Hmm, under the employment law for ppl under rm1500 are entitled to sick leave though. Maybe gotta check with some pro lawyer whether this doesn't apply / applies to non-confirmed staff.
Not confirmed so no sick leave
Not confirmed so no sick leave
|
|
Apr 20 2008, 01:29 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,691 posts Joined: Mar 2006 |
Hmm, under the employment law for ppl under rm1500 are entitled to sick leave though. Maybe gotta check with some pro lawyer whether this doesn't apply / applies to non-confirmed staff.
|
|
|
Apr 20 2008, 04:31 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,691 posts Joined: Mar 2006 |
QUOTE(kb2005 @ Apr 20 2008, 03:29 PM) How about if the employement letter already stated in blck and white that you're not entitled for sick leave during probabtion and you have agreed by signing it ? I believe there is still an argument here. I believe employment law > appointment letter. Keyword being believe, cos I really have no authority / real knowledge to say whether this is or isn't true |
| Change to: | 0.0143sec
1.29
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 19th December 2025 - 08:44 AM |