So there I was, being the shutter to capture all the moments.
#1

#2

#3

#4

#5

#6

#7

I hope you guys enjoy the photos.
This post has been edited by goldfries: May 25 2008, 02:48 AM
newbie (goldfries) shoot wedding......, added 6 more shots
|
|
May 22 2008, 02:45 AM, updated 18y ago
Show posts by this member only | Post
#1
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
A long-time friend (the guy) and my sister-in-law got married recently.......
So there I was, being the shutter to capture all the moments. #1 ![]() #2 ![]() #3 ![]() #4 ![]() #5 ![]() #6 ![]() #7 ![]() I hope you guys enjoy the photos. This post has been edited by goldfries: May 25 2008, 02:48 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
May 22 2008, 02:47 AM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#2
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
#8
![]() #9 ![]() #10 ![]() #11 ![]() #12 ![]() #13 ![]() Yes, END here. Praises, Criticisms, Comments - all are welcome. Later when I have time, I'll try to get more pics up........... the WEDDING DINNER. *don't expect so much from me la k* This post has been edited by goldfries: May 25 2008, 02:47 AM |
|
|
May 22 2008, 02:50 AM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,648 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: PJ, Malaysia |
What bride in her right mind would paint her nails like that for her wedding???
|
|
|
May 22 2008, 02:52 AM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#4
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
LOL. i also donno. i memang puzzled too.
but respect people's decision la. criticize the photographer if you want la, no need to criticize the people. |
|
|
May 22 2008, 02:57 AM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
237 posts Joined: Nov 2005 From: Ipoh & Cheras |
bro goldfries,
what equipment u use..? flash etc... care to share.. btw,nice pics... like ur compo style.. This post has been edited by hr_elie: May 22 2008, 02:58 AM |
|
|
May 22 2008, 03:21 AM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
857 posts Joined: Feb 2007 |
He got a very wide lens......diffused flash.This i can see only.....noob me
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 22 2008, 03:22 AM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,410 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: MLK |
Sigma 10-20 & Sigma 24-70. /me runs
|
|
|
May 22 2008, 03:47 AM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,889 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: Kelana Jaya |
Nice composition but you didn't number your pics, hard to give comment
The shots in the car, should have asked the guy to unbutton the coat This post has been edited by zio: May 22 2008, 11:50 AM |
|
|
May 22 2008, 06:02 AM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,446 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
#1 and #7 is good. For the 7 one, if csm get more of the reflection would be better. Any shots of (only) the wedding dress or shoes?
|
|
|
May 22 2008, 09:40 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
202 posts Joined: Oct 2006 From: 苏格兰场 |
nice composition!! did u use any photoshop to touch-up???
|
|
|
May 22 2008, 09:49 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,793 posts Joined: Feb 2005 From: Command & Conquer 3 |
Er... not bad... Very Canon style also...
Here I encourage any couple try to marry as early as possible... Younger mean better looking, also mean better pictures! |
|
|
May 22 2008, 11:48 AM
|
|
Elite
7,826 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(zio @ May 22 2008, 03:47 AM) Nice composition but you number your pics, hard to give comment Totally agree with you on this. The shots in the car, should have asked the guy to unbutton the coat I also think that the wide angle shots for some scenes include too many things (a.k.a distractions) especially like those when she is in the room doing her makeup. |
|
|
May 22 2008, 01:18 PM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(hr_elie @ May 22 2008, 02:57 AM) thx. equipment details? later la. QUOTE(Oxburg @ May 22 2008, 03:21 AM) hehe. flash only used in 3 of the photos.QUOTE(Joseph Hahn @ May 22 2008, 03:22 AM) QUOTE(zio @ May 22 2008, 03:47 AM) Nice composition but you didn't number your pics, hard to give comment added QUOTE(zio @ May 22 2008, 03:47 AM) The shots in the car, should have asked the guy to unbutton the coat oh, that time i tell you la. so rush on everything, car was moving blabalbalbal. it wasn't a planned bridal house shot. long story la. to snap them also i have to do acrobatics already. QUOTE(myjunk @ May 22 2008, 06:02 AM) #1 and #7 is good. For the 7 one, if csm get more of the reflection would be better. Any shots of (only) the wedding dress or shoes? no chance. i'm not at a luxury of getting them to pose and finding this and that because things that day were hectic. QUOTE(yitbunzai @ May 22 2008, 09:40 AM) i snapped in RAW, most shots not much WB change. resize, sharpen, watermark and that's it. QUOTE(Mavik @ May 22 2008, 11:48 AM) Totally agree with you on this. about the coat? ahh explained. QUOTE(Mavik @ May 22 2008, 11:48 AM) I also think that the wide angle shots for some scenes include too many things (a.k.a distractions) especially like those when she is in the room doing her makeup. it depends on how you look at it. BUT look at it this way, I was the ONLY person with the couple when they were doing preperation. the purpose of capturing more background (on that shot for example) was to show how it was like at the place. even the layout of things, and how the bride was sitting in wait. the moments were captured as it is, even with the surroundings and all .......... while us as photographer may actually regard as distraction or bad photography (to some), those who are not photographers (such as family and friends) actually appreciate it so much to see the details. the parents of both bride and groom, even their siblings and anyone who wasn't there were able to appreciate it as they picture "BRING THEM THERE". while i sometimes do move things away due to distraction, some things i actually left behind for a purpose. all in all, my most happy moments come the next day when i unveiled the shots at their wedding dinner (a surprise for the couple, not part of their plan) - the couple, their parents, siblings were all damn happy with the shots. after the wedding we actually viewed the slideshow again again again again and on and on and on (like Duracell bunny). |
|
|
|
|
|
May 22 2008, 02:08 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,161 posts Joined: Dec 2006 From: http://www.vincentpang.ws |
nice composition, the wide angle is poisonous
|
|
|
May 22 2008, 02:08 PM
|
|
Elite
7,826 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(goldfries @ May 22 2008, 01:18 PM) it depends on how you look at it. You don't have to move things away to remove distractions, they do tell the story and explain the environment if captured the right way. No harm at all capturing it this way if you and your friends are happy with your shots. BUT look at it this way, I was the ONLY person with the couple when they were doing preperation. the purpose of capturing more background (on that shot for example) was to show how it was like at the place. even the layout of things, and how the bride was sitting in wait. the moments were captured as it is, even with the surroundings and all .......... while us as photographer may actually regard as distraction or bad photography (to some), those who are not photographers (such as family and friends) actually appreciate it so much to see the details. the parents of both bride and groom, even their siblings and anyone who wasn't there were able to appreciate it as they picture "BRING THEM THERE". while i sometimes do move things away due to distraction, some things i actually left behind for a purpose. all in all, my most happy moments come the next day when i unveiled the shots at their wedding dinner (a surprise for the couple, not part of their plan) - the couple, their parents, siblings were all damn happy with the shots. after the wedding we actually viewed the slideshow again again again again and on and on and on (like Duracell bunny). Anyway here is just my personal opinion and by this I do not mean it in a bad way. Just sharing some of my thoughts from my personal experience. » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « Keep up the good work |
|
|
May 22 2008, 02:10 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
15,278 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
you're lucky to get a place where there's so much lighting. at a recent friend's wedding, she held it in camerons at her own home where lighting is at a bare minimum. headache to shoot esp with only a pop-up flash. With goldie's permission, i can reproduce some shots here too.
so what say you goldfries? |
|
|
May 22 2008, 02:12 PM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
@vincent - thanks!
@mavik - totally understand and i really appreciate the feedback. i have no luxury / space to move the chairs. just really wanted to isolate the bride waiting to leave the place. QUOTE(kev da man @ May 22 2008, 02:10 PM) you're lucky to get a place where there's so much lighting. at a recent friend's wedding, she held it in camerons at her own home where lighting is at a bare minimum. headache to shoot esp with only a pop-up flash. With goldie's permission, i can reproduce some shots here too. er? start a gallery la. this wayso what say you goldfries? 1. you get better attention 2. discussions will be better maintained. btw guys, UWA's weakness - mirrors. their angle make it even easier to capture yourself. |
|
|
May 22 2008, 02:15 PM
|
|
Elite
7,826 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
Any close up shots of the bride (during make-up) or impromptu portrait shots outdoors?
Edit: Sorry, previous question was too general This post has been edited by Mavik: May 22 2008, 02:18 PM |
|
|
May 22 2008, 02:19 PM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
got la but didn't put only. there were way more shots. just not displaying them.
i'm just posting the ones that i like the composition / output. #6 was an impromptu shot actually. and amazingly many people loved that one. |
|
|
May 22 2008, 02:23 PM
|
|
Elite
7,826 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
Yup, #6 is a good candid shot
Post more la, don't need to be so shy shy |
| Change to: | 0.0176sec
2.99
5 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 24th December 2025 - 05:12 AM |