Yup... Just like mivec, not every version using the most powerful RS version. And not every VTEC using B16C...
IAFM, CPS, CamPro, All Discussions here.
IAFM, CPS, CamPro, All Discussions here.
|
|
Apr 8 2008, 11:51 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,448 posts Joined: Sep 2006 |
Yup... Just like mivec, not every version using the most powerful RS version. And not every VTEC using B16C...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 9 2008, 12:01 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,688 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: http://127.0.0.1 |
CPS R3 anyone?
|
|
|
Apr 9 2008, 12:04 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
144 posts Joined: Sep 2006 From: SJMC |
QUOTE(imperialrealcs @ Apr 8 2008, 10:30 PM) Yes, i agree they are totally different. But they both eliminated the torque dip didn't they? That's why i say same effect...juz my opinionQUOTE(imperialrealcs @ Apr 8 2008, 10:30 PM) the campro is not meant to be read as cam profile.. [sarcasm] Fine, CamPro Cam Profile Switching. Sounds much better. [/sarcasm] its a name, juz that the word derrived from the word cam profile |
|
|
Apr 9 2008, 01:53 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,724 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Seri Petaling |
QUOTE(sphiroth @ Apr 8 2008, 10:35 PM) Ooo.. So the correct one is 2 sets of lobe on 1 camshaft, not 2 cam sets. varies lift.. okay, when u switch to aggressive lobe, it open/lift the valve longer for more air intake etc etc..Isn't CPS varies the lift, not the timing? thats y u said it varies the lift of the valve hence the timing of the valve also varies accordingly thats y it is still consider VVT i stand to be corrected though QUOTE(the_catacombs @ Apr 8 2008, 11:14 PM) my car also can hit 140kmh without any mivec/vtec/cps/vvt/dvvt/vvti larr... boss, diffrent case coz that basher said all CPS/VTEC/MIVEC engine with wild profile will be underpowered if the profile is not activated.. i wana tell him even without turning on MIVEC, i still able to easily reach 140km/hCPS is not VVT ler.... VVT is variable valve timing... it varies the valve timing continuously according to driving condition.... CPS, as i said, switches cam profile like how mivec does.... btw, the VVT that u mention about is more like VVT-i lol.. any technology that change the timing of the valve opening/closing duration can be considered as VVT QUOTE(tcting @ Apr 8 2008, 11:51 PM) Yup... Just like mivec, not every version using the most powerful RS version. And not every VTEC using B16C... as far as i know, RS version of MIVEC engine is the same as regular 4G92 MIVEC..RS is the car trim option, like VTi, VTi-S as in Honda.. RS is a strip down version of mirage cyborg to make it lighter, suitable for Rally Sport if u r talking about RalliART tuned then diffrent lor QUOTE(yu_wang @ Apr 9 2008, 12:04 AM) Yes, i agree they are totally different. But they both eliminated the torque dip didn't they? That's why i say same effect...juz my opinion cps dont eliminate the torque dip, its the VIM that eliminate it..[sarcasm] Fine, CamPro Cam Profile Switching. Sounds much better. [/sarcasm] VIM and IAFM working principle should be the same.. CPS only switch the camlobe, nothing much Added on April 9, 2008, 1:56 ambesides, why is there the need to discuss/bash the name? since it is named campro then campro lor nobody read PROTON as PeRusahaan OTOmobil Nasional right? or PERODUA as PERusahaan Otomobil KeDUA Berhad? imo, campro is a good name.. too bad, tarnished by the limp campro lol This post has been edited by imperialrealcs: Apr 9 2008, 01:56 AM |
|
|
Apr 9 2008, 12:15 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
17,566 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: FFK Division - Klang |
|
|
|
Apr 9 2008, 02:33 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
401 posts Joined: Oct 2005 From: Melbourne, Australia |
I said 1.6 didn't I?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toyota_ZZ_engine#3ZZ-FE The 3ZZ-FE is the 1.6 L (1598 cc) version built in Japan. It is found in Asian Toyota Corolla Altis which is available in countries such as Singapore, Malaysia, Philippines, Thailand and Taiwan. In South Africa the motor can be found in the Rux 160 and Corolla 160. The entire exterior design and chassis is the same as the American Corolla. Bore is 79.0 mm and stroke is 81.5 mm. Max. Output is 109 hp (81 kW) @ 6000 rpm. Max. Torque is 111 lb·ft (150 N·m). of torque (150 Nm) @ 3800 rpm. Applications: * Toyota Corolla (Europe, 109 hp) * Toyota Corolla Altis 1.6E (Asian, 110 hp) * Toyota Corolla and RunX 160 (South African, 81 @ 6000Kw and 146 @ 4400Nm) OK I lose. The Asian version of the Altis 1.6 has 110 bhp too, with a much better torque figure (not the max torque, the curve) than the Campro. The CPS has better horsepower and same amount of max torque though I'm not sure which one has better low-end torque. Still, my point is that horsepower numbers don't mean everything. This post has been edited by mTk: Apr 9 2008, 02:34 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 9 2008, 02:56 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
17,566 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: FFK Division - Klang |
QUOTE(mTk @ Apr 9 2008, 02:33 PM) I said 1.6 didn't I? errr... not you...http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toyota_ZZ_engine#3ZZ-FE The 3ZZ-FE is the 1.6 L (1598 cc) version built in Japan. It is found in Asian Toyota Corolla Altis which is available in countries such as Singapore, Malaysia, Philippines, Thailand and Taiwan. In South Africa the motor can be found in the Rux 160 and Corolla 160. The entire exterior design and chassis is the same as the American Corolla. Bore is 79.0 mm and stroke is 81.5 mm. Max. Output is 109 hp (81 kW) @ 6000 rpm. Max. Torque is 111 lb·ft (150 N·m). of torque (150 Nm) @ 3800 rpm. Applications: * Toyota Corolla (Europe, 109 hp) * Toyota Corolla Altis 1.6E (Asian, 110 hp) * Toyota Corolla and RunX 160 (South African, 81 @ 6000Kw and 146 @ 4400Nm) OK I lose. The Asian version of the Altis 1.6 has 110 bhp too, with a much better torque figure (not the max torque, the curve) than the Campro. The CPS has better horsepower and same amount of max torque though I'm not sure which one has better low-end torque. Still, my point is that horsepower numbers don't mean everything. the other person... and CPS torque curve climbs and max out at 4.4k rpm but at 2k rpm onwards, u have more torque then non-cps campro and more importantly, there is no dip at 2.5k - 3.5k region... This post has been edited by kcng: Apr 9 2008, 02:59 PM |
|
|
Apr 9 2008, 03:06 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
401 posts Joined: Oct 2005 From: Melbourne, Australia |
Oh the other person
Yea, I know CPS has better torque than non-CPS Campro. I mean... low-end compared to the Toyota 1.6 engine. From the dyno chart I've seen on Paultan's website, it sure looks good though! |
|
|
Apr 9 2008, 06:28 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,804 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(mTk @ Apr 9 2008, 03:06 PM) Oh the other person Torque curve in Altis will provide better drivability across RPM range.. CPS curve is more suited for spirited driving style. Yea, I know CPS has better torque than non-CPS Campro. I mean... low-end compared to the Toyota 1.6 engine. From the dyno chart I've seen on Paultan's website, it sure looks good though! This post has been edited by sphiroth: Apr 9 2008, 10:09 PM |
|
|
Apr 9 2008, 09:57 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,951 posts Joined: Sep 2005 |
Driving curve? so sepang curves no problem?
|
|
|
Apr 9 2008, 10:03 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
872 posts Joined: Dec 2006 From: subang jaya-shah alam |
hope to test drive CPS someday ..
|
|
|
Apr 9 2008, 10:09 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,804 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Apr 9 2008, 10:11 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,951 posts Joined: Sep 2005 |
hehehe..and so we have the CPS, and a Lotus tuned suspension system..a sleeper proton perhaps?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 9 2008, 10:15 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,804 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Apr 9 2008, 10:18 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,951 posts Joined: Sep 2005 |
So bascily the CPS should be in manual gear? auto cannot?
|
|
|
Apr 9 2008, 10:21 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
10,975 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: disini disana |
|
|
|
Apr 9 2008, 10:25 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,804 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Apr 9 2008, 10:52 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
17,566 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: FFK Division - Klang |
as the saying goes, real man drive manual
(dun really hold water nowadays with the introduction of DSG etc) |
|
|
Apr 9 2008, 10:55 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
10,975 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: disini disana |
|
|
|
Apr 9 2008, 10:58 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
17,566 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: FFK Division - Klang |
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0264sec
0.64
5 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 2nd December 2025 - 12:15 PM |