so yea as the title says...which software gives the most accurate reading of a proc's temp?
Core Temp or RealTemp?
Core Temp vs RealTemp, which one give an accurate reading?
|
|
 May 15 2008, 03:06 AM, updated 18y ago
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Senior Member
871 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: A Galaxy Far Far Away...  
|
|
Quote|
|
|
|
|
May 15 2008, 07:14 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member
871 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: A Galaxy Far Far Away...
|
in my case tho, realtemp shows 5c less than core temp. how about you?
|
|
|
Jun 4 2008, 06:50 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member
871 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: A Galaxy Far Far Away...
|
QUOTE(Bleed_X @ Jun 4 2008, 03:32 PM) i just open everything, coretemp, realtemp, everest, abit uguru, and when the temp got too high, i stop stressing. up till now, the temps shown are all under 55c. yeah, realtemp & coretemp got difference alright, like coretemp is showing 2c-3c lower than realtemp, everest & uguru temp monitoring. mine goes the other way around. realtemp is much lower than coretempso for me, realtemp is the most reliable.  |
|
|
Jun 10 2008, 12:33 AM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
Senior Member
871 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: A Galaxy Far Far Away...
|
65c is still okay i guess for loads temps
 |
| Change to: |  0.0140sec
 0.80
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 10th December 2025 - 06:55 AM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.