well if mazda vs honda i will still take honda tho , due to its reliability

When I open my service booklet and flip on the service centre branches, everywhere also got. I cannot imagine that if I flip Mazda service booklet to look for service centre branches. That time, I'll tell myself, "I deserve to have heart attack."

---

Added on August 6, 2008, 12:00 amCount me in when you buy GTR. Naza selling for RM888 888.00. Sure huat all the way lah.

Uniqueness, can pawn lah. This is for sure. Uniqueness in terms of service bawah pokok, sure win liau. No need to fight.
If performance and comfort or luxury, hmm... Cannot make it lah. Sorry.

lol , diy use plastic bottol , got bumper reinforcement , zhun , unique

Ya right..Honda gives you so many service branches because they expected you to visit them every week due to unbelievable amount of complaints from their Melaka made products...while Mazda Hiroshima made just won 1st and 2nd place in least amount of complaints....so who needs more service centers?

---

Added on August 6, 2008, 9:17 amThis is first time i heard ppl so happy visiting SC...alo..been to Mazda SC? They also serve all kind of drinks, wifi, etc and I dont shout it out...cheapskate...

---

Added on August 6, 2008, 9:20 am
I didnt read all the tread before i posted some of my reply to them...after reading all the posts only i realised what a low class response they are,...and now feeling that i brought myself down to thier standard..no wonder they call Accord Ah beng...

---

Added on August 6, 2008, 9:27 am
Because they cant find anything to bash, so just came out with all sorts of low class responses...jealousy

Aik taikor. It's now known as the Nissan GTR. Code name R35. Nomore sukailaine 

I think I've been pretty neutral throughout this entire thread. Posting my opinion together with some facts on the advantages of Mazda over Honda.

Being a Toyota owner myself, I'm actually very surprised to see the kind of response coming from someone who owns an Alphard & a Accord. Hello sharkteef, this isn't some pissing contest to see who has a bigger penis or who owns a more expensive car. It's great that you think the Accord is a good car, I do too. But accept the fact that it too has its fair share of shortcomings. Granted that some of the posters here posted what seemed like an inflamatory post, but they're just expressing their opinion on why they think the Accord isn't better. I don't think they have at any point called the Accord a piece of shit.

You can disagree if you wish, but at least post something constructive
on why you think the Accord is better instead of posting comments which outright make you look like an immature little kid.

We all have a certain brand we support, but it's also important to know the brand's merits and shortcomings so that we can give feedback for it to improve. Unless of course if you're paid to support the brand, it's an entirely different story.

If Accord users are ahbeng, then Mazda 6 users are moron.
So you think Accord is what? Proton Saga with GT wing?

Case closed. You continue with your Mazda, and I continue with my Honda.

Eh, don't give me that kind of eye contact lah.

lol

Come on, no need to get personal here. Billytong has stated that the car is unique is because there's not many of them on the road in Malaysia.
So what's the problem with that? I fail to see the offensiveness in his statement.

This whole thread has been about Mazda 6 vs the New Accord so what has this got to do with the number of service center available, the kind of service you get at the service center? So on what basis do you base your arguement that spare part is difficult to procure? What we have are only assumption that it will be costly and it might take time to obtain them, it doesn't necessarily mean that might be the case. Alkt and if memory serves, as stated by Chips of motortrader - Car manufacturers are required to keep a certain level of spare parts as inventories for the cars they sell. So what's up with the coffin shop and heart attack statement?

Your prediction that Mazda will fair worse under Bermaz which is a Vincent Tan company is based on what? The dude is certainly tangled up with the Lingam case, but what has that got to do with his companies? Last I check, they seem to be doing ok and Bermaz seems to be doing a rather adequete job of promoting Mazda. Don't you think it would only be fair to give them the benefit of the doubt for at least a year before jumping to conclusions?

Another point is the Mazda 6's resale value. We agree that its resale value is probably going to be poor compared to a Camry or Accord. But 50% less? Let's be realistic here, last I check with the star classifieds, its resale value is about 10% less than that of a Camry model for the same year which isn't too bad for a niche car brand.

If you say something like:

- The Accord is more comfortable because of its class leading cabin space - nobody is going to dispute with you on that because the dimensions speak for themselves.
- The Accord is more powerful based on test results from magazines & personal experience - again not much to dispute because you substantiate your findings based on proper research.

So far all you have demonstrated is typical fanboyism mentality by attacking another brand because their opinion differs from yours which is clearly seen from page 24 onwards of this entire thread. I'm not taking sides here but at the very least if you want to attack someone to justify your statements, do it like jchue73 who consistently post some facts to back his claims (with the exception of his Mazda 3 pawning everybody statement, which is just dumb  ).

i lost track liaw ... can some give me updates hahah