QUOTE(aodhwulfe @ May 8 2012, 02:42 PM)
Hey, thanks for the wish. But what about quality? Say among the 4 direct applications unis? All I've heard so far are their marketing pitches. Any pros and cons about the quality? Anyone?
Since I did not study in any of the mentioned law schools, I speak only of their reputation.
Cardiff, Liverpool and Hull are traditional and solid law schools. Arguably Reading can now be added to this category.
Hertfordshire is a dump, and Aber not very much better. Northumbria is upcoming, but 'everyone' goes there.
Reputation is a gauge of research quality; famous institutions are mostly research intensive institutions. While a good researcher may not be a brilliant teacher (and I must say this is the minority situation), a good teacher who also conducts quality research can offer so much more than one who merely teaches. Surely you want to hear for yourself what Treitel has to say about Contract and what Penner has to say about Trust? I assure you that such experiences are invaluable.
Now I'm not saying that people who graduate from the second list are hopeless. There are many successful instances. It takes more than the law school to produce successful people. But at times, eg when applying to highly competitive positions, reputation of the institution may matter.
You don't just choose Freedonia University over Harvard just because the former is cheaper, unless of course if your financial position does not allow for a choice. The brand follows you for life. Think about it.
This post has been edited by academiclawyer: May 8 2012, 04:08 PM