QUOTE(Kaka23 @ Oct 19 2012, 07:30 PM)
cos u said Malaysian focus, and these 3 are the better ones available that I know Fund Investment Corner v2, A to Z about Fund
Fund Investment Corner v2, A to Z about Fund
|
|
Oct 19 2012, 07:32 PM
Return to original view | Post
#361
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
16,872 posts Joined: Jun 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 20 2012, 10:21 AM
Return to original view | Post
#362
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
16,872 posts Joined: Jun 2011 |
|
|
|
Oct 20 2012, 12:10 PM
Return to original view | Post
#363
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
16,872 posts Joined: Jun 2011 |
QUOTE(Kaka23 @ Oct 20 2012, 11:34 AM) I am -1.8% to date behind my expected gain for this year. 2 more months to go, hope can achieve my own forecast target. Not only FSM, lotsa reports saying that dividend stocks are overpriced at the moment...Added on October 20, 2012, 11:37 am I only buy in not much.. so I will be slowly topping up when got extra money and more when market dips.. |
|
|
Oct 24 2012, 07:13 AM
Return to original view | Post
#364
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
16,872 posts Joined: Jun 2011 |
|
|
|
Oct 24 2012, 11:41 AM
Return to original view | Post
#365
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
16,872 posts Joined: Jun 2011 |
|
|
|
Oct 24 2012, 02:26 PM
Return to original view | Post
#366
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
16,872 posts Joined: Jun 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 24 2012, 07:57 PM
Return to original view | Post
#367
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
16,872 posts Joined: Jun 2011 |
For god's sake how many times do we have to repeat this
U SIMPLY CANNOT JUDGE THE VALUATION OF A FUND BASED ON ITS NAV ALONE u have to look at the valuation of its underlying assets I.e. Fund ABC at RM1.0234 vs Fund XYZ at RM0.8975, Fund ABC = expensive? NO!!! A fund's NAV pricing CANNOT tell whether a fund is "expensive" or not. U have to see (i) the P/E i.e. valuation of the equities the fund holds and (ii) the dividend yield of the equities it holds Sigh This post has been edited by Pink Spider: Oct 24 2012, 07:58 PM |
|
|
Oct 24 2012, 10:27 PM
Return to original view | Post
#368
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
16,872 posts Joined: Jun 2011 |
|
|
|
Oct 25 2012, 09:20 AM
Return to original view | Post
#369
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
16,872 posts Joined: Jun 2011 |
QUOTE(wongmunkeong @ Oct 25 2012, 08:28 AM) http://finance.yahoo.com/news/dollar-cost-...Y3Rpb25z;_ylv=3 so, Wong Seafood opine, now is a "so-so average market" or "already down market"? Is Dollar-Cost Averaging Overrated? Snippets: The result: The lump-sum method delivered higher returns compared with the 12-month dollar-cost averaging method about 66% of the time regardless of whether an all-equities, all-bond, or 60% equity/40% bond allocation was used. The authors note that the longer the dollar-cost averaging time frame, the greater the chance of the lump-sum method outperforming. It's also worth noting that while lump-sum investing consistently outperformed dollar-cost averaging, the average rate of outperformance was relatively modest. Using a 60/40 equity-bond allocation in U.S. markets and dollar-cost averaging over a period of 12 months, the authors found that after 10 years the initial $1 million investment would have grown to $2,450,264 on average using the lump-sum method versus $2,395,824 using dollar-cost averaging, a difference of about $54,000 or 2.3%. So the Vanguard study proves it's always best to invest in a lump sum if possible, right? Not so fast. As the authors concede, during market declines, the dollar-cost averaging method often performs better because it helps mitigate the effects of falling share prices, whereas the lump-sum method puts all the capital at risk in the market at once. ---------- IMHO (your mileage may vary): a. it's all about risk (exposure of capital) to rewards. b. in a so-so average market, dollar averaging, value averaging or a combo is good for controlling exposure (other than an over-arching Asset Allocation lar) c. in an already down market (end 2008 / early 2009), lump sums would do statistically better coz lelong sale... but (there's always one) don't lar "sai lang 100% cash in", may be in lump sums of 2 or 3 tranches. Heck, after falling 40% - 50%, wild value lelong prices BUT who says market can't fall another 20% or more from there? Those who says no, take a look at 1997-1998, double dips in KLSE Just sharing some thoughts, no perfectly right/wrong yar |
|
|
Oct 25 2012, 11:21 AM
Return to original view | Post
#370
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
16,872 posts Joined: Jun 2011 |
QUOTE(wongmunkeong @ Oct 25 2012, 11:12 AM) Below are just pure opinions yar, not gospel truths. but IMHO, for long-term good, US NEEDS to fall off the fiscal cliff. Their government spending really needs to control. But for the health of the global economy, we need the americans to keep spending and spending and to incur more debts and debts and debts. hehhe - depends on WHICH market MY - i think it's like near/on the top of a roller coaster's "hill".. be AWARE getting in now SG - so-so Shanghai - looks slight recovery started a couple of weeks ago. at 21xx VS 2008/2009 norms of 19xx and lowest 18xx, i bought 1 tranche in already earlier US - very worried about Jan's "fiscal cliff". Looks similar to MY currently |
|
|
Oct 25 2012, 11:25 AM
Return to original view | Post
#371
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
16,872 posts Joined: Jun 2011 |
|
|
|
Oct 25 2012, 01:12 PM
Return to original view | Post
#372
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
16,872 posts Joined: Jun 2011 |
|
|
|
Oct 25 2012, 02:34 PM
Return to original view | Post
#373
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
16,872 posts Joined: Jun 2011 |
QUOTE(Xiaofeng90 @ Oct 25 2012, 02:22 PM) hmm is it okie for buying amb DTF as my start?? or should i pick those fund with low risk , sorry im so new >.< AMB DTF is already quite low risk, but valuation of dividend stocks are on the high side currently, i.e. u have limited upside potential, significant downside risk. If u intend to hold for long-term (at least 5 years), just buy and hold, no problem. |
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 26 2012, 01:08 PM
Return to original view | Post
#374
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
16,872 posts Joined: Jun 2011 |
QUOTE(mois @ Oct 26 2012, 09:23 AM) For those who wants to know more about the fund. Go here Not comparable to AmDynamic Bond:http://www.ambankgroup.com/en/FundManageme...acticalBond.pdf The fund will invest in low credit rating. Mean higher risk for higher returns. Not so sure whether it has the same holdings as amdynamic bond or not. - AmTactical invests in foreign (asian) bonds - AmTactical charges up to 2% SC (but 0% exit fee) I'd say, AmTactical is in the same league as Hwang Select Bond, OSK-UOB Income and RHB Asian Total Return. |
|
|
Oct 29 2012, 09:32 AM
Return to original view | Post
#375
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
16,872 posts Joined: Jun 2011 |
QUOTE(kparam77 @ Oct 28 2012, 04:58 PM) 5-10% compounded return is expected, cannot guarantee abt 10%, even in equity funds, for bond 5-6% is realistik. r u sure amdynamic bond give 10% annualy? taht is very good. better than equity funds. AmDynamic normalised annualised returns is around 8-9% ok, if u hv 1k per month. and as per suggest by others go for both and equity. assuming 2 funds. first month, open 1k in bond 2nd, open 1k in equity 3rd month sign up DDI rm500 each for both acc. But year-to-date, returns are slowing down, which is expected given the rally in bonds and the current low yield of bonds by historical standards. |
|
|
Oct 29 2012, 01:16 PM
Return to original view | Post
#376
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
16,872 posts Joined: Jun 2011 |
|
|
|
Oct 30 2012, 01:17 AM
Return to original view | Post
#377
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
16,872 posts Joined: Jun 2011 |
QUOTE(jutamind @ Oct 29 2012, 05:15 PM) What's your strategy for this fund in you are in the profit? Do you take profit on your gains or let it run? Still in the red, losing on sales charge. Keeping for >3 years investment horizon. I'm gonna top up whenever GEM equities go thru a selling downthe reason why i ask so is that normally i dont have any eastspring funds in my FSM portfolio. So to take profit, normally this would means selling the units. this would mean that if i were to buy this fund again, then i will incur another 2% sales charge, rather than switching to another eastspring funds, which i dont have any now. This post has been edited by Pink Spider: Oct 30 2012, 01:19 AM |
|
|
Oct 30 2012, 07:38 AM
Return to original view | Post
#378
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
16,872 posts Joined: Jun 2011 |
|
|
|
Oct 30 2012, 11:49 PM
Return to original view | Post
#379
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
16,872 posts Joined: Jun 2011 |
U guys are taking the analogy too far
I use another analogy 1 piece of 100 gram gold vs 10 pieces of 10 gram gold dun tell me smaller pieces value bla bla bla in unit trusts and even for shares, no. of units are TOTALLY IRRELEVANT to the question of worth. |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0288sec
0.53
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 9th December 2025 - 05:22 PM |