QUOTE(verx @ May 8 2008, 01:45 PM)
Again you are assuming alot of things here. I won't speak for the other teams but Real Madrid have toured Asia and done their fair share of brand building in Asia (maybe not so much in Malaysia). But their market is stronger over in the Americas. The fact that they have set up Realmadrid TV in English in US proves so. And I can tell u that despite the influx of money coming to the EPL, we are one club that can still compete with the English clubs (Our brand value is the highest in the world). Where the Spanish and Italians have paled in comparison to the English is their league federation. The English league is run miles better than their continental counterparts.
What about the other clubs in Spain? I'm sure it has to be a concerted effort? There isn't a point in identifying with just one club and knowing nothing of the rest (though I'm sure there are Premiership fans who are the same). Manchester United were arguable the first club to really penetrate the East but only after the Premiership had gained a fairly large international following. In essence, it was a safe gamble. Although they may not do that well in selling original merchandise, they definitely have a large television following. Their efforts were also supplemented by the FA who has in recent times begun to organise mini tournaments or promotional matches here. Clubs like Newcastle, Birmingham and Norwich (ok so it was because of Proton) or some less fancied sides that have played here. They also have the "Legends" tour where former English league greats drop by for autograph session or whatever. My point is that there has been a massive effort not just to cultivate interest in English clubs, but in the English league in it's entirety.
My intention is not to claim that one league is another. To put things back into context, it's to suggest to Mr. Blatter than the success of English clubs is attributed to the fact that it is marketable, and thus attracts big sponsors and investors. Why it's marketable is because the FA put a lot of effort into making it appealing to a global audience. To want to limit the success of English clubs in Europe, so to speak is to suggest that the English FA were wrong to have done what they have done; to become profitable.
QUOTE
Really? Correct me if I'm wrong but I believe that even before the days of live football there were generally more fans of English clubs than there are of the other European clubs. The fact that we are a Commonwealth country will always give the British game a upperhand.
In Malaysia, probably but we are talking about the whole of Asia here. I'm struggling to see how the fact that we are a Commonwealth country has to do with the English game being more popular here. I mean I myself was born after independence and aside from the fact we speak English, I don't see why I should feel any connection to England. Even if it were a language issue, we get English commentary for other leagues as well.
QUOTE
The Spanish league is as big as the English one in the Middle East given that the timings of the games are better for them.
Which would mean that the timing for Premiership matches are somewhat inconvenient? Suffice to say, when you have a large enough following, fans will chose to stay awake for matches, well some fans anyway. Case in point; European games, even in the group stages.
QUOTE
What most around this region know about Real Madrid has largely been because of the galactico era started by Perez. It really put us on a global level. But of course the negatives come along with that. We have since been associated with the things that u relate there. Not all of them false of course but some are unfair criticisms in my view as well. Presidential campaigns were rarely about bringing bigger stars until Perez pulled off that Figo transfer. Since then it has become a trend. But that's what makes us different. We have elections where the fans actually get to vote. For all the shouting from the English that their clubs rightfully belong to the fans, here is one club that is actually legally owned by the fans but we get criticised for it. Go figure. As for Del Bosque, his contract finished and we didn't renew it. He was always not going to continue on as he was just a youth coach who was promoted to do a temporary job but did wonders. He hasn't been successful since he left the club though. And we did go through alot of managers after that..something I'm not proud of but the club is alot more stable now.
Well I'm going to stop here as my knowledge on the matter ends here. As usual, I always seek to learn more about things that I don't know much about.
QUOTE(berzerk @ May 8 2008, 02:33 PM)
About the Arsenal team being full of foreigners, I'd like to point out that most of these foreigners were actually brought into Arsenal at a young age and probably could, if they chose to, play for england (Almunia for example).
Players like Clichy, Fabregas, Song, Denilson etc could potentially play for England (or get a UK passport) if they wanted to.
So who is foreign now?
I don't agree with this to a degree. In my opinion, to be classified as "homegrown", one has to be born in that country. I disagree all the same with players representing countries they have never visited, much like how John Barnes or Robbie Earl represented Jamaica. It probably is residual effect of globalisation. In other sports, you already see nations offering talented athletes from less fortunate nations to take up residence in their country.