QUOTE(blitz3r @ Sep 23 2009, 10:25 PM)
hey hi guys.....
im currently sitting for my Alevels n will b graduating tis comin June i hav some questions about studying law
hope u all can plz help resolve my dilemma.... haha
firstly,
wats the main difference between going for an external degree lik uni of London at atc, brickfields..... n an internal one lik twinning
teaching wise n quality of education
secondly,
for example HELP, their law course is call UK transfer where else taylors's is refered to twinning can u plz explain d pro n cons (quality of teaching, syllabus, etc....)
thirdly,
is there a much bigger advantage of taking a 1+2 course compared to a 2+1..... taking in consideration of spending much more.......
fourthly,
does a LLM serve much purpose here in Malaysia... cuz by looking around many legal counsels only holding LLb are doing very well whereas LLm holders seem to only hav d added advantage of being a lecturer...(correct me if im wrong)
currently doing science stream in combridge Alvls... recently realised not so interested in the science field as a profession.....
THX alot in advance guys...........

basically...imho
1) the main difference btw an ext llb and internal course is that in the ext UOL LLB, it is a 100% exam based qualification whereas internal programmes consider attendance, assignments etc in addition to exams. The law is primarily the same, and the quality of education varies with the institute and eventual university. The UOL Ext LLB can be done at an institute or by self studying, it is quite difficult to score since everything boils down to those 4 days a year when your exams are. Furthermore you will need a min 2:2 in order to practice whereas for internal progs (most or all?) a third class honours will suffice.
Teaching wise, for an ext prog, you dun really need to go for classes as stated, assignments and mock exams are not mandatory. What i did was to skip a whole lot of classes (not advisable) but attend revision diligently 2 or so mths before the main exams. You cant really do the same for internal progs as they may have an attendance requirement...
2) in a Uk transfer programme or a DTP (Degree Transfer Programme) you sit for internal exams at HELP etc and then apply for transfer to their affiliated unis. Whereas in the Taylors Twinning Prog, you are linked to Reading from the very start. The pros of the Taylors prog, is that if you can get in, you are already with Reading. The pros of a DTP is that you have a choice and the Pre U requirements of some of the Unis is lower than for Taylor's twinning prog...but let say for example you want to head to Cardiff as they also offer the BVC, then if you meet their requirements, the DTP would be a better choice...
3) the exposure is an advantage tho I dun really see any pros when you actually practice...I personally dun see it to be cost effective to spend another 80k or so to do a 1+2 but if you can afford it, most ppl would want to since there's a proper campus lifestyle, 2 years instead of 1 so you can adapt better...and some unis (correct me if im wrong) only consider your year (s) spent in the UK towards your hons classification, so a 2+1 might be stressful in the UK...
4) LLM is mainly a knowledge based qualification. Usually only do it if you are lecturing or giving training, but it doesn't serve much purpose and is not very useful otherwise. Doing a masters in another field like an MBA may be a better choice...as being a lawyer requires alot of marketing oneself and presentation abilities (esp if you intend to open your own firm, an MBA may be more useful in building your business)...