Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Thor (June 2011)

views
     
stargazer_7
post Apr 28 2011, 02:26 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
89 posts

Joined: May 2009
QUOTE(Fawkes @ Apr 28 2011, 01:54 AM)
Hmm, then why do they give option for student price in e-ticketing?  rclxub.gif
*
If i not mistaken student prices are always available. Just that the prices for blockbuster films will be higher but still cheaper than the normal adult price.
stargazer_7
post Apr 29 2011, 12:04 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
89 posts

Joined: May 2009
The effects are simply dazzling. I love the futuristic feel of Asgard, its like meshing mythology and sci-fi together.
Chris Hemsworth is excellent as Thor. From an arrogant *******, to a confused human, then a remorseful son, and finally a true warrior, he couldn't hide his charm throughout the movie, especially when he smiled... biggrin.gif
Tom Hiddleston who played Loki is equally impressive too. And I appreciate the way they made Loki a complicated character, instead of a plain one-dimensioned villain seeking for power.

The same, however, cannot be said for other characters. Natalie Portman is there just for the sake of being the chick. Her character, Jane Foster, basically did nothing at all the whole movie besides being consistently concerned about Thor. Same goes to the four Thor's sidekicks. We know virtually nothing about them, except that they are loyal to Thor. I didn't even catch their names in the movie. I hope that the inevitable upcoming sequels can correct this out. At least give us who never read the comic books some backstory about those characters..
Ohh and the action scenes are..kinda..boring...to me. The CGI may be awesome to watch, but the fighting is anything but thrilling. From the beginning where Thor fought the Frost Giants right until the 'climatic' battle between Thor and Loki, I kept hoping for something that would excite me, but I never saw it. The scenes are too short, each time starting with Thor waving his hammer and ending with Thor stop waving his hammer, as nothing seems to stand a chance against the mighty Mjolnir.

Hmm well if you are looking for mindless entertainment, this movie is strongly recommended. It is much better than Clash of The Titans, but still has a long way to go to match Iron Man. Its a typical fun-to-watch yet forgettable Hollywood movie.


P/S This movie is converted to 3D in post-production instead of being filmed in 3D. Which typically means watching in 3D is nothing but a waste of money. Still, would like to hear feedback from people watching in 3D too..
stargazer_7
post Apr 29 2011, 12:25 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
89 posts

Joined: May 2009
QUOTE(Razaelx @ Apr 29 2011, 12:11 AM)
^^cool review bro

n thanks for informing bout post production 3d convertion

dont want to feel like watching clash of the titans again vmad.gif

btw tron also didnt really feel the 3d...was it converted in post production also ? hmm.gif
*
Haha, this forum thread might be useful for you.
http://forum.blu-ray.com/3d-blu-ray-movies...-converted.html
Dunno whether the list will keep updating or not though..
FYI, Tron is filmed in 3D, not converted..according to it..
stargazer_7
post May 6 2011, 11:56 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
89 posts

Joined: May 2009
QUOTE(ping325 @ May 6 2011, 12:44 AM)
this and fast 5 which one better ?
*
For me I prefer Fast Five...
Simply more thrilling...

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0225sec    0.59    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 5th December 2025 - 04:19 PM