Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Photography Grass eating club! Come join, What r u saving up for?what equipment?
SUSTheVoIP
|
May 14 2008, 10:21 PM
|
|
People complaiting about me dunno how to compose... actually because I have limited lenses... So... I wish I have a 35 L to overcome some of my equiptment limitation. Then maybe 24-70 L or 24-105 L and hopefully the new 5D replace or 1D mark III. That's all I want.... But no money.... Maybe I have to do parttime liao....
|
|
|
|
SUSTheVoIP
|
May 14 2008, 10:30 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Ahmike @ May 14 2008, 10:22 PM) Looking at your gaming rig...sell it loh..maybe can get few more stuff That is for gaming ma... QUOTE(JAYworm @ May 14 2008, 10:25 PM) guess it will be around canon 1ds markIII price yup, see hows the improvement model for a700. If complait too short, there is 100-400 IS L. Its quality at 400mm wide open really not bad. I will write a review on it when I have time. And potrait with 300 f2.8 on FF will give really impressive result!
|
|
|
|
SUSTheVoIP
|
May 14 2008, 10:32 PM
|
|
QUOTE(empire23 @ May 14 2008, 10:31 PM) 2.3 for the tripod and a good 1.2 for the head. I hope i get more shifts. You are so $$$$
|
|
|
|
SUSTheVoIP
|
May 14 2008, 10:39 PM
|
|
QUOTE(myjunk @ May 14 2008, 10:34 PM) What sort of Part Time? Maybe it is about time I should make money from camera shooting... Or part time for what I am doing in works.... Or... selling sex service? Am I good looking enought?
|
|
|
|
SUSTheVoIP
|
May 14 2008, 10:42 PM
|
|
QUOTE(myjunk @ May 14 2008, 10:40 PM) if you look like your avatar then can consider lah.. keke
|
|
|
|
SUSTheVoIP
|
May 14 2008, 10:47 PM
|
|
QUOTE(myjunk @ May 14 2008, 10:42 PM) wei.. Smiley face not the same as your avatar lah.. I think I really like my new avatar... I like her... QUOTE(JAYworm @ May 14 2008, 10:46 PM) i thought VOIP very handsome one I am not meh?
|
|
|
|
SUSTheVoIP
|
May 14 2008, 10:59 PM
|
|
QUOTE(vikingw2k @ May 14 2008, 10:57 PM) Guys, reduce the spamming. Don't go off topic. Discuss what you wanna buy, and why. We don't need to know how you going to survive with 1 maggi or eat grass Ya... And it is why I just got another warning!!! Hahaha.... LOL... So childish..
|
|
|
|
SUSTheVoIP
|
May 15 2008, 11:05 AM
|
|
QUOTE(castrodesauza @ May 15 2008, 09:16 AM) I ate grass long time ago . Next coming purchase: 1. 100mm f2.8 macro + 24-70mm f2.8 L, or 2. 40D + BG-E2N, or 3. 5D or 5D replacement Be warn that Canon 100mm f2.8 macro is not an L lense. For first few years everything will go fine... until all your collection are L lenses, then you feel something missing from the macro lense. Nothing wrong with the image quality thought.... Just it is not L....
|
|
|
|
SUSTheVoIP
|
May 15 2008, 11:22 AM
|
|
QUOTE(valho @ May 15 2008, 11:19 AM) in that case he'll have to go for the 180mm macro already To most people surprise... I found the 180 L to be hunting in low light! Camera used is 30D. Maybe due to f3.5 which is optimised for macro... maybe... This is also one of the few Canon lenses that I have little experinces... Anyone mind to let me one to play?
|
|
|
|
SUSTheVoIP
|
May 15 2008, 02:58 PM
|
|
QUOTE(eddychstu @ May 15 2008, 02:36 PM) starving for efs10-22 and 70-200 f2.8L I used to have the 10-22. The performance is ok... But because it is not L, it does not have L built nor L color. Thus the color rendering quality is just like other 3rd party or other competitor offering... I mean normal color la... Maybe a CPL can enchance the color lo... It is why if you have the cash, go FF and get 17-40 L. At least still enjoy L color that can show off... This post has been edited by TheVoIP: May 15 2008, 02:59 PM
|
|
|
|
SUSTheVoIP
|
May 15 2008, 03:07 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Mavik @ May 15 2008, 03:04 PM) I thought normally those with FF would go for the 16-35mm f/2.8 L� lens? I have seen quite a number of them being used because of the F/2.8 and also the wide area covered Reason are simple... 17-40 is only RM2500... and easily get used one at RM2k or even less While 16-35 II got no used unit... Price I think RM5000+ You think cheap ar? The additional RM3k can buy another great lense like 135 L already. For wide angle, personally I do not need f2.8. Even constant f5.6 also enought makan for me... for my standard la.. So to me, the only different for the prices is only 1mm.... which I think can close one eye la... Unless you are as rich as empire23 la... than get the 16-35! This post has been edited by TheVoIP: May 15 2008, 03:08 PM
|
|
|
|
SUSTheVoIP
|
May 15 2008, 03:25 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Mavik @ May 15 2008, 03:23 PM) Well at least I know the reason why they got that lens, the only main reason. F/2.8 Btw, Nikon no 16-35mm f/2.8 L USM lens Nikon has even better 14-24... BUt there are 2 concern on the Nikon only.... (1) Cannot use condom (I mean protective filter la) to protect the lense... What if it got scrathes? (2) How to use CPL?
|
|
|
|
SUSTheVoIP
|
May 15 2008, 03:27 PM
|
|
QUOTE(gogo2 @ May 15 2008, 03:24 PM) 1/3 ar? means your tax has reached maximum bracket. Wah, VOIP very rich. No wonder can afford 85mm f/1.2. TheVoIP is a poor man... All money gone to L this and L that already...
|
|
|
|
SUSTheVoIP
|
May 15 2008, 03:55 PM
|
|
QUOTE(arshad @ May 15 2008, 03:51 PM) tipu lar. thevoip got golden egg in his house. I wish... You think if got choice, I still want to use 40D ar?
|
|
|
|
SUSTheVoIP
|
May 15 2008, 07:57 PM
|
|
QUOTE([) tr|al[],May 15 2008, 07:42 PM]saving up for for 24-70 f2.8 L n 135 L...oooooh when can i get it? We share the same dream lenses... I also want the extra 35 L only... Money... Money... Money... This post has been edited by TheVoIP: May 15 2008, 07:58 PM
|
|
|
|
SUSTheVoIP
|
May 15 2008, 09:24 PM
|
|
QUOTE([]tr|al[] @ May 15 2008, 08:09 PM) voip : u getting the 35L prime? Want do you mean by getting? My heart want to buy... But wallet no cash. How?
|
|
|
|
SUSTheVoIP
|
May 16 2008, 10:29 AM
|
|
QUOTE(castrodesauza @ May 16 2008, 07:43 AM) have to work very hard + find good projects, and savings... wanna join ar? What project?
|
|
|
|
SUSTheVoIP
|
May 16 2008, 11:41 AM
|
|
QUOTE(xandman @ May 16 2008, 11:40 AM) some project... voip in? What kind of project? model shooting? Or what?
|
|
|
|
SUSTheVoIP
|
May 16 2008, 02:31 PM
|
|
QUOTE(xandman @ May 16 2008, 11:50 AM) actually...i oso dunno la... ask mr. castrodesauza la... if i have some offer... i'll offer to u guys! ya... need money to fun new toy...
|
|
|
|
SUSTheVoIP
|
May 20 2008, 09:54 AM
|
|
QUOTE(nairud @ May 20 2008, 09:46 AM) Review by shashinki owner didnt show any prominent distortion Sigma UWA are not as good as tokina 124.. so go figure. lol tempting My personal experince with Tokina 12-24 is very good. Color is solid with even sharpness across the screen. The corner sharpness at f4 is very close to my 17-55 f2.8 IS
|
|
|
|