my second time here. this time i had my tele lens so my shots are a lil bit different from the previous ones and also i tried a different approach...comment on them please..thanks..

1.


2.


3.


4.


5.


6.


7.


8.


9.


thanks for viewing.. comets comments

This post has been edited by orenzai: May 27 2008, 12:21 PM

i like #2
d bokeh of 55-200 just great...

er... no 2 was using the kitlens

haha...my bad

i like 3............ snail so cute xD

number 2, awesome!!!

love the shots. #5 is the only one i didn't quite like, donno what da heck it is.

#6 is nicer than #8. subject wise la. composition idea is same. i believe what made #6 better is the difference in colors (leaf vs water) and the generally nicer pattern.

favourite among the lost probably would be #3, it shows the snail having an uphill climb.

#4 is idea is there. wonder if it's possible to go nearer.

#2 is nice, i wish the camera go back a bit and focus on more mushrooms.

*other shots not commented, meaning i find them nice to see *

Number 6 is awesome.

Very good shots, and #3 is my fav.

Good use of the web as well

I like #3 and #7

good job You are one of the better photographers here

thanks

noted...thank you

thanks...

your the first t say that... thanks...will try to improve...

Good work!! #2 and #6 gets my vote for sure! At this rate unnecessary to change to D80 replacement? Use the money buy 70-200 f2.8!!!

haha...my shots so so only... and the AF is killing me and burning a hole in my pocket...maybe dun wan change body now lor

Orenzai, DOF is too shallow for the type of composition that you were making. Tele lens is good only if it's taken with a smaller aperture to maximize the DOF and increase the detail. Of course tripod is a must to use a small aperture. A slight vibration will cause the whole image to be blur, and I'm sure you can see that at 100% crop.

You need to save for a macro lens.

er..which shot you referring to DOF too shallow?

200mm for 55-200 since good

1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8.

for no 123, if i take a shot with a smaller aperture wont the background be distracting?

Good question. No doubt larger aperture can cause the BG to be OOF more, but only marginally. I have never achieved satisfactory result by opening up aperture with a busy BG. So compose carefully is the way to go. If the BG looks busy in your view finder, choose another angle.

thanks very much for the comment... will do next time