think.Edit: Just found out that there will be the S302, F305, P10, C905 and probably G702. This post has been edited by G-Izzat: Jun 17 2008, 03:04 AM |
|
|
Jun 17 2008, 10:27 AM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,173 posts Joined: Aug 2006 From: Kuala Lumpur |
To have more features, size have to be sacrificed.
Anyways, some have said that the thickness of it is because of the xenon flash. The xenon flash capacitor needs lots of space. |
|
|
Jun 17 2008, 07:38 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,173 posts Joined: Aug 2006 From: Kuala Lumpur |
Pictures taken with the C905.
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « This post has been edited by G-Izzat: Jun 17 2008, 08:10 PM |
|
|
Jun 17 2008, 11:43 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,173 posts Joined: Aug 2006 From: Kuala Lumpur |
A few more.
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « |
|
|
Jun 18 2008, 12:35 AM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,173 posts Joined: Aug 2006 From: Kuala Lumpur |
Check out the videos below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 19 2008, 03:04 AM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,173 posts Joined: Aug 2006 From: Kuala Lumpur |
I was just about to post that, squall.
Seems like everyone who have tried the C905 seems happy with it. |
|
|
Jun 19 2008, 03:33 AM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,173 posts Joined: Aug 2006 From: Kuala Lumpur |
I believe this phone has the "WOAH" factor. This is simply because it's not a smartphone like the N-series from Nokia or the Windows Mobile phone.
It has the features of a smartphone (Wi-Fi, GPS) eventhough it is just a normal feature phone. But, this is just my opinion. This post has been edited by G-Izzat: Jun 19 2008, 03:34 AM |
|
|
Jun 19 2008, 04:04 AM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,173 posts Joined: Aug 2006 From: Kuala Lumpur |
Well, I've heard that there's a possibility that it will have VGA recording. I do hope that's true.
|
|
|
Jun 20 2008, 11:58 AM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,173 posts Joined: Aug 2006 From: Kuala Lumpur |
Good AND expensive.
|
|
|
Jun 20 2008, 09:50 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,173 posts Joined: Aug 2006 From: Kuala Lumpur |
Good for you.
|
|
|
Jun 21 2008, 06:14 AM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,173 posts Joined: Aug 2006 From: Kuala Lumpur |
It will be released in October, I think. The C902 is currently being released here and it's not the flagship for Sony Ericsson this year so I don't think the C905 would affect the C902's sales.
|
|
|
Jun 21 2008, 03:53 PM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,173 posts Joined: Aug 2006 From: Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(iRonTech @ Jun 21 2008, 03:45 PM) I really don't think the C902 is the flagship since it doesn't have the xenon flash.Well, if it's gonna be C907, then it will be in a different form-factor. If there is a succesor for the C905, it will be C915. 2 is for candybar. 5 is for slides. |
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 21 2008, 08:16 PM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,173 posts Joined: Aug 2006 From: Kuala Lumpur |
Yeah, it doesn't matter to me as well. I'm going for the C902.
And yeah, that is how they will name their phones from now on. |
|
|
Jun 21 2008, 09:26 PM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,173 posts Joined: Aug 2006 From: Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(nicks @ Jun 21 2008, 08:31 PM) wah... G-Izzat got money edy, huhuh.. at the moment, i cant afford it. but i kinda like the looks of C702. hehe Haha, don't have the money yet. Still trying to save money for it. And probably I'll be selling my K850. The C702 is a good phone. The price is reasonable as well for its features. |
|
|
Jun 22 2008, 01:23 AM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,173 posts Joined: Aug 2006 From: Kuala Lumpur |
Sometimes, a slider is much better because you can fit much more in it. Such as a bigger screen.
I guess they really wanted the C905 to look just like a digital camera. This post has been edited by G-Izzat: Jun 22 2008, 01:23 AM |
|
|
Jun 27 2008, 08:19 AM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,173 posts Joined: Aug 2006 From: Kuala Lumpur |
Have faith.
Even Nokia's using Samsung lens. |
|
|
Jul 28 2008, 02:35 AM
Return to original view | Post
#18
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,173 posts Joined: Aug 2006 From: Kuala Lumpur |
Probably she saw the C902.
|
|
|
Aug 10 2008, 12:17 PM
Return to original view | Post
#19
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,173 posts Joined: Aug 2006 From: Kuala Lumpur |
|
|
|
Sep 10 2008, 06:04 AM
Return to original view | Post
#20
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,173 posts Joined: Aug 2006 From: Kuala Lumpur |
Why is G810 better than this?
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0366sec
0.53
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 28th November 2025 - 02:28 AM |