Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Airasia, Airasia

views
     
PiggyAikz
post Aug 10 2011, 04:33 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
193 posts

Joined: Mar 2005


Actually the share swap is between the major shareholders of MAS and Khazanah. For the minority shareholders there arent any effect at all besides maybe concerns that Tan Sri Tony now has to split his time managing two airlines instead of one.
PiggyAikz
post Aug 11 2011, 09:04 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
193 posts

Joined: Mar 2005


QUOTE(escargo75 @ Aug 11 2011, 02:04 AM)
Really cannot understand all this sandiwara. Why AA want to buy into MAS since it always making lost unless you want to telan this company, right? But MAS will exist as long as BN still rule at all cost.
*
TF and gang bought AA a then lost making airliner from DRB-Hicom. So back then TF did telan the lost making AA and see where is AA now smile.gif
PiggyAikz
post Aug 11 2011, 05:42 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
193 posts

Joined: Mar 2005


QUOTE(firee818 @ Aug 11 2011, 02:21 PM)
Benefiary

1) Tony
He has control over AA & MAS, now he is a superstar. So, he has the larger voice to get certain "visa" to be grant by gov't which previously could not (last time no power). e.g. Airport issues.  I think he will award Tan Sri title soon. Now, Tony is a gov't crony.

2) Government
Indirectly, gov't still has a chance to rescue MAS.

3) Investor
Investor of AA and MAS, benefit from monopoly biz and thus profitable account.
Loser
You and me who buy air-line tickets as monopoly of air-line market emerge.
*
1) He will not be awarded Tan Sri title soon. He is already in fact Tan Sri Tony F. MAS does not own airports. MAHB owns airports. So by AA and MAS having the same major shareholders it will not affect any "airport issues" directly. Indirectly however, Khazanah being a common shareholder of AA, MAS and MAHB might have influence on "airport issues" to the advantage of AA.

2) Government or not. It will be a herculean task for TF to turn around MAS. If he succeeds he is one hell of a magician.

3) AA and MAS competes on different markets. AA has branded itself a low cost carrier while MAS is a premium airliner. Competitions for AA would perhaps be Tiger Airways and JetStar while competition for MAS would be Singapore Airlines and Emirates. To note however, MAS also has Fireflyz which is branded as MAS's low cost carrier franchise. AA and Fireflyz might be condescending but if not wrong only a few routes "cross" paths. For consumers, AA would still offer economical alternatives to travel compared to flying full fledged premium airlines. Sole purpose or business model for AA is to offer economical alternatives to travel by air if its fares are cheaper by a significant premium to MAS or any other premium airlines i think we as consumers are getting our bargains to travel economically. As for MAS, if TF is indeed successful in his herculean task then you and I who travel full fledged carriers will then get our monies worth. We will get better and improved services for the same price we pay today.

If you ask me... win win for all. there might be concerns that AA's gearing is very high. But that is a separate issue altogether and has nothing to do with this share swap (which has nothing to do with AA or MAS since its at shareholder level not company level). Airliners are capex intensive not surprising to have high gearing. but doubts do arise if AA is able to manage its high gearing if the high gearing is manageable and AA is able to improve its earnings i think the business is sustainable.

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0350sec    0.40    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 9th December 2025 - 02:36 PM