Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
6 Pages « < 2 3 4 5 6 >Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 AMD� Socket-AM2/AM2+ Overclocking thread (V8), Phenom Phenom Phenom

views
     
Shah_15
post Jun 3 2008, 12:35 AM

~~Van Der Woodsen~~
*******
Senior Member
2,395 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: Up in the Sky
QUOTE(mr_habuk @ Jun 3 2008, 12:33 AM)
sure u can pushed more than 1.95vdimm..???
isn't vdimm max for m2n-e is 1.95v?? hmm.gif

ooo..thinking on making a mode arr..?? brows.gif
*
sure bro. Right now using 2.0v vdimm....got some trick leh... tongue.gif tongue.gif
Shah_15
post Jun 3 2008, 12:39 AM

~~Van Der Woodsen~~
*******
Senior Member
2,395 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: Up in the Sky
QUOTE(Lacus @ Jun 3 2008, 12:38 AM)
haxxors! lol..Make sure not to burn ur mobo though bro...or not later... u cry.gif
*
haha...sure sure....not going to burn my mobo....i not idiot enough to do that.... sweat.gif sweat.gif
Shah_15
post Jun 3 2008, 12:41 AM

~~Van Der Woodsen~~
*******
Senior Member
2,395 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: Up in the Sky
QUOTE(Lacus @ Jun 3 2008, 12:41 AM)
Nvm~...old stuffs don't go, new stuffs don't come whistling.gif jz joking btw laugh.gif
*
what you mean....cannot understand.... rclxub.gif rclxub.gif
Shah_15
post Jun 3 2008, 12:46 AM

~~Van Der Woodsen~~
*******
Senior Member
2,395 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: Up in the Sky
QUOTE(Lacus @ Jun 3 2008, 12:45 AM)
lol, i mean as in if the old stuff (as in ur current mobo or anything) died or anything, no excuse for new 1 laugh.gif
*
oh...i see...i see... doh.gif
Shah_15
post Jun 3 2008, 12:50 AM

~~Van Der Woodsen~~
*******
Senior Member
2,395 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: Up in the Sky
QUOTE(Lacus @ Jun 3 2008, 12:47 AM)
well, did u ever consider buying new mobo if u got the funds? For oc purpose lar  brows.gif
*
don't know yet la...currently my mood not into oc yet....but who know....
Shah_15
post Jun 3 2008, 01:18 AM

~~Van Der Woodsen~~
*******
Senior Member
2,395 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: Up in the Sky
QUOTE(casperito @ Jun 3 2008, 01:16 AM)
hmmm... almost the same as mine... seems that or proc bottleneck the GC...
a fren of mine got 15K CF @ 800/2400 on intel @ 3.6ghz...

i think its either the proc speed or the proc architecture itself... wondering if phenom will not bottleneck CF...

mine @ 3.12ghz CF on 3DMark06 scores 12K and on 3DMark05 18K @ 850/2500... T_T  cry.gif

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
need to look at what type of ram used too....
Shah_15
post Jun 3 2008, 02:02 AM

~~Van Der Woodsen~~
*******
Senior Member
2,395 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: Up in the Sky
QUOTE(casperito @ Jun 3 2008, 01:30 AM)
ram shudn't be any prob...
i dun think that 3DMark do any testing on the rams...
summore my rams are running @ 1040mhz...

and maybe u can tell me how do rams can bottleneck procs??

noob here.. blush.gif

hmm later will post the single card score on intel rig..
studying for my finals exams now... sweat.gif
*
this is what i meant....


QUOTE(digswell @ Jun 3 2008, 01:54 AM)
All the thing is causing the proc ram and the mobo . the most importand thing is the bandwidth speed between n/b with s/b with proc with ram ...all the link in mobo is very importand. think bout it  hmm.gif  hmm.gif
*
Shah_15
post Jun 3 2008, 02:18 AM

~~Van Der Woodsen~~
*******
Senior Member
2,395 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: Up in the Sky
Just think the ram, mobo and gc connected by wire to the proc. the speed of the wire affected the benchmark result. So the faster the speed of wire, the faster your pc are.
Shah_15
post Jun 3 2008, 07:17 PM

~~Van Der Woodsen~~
*******
Senior Member
2,395 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: Up in the Sky
Melfice, I notice something bout your ram speed there. Try increase your multiplier to 12.5. Maybe your 3Dmark06 will increase too.
Shah_15
post Jun 4 2008, 12:11 AM

~~Van Der Woodsen~~
*******
Senior Member
2,395 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: Up in the Sky
QUOTE(casperito @ Jun 3 2008, 11:29 PM)
how will changing the multiplier could increase the 3DMark score?? sweat.gif
*
changing multiplier also changing the ram speed. For me, when I increase my multiplier to 15, my ram is 860MhZ, so thats why not stable. when i decrease the multiplier back to 14.5, the ram speed go to 780.

Multiplier 15x
Attached Image

Multiplier 14.5x
Attached Image

FSB is not touch.

This post has been edited by Shah_15: Jun 4 2008, 12:15 AM
Shah_15
post Jun 4 2008, 12:23 AM

~~Van Der Woodsen~~
*******
Senior Member
2,395 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: Up in the Sky
tongue.gif
QUOTE(pikacu @ Jun 4 2008, 12:21 AM)
actually, changing the multiplier will change the ram divider, hence affect ram speed tongue.gif
*
hahaha...same meaning. yeah....can't think of that word when posting that while ago. tongue.gif
Shah_15
post Jun 4 2008, 12:34 AM

~~Van Der Woodsen~~
*******
Senior Member
2,395 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: Up in the Sky
QUOTE(casperito @ Jun 4 2008, 12:29 AM)
yet, still u change the multipler the core speed also change...
not all proc are able to do that, changing multipler without changing the FSB...

lucky for BE users... T_T...
*
yes I know that but I just pointed that to Melfice. He also a BE Users.
Shah_15
post Jun 4 2008, 12:37 AM

~~Van Der Woodsen~~
*******
Senior Member
2,395 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: Up in the Sky
QUOTE(sarahlah @ Jun 4 2008, 12:36 AM)
wah.. only BE users having fun right now.. laugh.gif
*
you know....BE also sometimes have advantage over 3800+ F3... tongue.gif tongue.gif tongue.gif

This post has been edited by Shah_15: Jun 4 2008, 12:37 AM
Shah_15
post Jun 4 2008, 12:43 AM

~~Van Der Woodsen~~
*******
Senior Member
2,395 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: Up in the Sky
QUOTE(casperito @ Jun 4 2008, 12:29 AM)
yet, still u change the multipler the core speed also change...
not all proc are able to do that, changing multipler without changing the FSB...

lucky for BE users... T_T...

P/S
@ 14.5x ur ram still running @ 5-5-5-18 while @ 15x still 5-5-5-18... tried to run it @ 4-4-4-18??
try CL4, i think ur super PI speed will be faster.. ehehe
and 1.344v can do 3.3ghz alreadi... coooool.... stable??
*
will try that but I hate super PI. jealous to see those E8400 user only 10s calculate 1mb.... cry.gif
Shah_15
post Jun 4 2008, 12:50 AM

~~Van Der Woodsen~~
*******
Senior Member
2,395 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: Up in the Sky
Really ke casperito? Changed the CL to 4 now Super PI 1mb 30s. Usually 29s jer...I still confused about CL. Which is better? more lower or more higher CL?
Shah_15
post Jun 4 2008, 12:54 AM

~~Van Der Woodsen~~
*******
Senior Member
2,395 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: Up in the Sky
QUOTE(Melfice @ Jun 4 2008, 12:53 AM)
ermm .. it happend after i change ram to DDR 800 .. then it be 590x2 .. that time lan fried adi ... i oni change the option that i alwiz change lor ... ==" duno why happen ... sighhh
*
maybe over-limit vdimm??
Shah_15
post Jun 4 2008, 12:59 AM

~~Van Der Woodsen~~
*******
Senior Member
2,395 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: Up in the Sky
is there any harm if I set my CL to 3?
Shah_15
post Jun 4 2008, 01:01 AM

~~Van Der Woodsen~~
*******
Senior Member
2,395 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: Up in the Sky
so better I increase the vdimm to at least 2.3v. Let me try first.
Shah_15
post Jun 4 2008, 01:16 AM

~~Van Der Woodsen~~
*******
Senior Member
2,395 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: Up in the Sky
just try CL 3..cannot boot at all.. Need to reset the BIOS..
Shah_15
post Jun 4 2008, 01:19 AM

~~Van Der Woodsen~~
*******
Senior Member
2,395 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: Up in the Sky
I don't think can go CL3. Stick with CL4 atm but the Super PI score slower 1s. Why ah?

6 Pages « < 2 3 4 5 6 >Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0330sec    0.69    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 13th December 2025 - 08:25 PM