QUOTE(-pWs- @ May 9 2008, 12:00 PM)
heheh... me too.. AllnGap fans are the best... juz uglyvamp clearance sale is darn cheap..got from him ram cooler modded with 60mm delta fan @ 60++ cfm.. damn cun...
AMD� Socket-AM2/AM2+ Overclocking thread (V8), Phenom Phenom Phenom
|
|
May 9 2008, 05:46 PM
Return to original view | Post
#21
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
662 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: int eth 5/0/16 vlan 13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 24 2008, 03:02 PM
Return to original view | Post
#22
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
662 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: int eth 5/0/16 vlan 13 |
QUOTE(@meno @ May 24 2008, 12:39 PM) I'm back, have been missing for quite some time due to connection issues. nice result there bro...Had a died router...just got a spare router from a friend. Wanted to load this screenie since a week ago... » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « Wil try further when i have time... as pWs said tighten ur timing a bit.. try running the rams @ 4-4-4-12 850mhz... put summore vdimm... This post has been edited by casperito: May 24 2008, 03:03 PM |
|
|
May 29 2008, 04:51 AM
Return to original view | Post
#23
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
662 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: int eth 5/0/16 vlan 13 |
|
|
|
Jun 2 2008, 04:52 AM
Return to original view | Post
#24
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
662 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: int eth 5/0/16 vlan 13 |
QUOTE(Melfice @ Jun 1 2008, 10:11 PM) » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « seems that ur using CF... mind sharing ur 3DMark score with me?? This post has been edited by casperito: Jun 2 2008, 04:52 AM |
|
|
Jun 3 2008, 01:16 AM
Return to original view | Post
#25
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
662 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: int eth 5/0/16 vlan 13 |
QUOTE(Melfice @ Jun 2 2008, 02:39 PM) hmmm... almost the same as mine... seems that or proc bottleneck the GC...a fren of mine got 15K CF @ 800/2400 on intel @ 3.6ghz... i think its either the proc speed or the proc architecture itself... wondering if phenom will not bottleneck CF... mine @ 3.12ghz CF on 3DMark06 scores 12K and on 3DMark05 18K @ 850/2500... T_T » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « |
|
|
Jun 3 2008, 01:30 AM
Return to original view | Post
#26
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
662 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: int eth 5/0/16 vlan 13 |
QUOTE(Shah_15 @ Jun 3 2008, 01:18 AM) ram shudn't be any prob...i dun think that 3DMark do any testing on the rams... summore my rams are running @ 1040mhz... and maybe u can tell me how do rams can bottleneck procs?? noob here.. hmm later will post the single card score on intel rig.. studying for my finals exams now... This post has been edited by casperito: Jun 3 2008, 01:32 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 3 2008, 01:42 AM
Return to original view | Post
#27
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
662 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: int eth 5/0/16 vlan 13 |
QUOTE(digswell @ Jun 3 2008, 01:35 AM) I no believe this all bendmark thing. hehehe.. i dun believe also...Most of the bendmark look got very high score with darkside but for brightside .... Did the bendmark programmer write the software using amd proc architecture or using intel or wat For me at least i no got lagging when play games .then that is enuf for me just for fun onli... i rather test on games... but when u tried it and ur score is kinda low, at least u can try to find out wat make the score low... in my case, i found out that my proc bottleneck my CF... but at least, in games it doesn't show any signs of bottlenecking so i dun care much la.. ehehehe... juz wondering onli.. ehehehe |
|
|
Jun 3 2008, 01:52 AM
Return to original view | Post
#28
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
662 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: int eth 5/0/16 vlan 13 |
|
|
|
Jun 3 2008, 01:57 AM
Return to original view | Post
#29
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
662 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: int eth 5/0/16 vlan 13 |
QUOTE(Melfice @ Jun 3 2008, 01:53 AM) haha , nid to wait for proper cooling now using NucleaTec only ... waiting my money to grab San Ace or Sunon ... and some ram cooler ... skip the ram cooler... crucial non tracer one are not that hot... u'll be wasting ur money onli... unless u want to go crazy ram speed @ crazy vdimm... u can get that one later on... mine are unuseable coz my hsf block the rams... T_T...get the TRUE 120 that lehteck selling la... dang cheap... free suscool fan summore.... ehehehe... Added on June 3, 2008, 1:59 am QUOTE(digswell @ Jun 3 2008, 01:54 AM) All the thing is causing the proc ram and the mobo . the most importand thing is the bandwidth speed between n/b with s/b with proc with ram ...all the link in mobo is very importand. think bout it err... i dun understand??? This post has been edited by casperito: Jun 3 2008, 01:59 AM |
|
|
Jun 3 2008, 02:21 AM
Return to original view | Post
#30
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
662 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: int eth 5/0/16 vlan 13 |
QUOTE All the thing is causing the proc ram and the mobo . the most importand thing is the bandwidth speed between n/b with s/b with proc with ram ...all the link in mobo is very importand. think bout it nb bandwidth change onli when u OC the proc... and the integraed memory controller kicks in controlling the rams speed according to the HTT that u set when OCing the proc... sb bandwidth will follow the the nb bandwidth?? is this wat u guys meant to say?? Added on June 3, 2008, 2:22 am QUOTE(Melfice @ Jun 3 2008, 02:18 AM) using TR120E ... no proper 120MM FAN le ==" .... Crucial Tracer Ballistix .. the LED 1 la .. dam hot -__- and im using it rite now aik?? ur siggy state Crucial non tracer... eheheh...Added on June 3, 2008, 2:30 am QUOTE(digswell @ Jun 3 2008, 02:13 AM) Too hard for me u explain all bout it....all the thing is causing AMD planform and the proc . And the proc too QUOTE(Shah_15 @ Jun 3 2008, 02:18 AM) Just think the ram, mobo and gc connected by wire to the proc. the speed of the wire affected the benchmark result. So the faster the speed of wire, the faster your pc are. so logically, its the Proc architecture la...since AMd proc has a built in Memory Controller and HTT Tech... this will effect the HTT bandwidth itself... the NB controls all the I/O links such as PCiE, audio... the SB controls the I/O links such as SATA, PATA, PCi, USB.... so going thru this all ends up on the proc... This post has been edited by casperito: Jun 3 2008, 02:30 AM |
|
|
Jun 3 2008, 09:26 AM
Return to original view | Post
#31
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
662 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: int eth 5/0/16 vlan 13 |
QUOTE(fatalynx05 @ Jun 3 2008, 08:17 AM) i got my x2 5200 windsor f3 proc and ta770 a2+ mobo... my setting is: 5200 F3 shud able to go 3.0 without lowering down the multiplier...fsb280x11 vcore +0.100 with ddr ratio 667 vdimm 2.3v (ram speed 880mhz) htt i put 600mhz multiplier ...i still cannot pass prime test.. is it any setting that i mistaken?? i attached some screenies below.. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() try 232 x 13 vcore 1.4v.. shud able to boot... lower ur ram divider... later on i'll post my x2 5200 bios code... This post has been edited by casperito: Jun 3 2008, 09:31 AM |
|
|
Jun 3 2008, 11:29 PM
Return to original view | Post
#32
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
662 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: int eth 5/0/16 vlan 13 |
|
|
|
Jun 4 2008, 12:29 AM
Return to original view | Post
#33
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
662 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: int eth 5/0/16 vlan 13 |
QUOTE(Shah_15 @ Jun 4 2008, 12:23 AM) yet, still u change the multipler the core speed also change...not all proc are able to do that, changing multipler without changing the FSB... lucky for BE users... T_T... P/S @ 14.5x ur ram still running @ 5-5-5-18 while @ 15x still 5-5-5-18... tried to run it @ 4-4-4-18?? try CL4, i think ur super PI speed will be faster.. ehehe and 1.344v can do 3.3ghz alreadi... coooool.... stable?? This post has been edited by casperito: Jun 4 2008, 12:34 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 4 2008, 12:40 AM
Return to original view | Post
#34
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
662 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: int eth 5/0/16 vlan 13 |
QUOTE(Shah_15 @ Jun 4 2008, 12:34 AM) T_TAdded on June 4, 2008, 12:43 am QUOTE(pikacu @ Jun 4 2008, 12:39 AM) hehehehe... pocket kosong... peoples poison aren't effective...This post has been edited by casperito: Jun 4 2008, 12:43 AM |
|
|
Jun 4 2008, 12:50 AM
Return to original view | Post
#35
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
662 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: int eth 5/0/16 vlan 13 |
QUOTE(Shah_15 @ Jun 4 2008, 12:43 AM) close ur eyes and ignore intel... cannot do anything... focus on AMD super pi score...my roomate also bragging about his super pi speed although it is me who do all the Ocing on his intel rig.. QUOTE(Melfice @ Jun 4 2008, 12:45 AM) .. i duno lor suddenly soo hot .. btw u guyz know i fried my lan when oc-ing .. suddenly only .. now using Wifi at my desktop ... u shudn't use onboard I/O while Ocing... easily kaput...haihh ... chipset soo hot ... now i pointing table fan into my chasis my suggestion, get a chipset cooler... DeepCool chipset cooler seems nice.. the price is cheap also... |
|
|
Jun 4 2008, 12:56 AM
Return to original view | Post
#36
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
662 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: int eth 5/0/16 vlan 13 |
QUOTE(Shah_15 @ Jun 4 2008, 12:50 AM) Really ke casperito? Changed the CL to 4 now Super PI 1mb 30s. Usually 29s jer...I still confused about CL. Which is better? more lower or more higher CL? try reading thishttp://forum.lowyat.net/topic/627600 its kinda hard for me to explain... |
|
|
Jun 4 2008, 01:00 AM
Return to original view | Post
#37
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
662 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: int eth 5/0/16 vlan 13 |
|
|
|
Jun 4 2008, 01:11 AM
Return to original view | Post
#38
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
662 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: int eth 5/0/16 vlan 13 |
QUOTE(Shah_15 @ Jun 4 2008, 12:11 AM) QUOTE(Shah_15 @ Jun 4 2008, 01:01 AM) from the pic that u pis earlier, @ 3.3ghz ur rams are running @ 832mhztry this timing 4-4-4-18 2T @ 2.0v and check whether it can boot or not... im not that sure about OCZ Gold rams... last time a fren use it, the ram are not that OCable... if u rajin enuff, lower ur multiplier, OC ur rams see how high it can go... my rams able to run @ 1040mhz 5-5-5-12 2T @ 2.2v with HTT 260 x 12 @ 3.12ghz vcore 1.45v.. (cannot push higher anymore T_T) |
|
|
Jun 4 2008, 01:19 AM
Return to original view | Post
#39
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
662 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: int eth 5/0/16 vlan 13 |
QUOTE(sarahlah @ Jun 4 2008, 01:14 AM) ahaha... that time i forgot to edit the font color for the CPU-Z...this one after i edit the font color... » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « i have eye of an eagle Added on June 4, 2008, 1:20 am QUOTE(-pWs- @ Jun 4 2008, 01:18 AM) CL3 need much much higher Vdimm than CL4. yup.. as taiko pWs says.. lower timings require more vdimms...I doubt your ram speed can cope w CL3. At least 2.4v I guess. -pWs- This post has been edited by casperito: Jun 4 2008, 01:20 AM |
|
|
Jun 4 2008, 01:26 AM
Return to original view | Post
#40
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
662 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: int eth 5/0/16 vlan 13 |
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0314sec
0.42
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 8th December 2025 - 05:00 AM |