Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Dilemma which car to go., Toyota? Honda or Lancer 2.0GT?

views
     
TSsingchaii
post Apr 17 2008, 07:08 PM, updated 18y ago

~N0 Pa|n,N0 Ga|N~
*******
Senior Member
7,842 posts

Joined: Sep 2004
From: Pandan Jaya,KL



Hey guy, I need your help to tell me which car should I go?

The price range car around now is, Toyota Altis 1.8G(RM117,900) , Honda Civic 1.8s (RM110,678) and Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0GT ( RM115,980.00). Which car should I go for? I had already get all the specs of those 3 car and I see Honda Civic and Lancer 2.0GT is better Altis while why the altis more expensive? I'm finding a long lasting car and also average in performance..
TSsingchaii
post Apr 17 2008, 07:11 PM

~N0 Pa|n,N0 Ga|N~
*******
Senior Member
7,842 posts

Joined: Sep 2004
From: Pandan Jaya,KL



QUOTE(sharkteef @ Apr 17 2008, 07:10 PM)
brand new car all 3 also good. got free service and warranty why u worry ?

unless u thinking bout resale value or spare parts and maintanence pricing.
*
is that mean you already answer me? sweat.gif sweat.gif Proton also got free service and warranty. Why I dun choose proton? doh.gif


Added on April 17, 2008, 7:13 pm
QUOTE(sphiroth @ Apr 17 2008, 07:11 PM)
Altis is more expensive because the 'T' badge is more expensive than the other two badge.  tongue.gif

If you don't mind the long waiting perid, get the Lancer 2.0 GT.  drool.gif
*
This is the problem.. But then, I still need more feedback on those 3 car which is worth and better to go off.. Some more I see many people complaining about toyota and poor service make me worry..

This post has been edited by singchaii: Apr 17 2008, 07:13 PM
TSsingchaii
post Apr 17 2008, 07:15 PM

~N0 Pa|n,N0 Ga|N~
*******
Senior Member
7,842 posts

Joined: Sep 2004
From: Pandan Jaya,KL



QUOTE(ShinAsakura @ Apr 17 2008, 07:13 PM)
Average performance...

Performance wise - Honda Civic
Cabin quality - Toyota Corolla Altis (maybe wrong)
Looks - NOT Toyota Corolla Altis
*
Cabin quality? Me just 22 age, and corolla inside look too old to me. While honda civic, inside cabin look cool. While lancer, I didn't see inside before.

QUOTE(babyk @ Apr 17 2008, 07:14 PM)
lancer 2.0GT is over rated and underpower
*
Lancer 2.0 GT over rated and underpower? Can give further info? Da*n.. This is good feedback from you...


Added on April 17, 2008, 7:17 pm
QUOTE(rcracer @ Apr 17 2008, 07:14 PM)
Lancer GT is still 115?
*
I saw at the website, it writen RM115,680

QUOTE(Gilbert5107 @ Apr 17 2008, 07:14 PM)
Honda Civic 1.8s?
this i think ok ah....because of the engine wise. is a vtec?
*
I-vtec engine...

QUOTE(WaCKy-Angel @ Apr 17 2008, 07:15 PM)
Altis is more expensive than Lancer?
U get the right price or what?

Anyway i suggest Altis...
Toyota car can pwn both of the other cars, not to mention high resell value
*
Yes... Altis 1.8G is more expensive... I saw it at website as well.

This post has been edited by singchaii: Apr 17 2008, 07:17 PM
TSsingchaii
post Apr 17 2008, 07:19 PM

~N0 Pa|n,N0 Ga|N~
*******
Senior Member
7,842 posts

Joined: Sep 2004
From: Pandan Jaya,KL



QUOTE(rcracer @ Apr 17 2008, 07:17 PM)
You can go to their owners forum, most said power is ermmm... probably because of CVT.
*
But I see in term of horsepower and torque, altis is the lowest. sweat.gif

QUOTE(ShinAsakura @ Apr 17 2008, 07:17 PM)
i changed my view haha. still prefer the civic over the outdated design of the altis. although altis provides more stuff.
*
Civic interior is nicer. Hehe..

QUOTE(sharkteef @ Apr 17 2008, 07:17 PM)
coz u didnt list proton perdana.
and there's no poll to choose between the 3.
3 also worth the money, 3 also got re-sale value, but 2 got better re-sale value. thats the civic and altis. havent seen lancer's 2nd hand value yet.

toyota and honda both got service cons. i own both. what do u wan me to say ? dont buy honda or toyota becoz their service centre suks ? that'll only leave u with the lancer option and hence u can go for the lancer.

kthxbye.
*
You own altis and civic?
TSsingchaii
post Apr 17 2008, 07:21 PM

~N0 Pa|n,N0 Ga|N~
*******
Senior Member
7,842 posts

Joined: Sep 2004
From: Pandan Jaya,KL



QUOTE(babyk @ Apr 17 2008, 07:18 PM)
for the weight of Lancer, it is over weight, with the 18" rims sommore, it is the worst 2.0 sporty car
*
18" inch rims is too much.. I forget this point. 18inch rims, that tire is expensive. mean the maintaince is high... sweat.gif


Added on April 17, 2008, 7:22 pm
QUOTE(ShinAsakura @ Apr 17 2008, 07:21 PM)
erm, we all know that bro sharkteef owned a Toyota Alphard 3.0 (his wife drive) and a Honda Accord.

I oso drives an old CF0 Accord, the power of VTEC really  thumbup.gif
*
That a reason I more to civic because of Ivtec and Lancer because of Mivec. Altis, it seem more to comfort.

This post has been edited by singchaii: Apr 17 2008, 07:22 PM
TSsingchaii
post Apr 17 2008, 07:27 PM

~N0 Pa|n,N0 Ga|N~
*******
Senior Member
7,842 posts

Joined: Sep 2004
From: Pandan Jaya,KL



QUOTE(babyk @ Apr 17 2008, 07:23 PM)
if you wan to know more, please add my MSN and talk to me and i will give you opinions
*
thank.. I will add you tonight..

QUOTE(ShinAsakura @ Apr 17 2008, 07:23 PM)
Besides, the Lancer 2.0 GT have a special fabricated sporty leather seats which are made of premium Nappa leather  sweat.gif
*
After I see by the members reply, lancer 2.0gt not really very worth only. sweat.gif
TSsingchaii
post Apr 17 2008, 07:36 PM

~N0 Pa|n,N0 Ga|N~
*******
Senior Member
7,842 posts

Joined: Sep 2004
From: Pandan Jaya,KL



QUOTE(babyk @ Apr 17 2008, 07:28 PM)
things to concern if you buy Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0GT
-service center availability
-power to weight ratio
*
Err.. Can give me your msn?

QUOTE(dopeisgood @ Apr 17 2008, 07:29 PM)
my 1st choice would be lancer 2.0 GT then followed by Civic 1.8..

lancer 2.0 GT looks nicer and its CBU car
Civic 1.8 is SOHC rite? but its a CKD car
but CIVIC has higher resale value and the parts avaibility is higher than Lancer 2.0 GT

altis is too mature for me..
jus my 2 cents
*
What is CBU and CKD??

QUOTE(allenultra @ Apr 17 2008, 07:30 PM)
I would pick Civic though.
Looks better, power better. Fuel consumption also better thanks to the 5-speed automatic gearbox.

Why overseas altis using new engine/gearbox but our local model only change the skin? why selling at the same price compared to previous model?
Altis? still an uncle car
*
I had drove a civic 1,8 before and it so fun to drive. Maybe I think is fun because my ride now is just 1.3 and suddenly drive 1.8, sure fun. sweat.gif

QUOTE(Downcast @ Apr 17 2008, 07:33 PM)
Altis consider quite sporty but just that is old engine so civic is better choice.!!
*
Mean I should give up altis? If comfort, altis is better?
TSsingchaii
post Apr 17 2008, 07:39 PM

~N0 Pa|n,N0 Ga|N~
*******
Senior Member
7,842 posts

Joined: Sep 2004
From: Pandan Jaya,KL



QUOTE(babyk @ Apr 17 2008, 07:37 PM)
i've added you and waiting for you to add me back

CBU=Complete Build Up which means fully imported from Japan and assembled in Japan
CKD=Complete Knocked Down which means all parts are imported from Japan and assembled in Malaysia
*
Like that, CBU seem is better ler.. Me around 8pm something only at home. That time only add you. icon_rolleyes.gif
TSsingchaii
post Apr 17 2008, 07:45 PM

~N0 Pa|n,N0 Ga|N~
*******
Senior Member
7,842 posts

Joined: Sep 2004
From: Pandan Jaya,KL



QUOTE(Bliz @ Apr 17 2008, 07:41 PM)
My pick would be Civic 2.0, best of all 3, the highest legroom of all not to mention the lovely 2.0 engine +17inch EP-3 Type-R rim from the previous Honda Civic Type R
*
civic 2.0 out of budget already. sweat.gif
TSsingchaii
post Apr 17 2008, 08:44 PM

~N0 Pa|n,N0 Ga|N~
*******
Senior Member
7,842 posts

Joined: Sep 2004
From: Pandan Jaya,KL



babyk, I'm on9 now. can you add me again? =)


Added on April 17, 2008, 9:23 pmthread closed. Thank babyK.. =)

This post has been edited by singchaii: Apr 17 2008, 09:23 PM

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.5043sec    0.28    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 9th December 2025 - 01:00 AM