QUOTE(Vv.SoViEt.vV @ Apr 27 2008, 11:48 PM)
Your reply is much appreciated, dreamer. So, here are my statements/questions.
1) After some deep research, I agree with you on WFC and BOA. Reason for you to include WB is dividend right? WB had subprime exposure but they are not coming close to WFC and BOA. After subprime losses eroded into their earnings and eventually forced them to cut dividends.
2) Would you mind to explain why you choose only mortgage lenders/banks who are only exposed to subprime? Yes, I agree that CITI is too complicated but chances to rebound will earn you more than ever?
3) Countrywide Financial comes close, being taken over by BOA. Much like JP Morgan with Fed to bail out Beat Stearn. What about Bear Stearn? it had plunged into 3 years low (or maybe more), according to my limited data. Oh, even BOA, CITI, WFC, BS have reach new-low's. WB rebounded since 1st of Jan 2008. Good time to start new year uh?

Vv.SoViEt.vV,
<<WB had subprime exposure but they are not coming close to WFC and BOA. >>
1) We are buying stock/share. So, their (WB) exposure is not as high but the stock price had been beaten down as though the exposure is high. So, it is a better deal. In a panic, everyone sells without thinking whether the problem affects all bank equally.
<<Would you mind to explain why you choose only mortgage lenders/banks who are only exposed to subprime?>>
2) I have no idea how to evaluate the exposure to all those derivatives. Nobody does. Subprime mess is easier to understand. After the banks write off the mortgage, they are in a good/better shape.
3) There are MORE PANIC coming. It is not over yet. I have set my low buy limit order. If it hits, I will buy.
Buy GOOD and WELL MANAGED companies at GOOD price. In a panic, still shop for the BEST companies. WFC and WB looks to have better management than BOA or CITI.
Disclaimer: I am buying with my "PLAY MONEY". So, this is not an investment for me. This is strictly my own personal opinion and not recommendation to buy any stock. Take my advice with a lot of cautions.
Dreamer
Added on April 28, 2008, 2:40 amQUOTE(wheimeng @ Apr 28 2008, 02:05 AM)
they aren't too huge in market value compared to citi or the listed banks. citi is like one of the largest financial group in the world, having it bankrupt would have immense side effect to global market. na, it is a must save entity. oh well, prince thalaweed and temasek are in, im sure they've made their due diligence prior investing yea?

wheimeng,
Bear Stern's shareholder lost their shirts. So, a bank may not fail but you may still lose most of your money in the process.
Dreamer
This post has been edited by dreamer101: Apr 28 2008, 02:40 AM