Hah,Bro pWs has come.= = Stop with the folding le.I know Intel do better in that just asking his feel between his PDC and X2.
AMD� Socket-AM2/AM2+ Overclocking thread (V8), Phenom Phenom Phenom
AMD� Socket-AM2/AM2+ Overclocking thread (V8), Phenom Phenom Phenom
|
|
May 11 2008, 08:18 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,221 posts Joined: Aug 2007 From: Deneb star |
Hah,Bro pWs has come.= = Stop with the folding le.I know Intel do better in that just asking his feel between his PDC and X2.
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 11 2008, 08:20 PM
|
|
Elite
8,545 posts Joined: Aug 2006 From: 224.0.0.6 |
Hahaa...alright.
In real life application, you wont feel any difference. AMD boot in windows more smooth as i can feel that. -pWs- |
|
|
May 11 2008, 08:23 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,991 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: Johor |
Agree.. when i was use 3800+
loading windows and load everything completely at desktop.. dam fast. after changed to intel.. slow a bit already.. This post has been edited by Liuteva: May 11 2008, 08:24 PM |
|
|
May 11 2008, 08:38 PM
|
|
Elite
8,103 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Tanah Lot @ Dungun, Terengganu. |
QUOTE(sarahlah @ May 11 2008, 07:40 PM) not yet bro... d raid thingy is givin hard times... argh... i hate sb600 seriously.... QUOTE(Liuteva @ May 11 2008, 08:14 PM) run sp & other figures related benchy then u'll feel d diff... QUOTE(-pWs- @ May 11 2008, 08:17 PM) die hard folder... |
|
|
May 11 2008, 08:40 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,221 posts Joined: Aug 2007 From: Deneb star |
Hate sb600?Wait SB 750 den
Sure lah in benchie and SP diff but in real life? Not to mention Folding..ok stop But dang thing No more OC for Mainstream Nehalem user.. This post has been edited by AMDAthlon: May 11 2008, 08:42 PM |
|
|
May 11 2008, 08:44 PM
|
|
Elite
8,103 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Tanah Lot @ Dungun, Terengganu. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 11 2008, 08:45 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,221 posts Joined: Aug 2007 From: Deneb star |
Retire??What you mean by retire?
|
|
|
May 11 2008, 08:50 PM
|
|
Elite
8,103 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Tanah Lot @ Dungun, Terengganu. |
QUOTE(AMDAthlon @ May 11 2008, 08:45 PM) u'll know it's time for u when d budget for pc is gettin smaller & age is catchin up w/ u (less patience)... will post some oc this week but i dun expect it to be as gud as ta690g, thou it looks better w/ d silent otes thingy... |
|
|
May 11 2008, 09:13 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
653 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Originated From Hell. Status: Lazy. |
QUOTE(Liuteva @ May 11 2008, 08:23 PM) Agree.. when i was use 3800+ Agreed I used E8200 OC 4Ghz boot and Windows feel damn slow.loading windows and load everything completely at desktop.. dam fast. after changed to intel.. slow a bit already.. I also don't see any difference in World Of Conflict & Company Of Heroes in frame rates. I believe 5000BE and paired with 3870 is a good value for everyday gaming. |
|
|
May 11 2008, 09:42 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,991 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: Johor |
OMG!... You poison me!!
feel wanna change back to AMD.. lol |
|
|
May 11 2008, 10:25 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,740 posts Joined: Jun 2006 From: Some Yih |
|
|
|
May 11 2008, 11:25 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,994 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Behind You |
QUOTE(DevilMan @ May 11 2008, 09:13 PM) Agreed I used E8200 OC 4Ghz boot and Windows feel damn slow. its true even my old day barton 2500+ also like tatI also don't see any difference in World Of Conflict & Company Of Heroes in frame rates. I believe 5000BE and paired with 3870 is a good value for everyday gaming. why like tat???? |
|
|
May 11 2008, 11:36 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,221 posts Joined: Aug 2007 From: Deneb star |
Because Intel does not independant on the core itself.They share/kongsi sama2.AMD Processor,each core do their own job.EG:Core 1 Ready to display the icon and taskbar or whatsoever,Core 2 ready for starting up the systems.
While Intel processor Both core doing starting up the systems at the same time,so that its not ready to display those icons.I THINK ONLY. |
|
|
|
|
|
May 11 2008, 11:43 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,484 posts Joined: Nov 2007 From: Nilai,N.S.D.K |
QUOTE(DevilMan @ May 11 2008, 09:13 PM) Agreed I used E8200 OC 4Ghz boot and Windows feel damn slow. Me Agreed tooo.I also don't see any difference in World Of Conflict & Company Of Heroes in frame rates. I believe 5000BE and paired with 3870 is a good value for everyday gaming. With Photoshop application u will feel much much more different when u zoom the pic with higher resolution |
|
|
May 12 2008, 01:33 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,404 posts Joined: Apr 2006 From: ...... |
QUOTE(DevilMan @ May 11 2008, 09:13 PM) Agreed I used E8200 OC 4Ghz boot and Windows feel damn slow. no difference in frame rates? I also don't see any difference in World Of Conflict & Company Of Heroes in frame rates. I believe 5000BE and paired with 3870 is a good value for everyday gaming. you are using win xp or vista? DX10 gaming or DX9? QUOTE(AMDAthlon @ May 11 2008, 11:36 PM) Because Intel does not independant on the core itself.They share/kongsi sama2.AMD Processor,each core do their own job.EG:Core 1 Ready to display the icon and taskbar or whatsoever,Core 2 ready for starting up the systems. hard to understand what are you trying to explain While Intel processor Both core doing starting up the systems at the same time,so that its not ready to display those icons.I THINK ONLY. both c2d and athlon64 X2 are symmetric multicore processors, they have equal and identical cores on die. both processors are able to perform multithreading/ multitasking in significant way. the thing shared both cores is the L2 cache, not the core itself (for intel c2d) For intel c2d , it is known as unified L2 cache , each core can access and utilise the L2 cache up to 100% while Athlon64 X2 has separated L2 cache for each core the difference of the cache design for c2d & Athlon64 X2 has pros and cons accordingly |
|
|
May 12 2008, 01:35 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,221 posts Joined: Aug 2007 From: Deneb star |
You forgot AMD64/X86-64
|
|
|
May 12 2008, 01:45 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,404 posts Joined: Apr 2006 From: ...... |
|
|
|
May 12 2008, 01:52 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,740 posts Joined: Jun 2006 From: Some Yih |
guys..sorry for this n00b question :
Is there any amd chipset mobo around RM~300 that will support crossfire ? or only 790fx chipset support crossfire? This post has been edited by pikacu: May 12 2008, 01:52 AM |
|
|
May 12 2008, 01:55 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,221 posts Joined: Aug 2007 From: Deneb star |
Abit AX78 support Crossfire.1 16x,1 4x.dblooi Yeah i know i wrong.AMD64..i may know some but..later buat malu only = =
Hold on is it true Intel EM64T is just 32X2? |
|
|
May 12 2008, 02:03 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,404 posts Joined: Apr 2006 From: ...... |
QUOTE(AMDAthlon @ May 12 2008, 01:55 AM) Abit AX78 support Crossfire.1 16x,1 4x.dblooi Yeah i know i wrong.AMD64..i may know some but..later buat malu only = = Hold on is it true Intel EM64T is just 32X2? QUOTE x86-64 was designed by AMD, who have since renamed it AMD64. It has been cloned by Intel under the name Intel 64 (formerly known as EM64T among other names). This leads to the common use of the names x86-64 or x64 as more vendor-neutral terms to collectively refer to the two nearly identical implementations. see more : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X86-64#Differ...64_and_Intel_64 This post has been edited by dblooi: May 12 2008, 02:05 AM |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0250sec
0.55
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 10th December 2025 - 02:38 AM |