They are similar in the form that
they both have collaterals.
1a. A mortgage has a collateral
(the property) backing the loan, if the customer does not pay the installments on time, the property can be repossessed and auctioned off
1b. An ASB-financing has a collateral
(the unit-certificate) backing the loan, if the customer does not pay the installments on time, the ASB-units can be sold
2. They are similar in that they are
term loans, and considered as
highly long-term liabilities, capped at 30/65-years of age and 35/70-years of age; unlike other loans available to the public such as business and personal loans (10 years), hire-purchase (9 years), and other revolving credit lines like credit cards, overdraft, share margins that have no terms
3. They are similar in that that they have
similarly low interest rates of about 4.5% p.a. and 4.9% p.a. Other loans/financing facilities such as the ones listed in point [2] are inflicted much higher interests rates
4. Sure, if we compare the the assets backing the loans/financing, they are completely different, that is a given because they are of different asset classes:
property vs unit-trusta) I should not have to explain that
ASB units are liquid, where the funds are withdraw-able in a few days (same-day for ASB) while
properties are illiquid, taking about 6-months to dispose
b) I should not have to explain that
ASB units are capital-protected, where the capital would remain the same throughout the years, because of its nature as a fixed-price per unit and guaranteed by PNB. On the other hand,
properties can experience capital gain and/or loss going forward
c) I should not have to explain that
ASB units get their returns from dividends, earned each month based on the monthly-minimum balance in your account, without fail, from which the worst-case scenario in a given a year would be 0% dividend; while
for properties the recurring income come in the form of rentals, from which there would be rental-gaps during a transition between tenants, damages that need to be rectified, taxes, maintenance fees, etc.
Yes, there are differences between the collaterals of the two financing/loans, but
these are differences between the asset classes that are backing them. I thought I should not have to explain them because I thought you would know them, you sound quite learned. Regardless I had to anyways because apparently you didn't get it.
The comparison between ASB-financing and mortgages was made so
would-be property investors are allowed to rethink their decision before investing in properties, when they can instead get an ASB-financing.
In the end of the day, you are just being pedantic. Both are asset-backed financing/loans, and they can be compared for us to see the similarities as well as differences between them. They are not the same, but similar in which
a Bumiputra should consider getting one over the other based on his risk appetite, holding power, and general financial situation.
Thanks for giving me the opportunity to reply, and sorry if I sound annoyed. Personal finance is simply my passion and my business.
Holy Wall of text. And yet you still asked people about their birth year even after they said turning 35 this year.