okay guys.. simple situation

the time is around 1 am.

you have a file around 100mb to transfer between 2 pc. file sharing is not available but you have MSN and a USB drive that is almost full.

USB drive is full and you need to empty it, but those files are important.

You have MSN that can transfer file.

so, the question is: Should you use MSn or USB drive?

which one is more convenient?+

bear in mind, the MSN is on the same network.

this is not a tech question,

i just need a simple opinion based answer.

usb.

i will choose msn...


i'm not sure how msn work.. but sometimes i transfer files via msn in the same network,... it seems very fast

usb, you got into an argument with someone ?

u transfer usb files into ur com 1st.

so now usb got space.

then transfer the 100mb file into usb.

then transfer it into another com.

so 100mb settle?

now go back to the 1st com.

transfer back the usb files back into the usb.

yup
.. haha...


matter of convenient, it is not convenient to do that. IMO

You and your friend are kelakar la.

nothing else to do. since its holiday..

so what is your opinion ?

since you are already doing this, why don't you go time the file copy via MSN and your USB port

my answer is via MSN
u and your housemate is still in LAN connection, while transferring file, the speed will be similar like LAN speed

I would suggest using LAN, just copy, paste, copy, paste, dont use MSN, I have a bad experience with them (corrupted files: my fav porn videos)

the rule is that. file sharing is somehow down.

choose MSN or USB.

---

Added on May 10, 2008, 12:59 pmthat is what I'm trying to prove to them. use MSN within the same LAN. Speed should be fast. more convenient than emptying your important file from your USB.

This post has been edited by bezet: May 10 2008, 01:00 PM

Ooo, so you cant use LAN? I would still suggest USB, due to troublesome iternet connections in my area

no no... LAN is available, but File Sharing is down (due to some stupid window problem). So we are left with MSN and USB