Jul 11 2008, 10:15 AM
QUOTE(asiahost @ Jun 25 2008, 11:10 AM)
The bold should be Certified Practicing Accountant (CPA Aust). Certified Public Accountant or CPA is widely used in USA. However, it is more the less the same..
I do agree neo6768 statement that TS should not compare narrowly about two qualifications in terms of popular. I would emphasize it is a matter of perception because there are ACCA grads who did well and also CPA Aust and other professional bodies grad who did as well as others. They are on par. The difference is in the individual. If you are good, no matter what you take.. where you go you will still succeed because you are good.. Its not you will succeed in future because you took ACCA or CPA.
These words really reaching to the heart of ppl in accounting professions, totally make sense & thats de reality......... I do agree neo6768 statement that TS should not compare narrowly about two qualifications in terms of popular. I would emphasize it is a matter of perception because there are ACCA grads who did well and also CPA Aust and other professional bodies grad who did as well as others. They are on par. The difference is in the individual. If you are good, no matter what you take.. where you go you will still succeed because you are good.. Its not you will succeed in future because you took ACCA or CPA.
Added on July 11, 2008, 11:08 amBTW, I am ACCA....the good is....I have option for direct MIA, ICPAS......the fall back...there is a dicussion issue commonly talked by UK/Euro forumers abt the ACCA vs CA like ICAEW...ICAS (UK CA bodies) & etc which always put ACCA below those CAs bodies.......But, if it is recognised then it is....if ACCA not good enough...then MIA won't accept direct entry..rite?
This post has been edited by cfng76: Jul 11 2008, 11:08 AM
Quote
0.0172sec
0.41
6 queries
GZIP Disabled