People complaiting about me dunno how to compose... actually because I have limited lenses... So... I wish I have a 35L to overcome some of my equiptment limitation. Then maybe 24-70L or 24-105L and hopefully the new 5D replace or 1D mark III.

That's all I want....

But no money.... Maybe I have to do parttime liao....

That is for gaming ma...

If complait too short, there is 100-400 IS L. Its quality at 400mm wide open really not bad. I will write a review on it when I have time.

And potrait with 300 f2.8 on FF will give really impressive result!

You are so $$$$

Maybe it is about time I should make money from camera shooting...

Or part time for what I am doing in works....

Or... selling sex service? Am I good looking enought?

I think I really like my new avatar... I like her...

I am not meh?

Ya... And it is why I just got another warning!!! Hahaha.... LOL... So childish..

Be warn that Canon 100mm f2.8 macro is not an L lense. For first few years everything will go fine... until all your collection are L lenses, then you feel something missing from the macro lense. Nothing wrong with the image quality thought.... Just it is not L....

To most people surprise... I found the 180L to be hunting in low light! Camera used is 30D. Maybe due to f3.5 which is optimised for macro... maybe...

This is also one of the few Canon lenses that I have little experinces... Anyone mind to let me one to play?

I used to have the 10-22. The performance is ok... But because it is not L, it does not have L built nor L color. Thus the color rendering quality is just like other 3rd party or other competitor offering... I mean normal color la... Maybe a CPL can enchance the color lo...

It is why if you have the cash, go FF and get 17-40L. At least still enjoy L color that can show off...

This post has been edited by TheVoIP: May 15 2008, 02:59 PM

Reason are simple... 17-40 is only RM2500... and easily get used one at RM2k or even less

While 16-35 II got no used unit... Price I think RM5000+ You think cheap ar?

The additional RM3k can buy another great lense like 135L already.

For wide angle, personally I do not need f2.8. Even constant f5.6 also enought makan for me... for my standard la..

So to me, the only different for the prices is only 1mm.... which I think can close one eye la... Unless you are as rich as empire23 la... than get the 16-35!

This post has been edited by TheVoIP: May 15 2008, 03:08 PM

Nikon has even better 14-24... BUt there are 2 concern on the Nikon only....

(1) Cannot use condom (I mean protective filter la) to protect the lense... What if it got scrathes?

(2) How to use CPL?

TheVoIP is a poor man... All money gone to L this and L that already...

I wish...

You think if got choice, I still want to use 40D ar?

We share the same dream lenses... I also want the extra 35L only...

Money... Money... Money...

This post has been edited by TheVoIP: May 15 2008, 07:58 PM

Want do you mean by getting? My heart want to buy... But wallet no cash. How?

What project?

What kind of project?

model shooting? Or what?

ya... need money to fun new toy...

My personal experince with Tokina 12-24 is very good. Color is solid with even sharpness across the screen.

The corner sharpness at f4 is very close to my 17-55 f2.8 IS