Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Is it necessary to got buy an insurance?

views
     
hamster9
post Apr 6 2008, 09:32 AM

CFP
*******
Senior Member
2,251 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: on da move with 3G technology



QUOTE(Dyong @ Apr 4 2008, 04:55 PM)
I differ here.

SCENARIO A (ACCIDENTS/ permanent disability INSURANCE)
imagine like this, u got an accident... touchwood.
u not dead ... phew. BUT you are paralysed from waist to leg. Doctors have classified u having permanent disability. u are not eligible to work anymore.

1) what going to happen to ur earning ability ?
U earn RM 2 K a month. RM 24 K a year. who going to pay u for the next ten years ? thats a total of RM 24 K x 10 years = RM 240 K. Dun forget the inflation. 
2) if u dun have more income coming, who going to pay for ur expenses ?

IF you have interest/ investment income of 24K per year, you do not need to worry for this.
Meaning to say, gaining interest of RM2K per month from investments? Mind introducing what investment fund you are talking about? I would dearly like to invest some money there and not work 9 to 5 anymore. yawn.gif  The only thing I know only by playing forex can gain me this much. But what about the noobies in forex?
SCENARIO B (MEDICAL INSURANCE)
U were involved in accidents or u need to do operations. to reconnect ur hand or ur legs. who going to pay for the hospital bills (RM 10000) ?

Yes, if you have 100-200k standby funds, you do not need to worry for this.

Do you personally have such funds in the first place? I know I don't and many of us either

If it happen in the midnight around 2am. Where you going to get that much of money ? Bank ?

Yes, credit card cash advance/ ATM and you can withdraw the day after.
So happens if my salary bank is Maybank, I can get my money out but not after midnight. And so happens that I'm already unconscious on the hospital bed, who will pay when my parents are not from KL and my friends are uninformed about the incident?
Another penny for your thoughts?

You answer is the typical solicitating that normally insurance agent use to sell their products.
What they fail to see is that as your net worth increase, with a substantial amount of liquid cash, one do not need much insurance.

The whole idea of insurance planning is just a subset of your overall financial planning, not everything.

Judging from the statement above, I believe you have experienced bad insurance agents who are being product pushers. Adequate is needed not excessive.
*
QUOTE(cherroy @ Apr 5 2008, 11:21 AM)
Bare in mind also, there is some limit that you can claim from the insurance, particularly medical side. So better check it out before buying it. Yup, medical insurance somehow is quite essential nowadays due to sprilling up of medical cost. But buy appropriate insurance until you can afford, don't overbought insurance until you are not aware of especially for those with tight budget every month one.

Billionaires like Warrent Buffet and Bill Gates probably don't need insurance.  biggrin.gif
So may be that's true, insurance is not essential and necessary for those really really rich one. One month interest in the bank already worth millions, still want insurance to cover it?  laugh.gif
*
Maybe they have their fingers insured for millions for the tiniest cut in their hand like Richard Clayderman. Or be like Jennifer Lopez who insured her butt for USD1 million(correction: USD 1 billion sweat.gif ). Probably Bill Gates would have to for his hands to sign cheques and type some geek coding
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


QUOTE(cherroy @ Apr 5 2008, 11:45 PM)
Talk is easy as we know some insurance is somehow essential.
But in real life reality, things are not as simple as that when it comes to $$ term.

Really rich one doesn't need insurance, serve not much purposes anymore. Poor one, can't afford it, life is cruel sometimes, it is not a perfect world.
Insurance somehow better is a product that best suit for middle class people.
*
Why does the rich gets richer and the poor gets poorer? Even if they are rich, they still keep money in great value and to them, why not fork out say a few thousand to get oneself protected and skip paying the unnecessary bills? In the rich mind, everything is about profitability and feasibility. They are thrifty in their money, which is that's why they are rich.

Cases are many in London that wealthy people dies leaving a huge amount of assets and insurance money to their pets doh.gif

I believe there are many products can be tailored in insurance accordingly to your budget. Just the matter of your luck with your insurance agent. In my case, I encountered 2 agents of the same company and one of them proposed me a higher insurance package which I couldn't dearly afford for my dad. Another agent showed me everything and asked how much I want to protect my dad for, do I need hospitalization allowences? etc etc until the price suit my liking.

This post has been edited by hamster9: Apr 6 2008, 10:08 AM
hamster9
post Apr 6 2008, 10:22 AM

CFP
*******
Senior Member
2,251 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: on da move with 3G technology



QUOTE(xeNOS @ Apr 6 2008, 10:16 AM)
the actual use of insurance for (poor to middle class):
1) Protect our income.
2) Secure food on the table, shelter and clothes for our family.
3) Protect our hard earned money.
4) As a savings for retirement/child education

the actual use of insurance for (Upper and rich class):
1) Increase their business value
2) Provide a business continuation plan
3) Increase their assets

so, its on how we look at it... so if a person has responsibility (for himself and others) life insurance is a MUST! unless money is not the question.
*
lol...i'm just thinking to get buried or even cremated in Nirvana Memorial Park is already RM15K sweat.gif I wonder where to get such money after settling medical fees just like my late grandpa. Total cost already RM 30K inclusive of hospitalisation. I hate the insurance agent that only sold him the endowment plan and not medical card that we have to pay ourself the high medical fee from SJMC. To recover from our family revenue took us a long time.
hamster9
post Apr 8 2008, 04:34 PM

CFP
*******
Senior Member
2,251 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: on da move with 3G technology



QUOTE(dreamer101 @ Apr 7 2008, 09:32 PM)
dr2k3,

<<what i mean is that if those 5-6k(yearly) are tax (must goto government pocket) might as well buy insurance for "protection"?>>

This is TAX RELIEF.  It reduces your taxable income.  The following number is in annual aka yearly.

So, let say you earn 60K and you buy 6K premium worth of insurance.  Your taxable income is reduced by 6K.  You ONLY save 13% of 6K = RM780.

So, why spend 6K on insurance just to save RM780 in tax?

Tax savings from insurance is another bunch of BS used by insurance agent.  Do not get conned.  Know how to calculate.

Insurance agent never bother to tell you the whole story.

Dreamer
*
For a self employed, it may not be feasible.

But for those who are working/ employed, isn't it one form that we can have tax relief? RM780 is quite a big figure to think about also. Spend as in what? We are spending in term of our protection with in the meantime get a tax relief. Same goes as I step into MPH and buy myself some books and get tax relief from it. I get the product and also the tax relief.

What other things i can get from tax relief? hmm.gif
hamster9
post Apr 9 2008, 10:17 AM

CFP
*******
Senior Member
2,251 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: on da move with 3G technology



QUOTE(dr2k3 @ Apr 7 2008, 07:11 PM)
erm...i never got tax before...is it yearly tax or monthly ??

what i mean is that if those 5-6k(yearly) are tax (must goto government pocket) might as well buy insurance for "protection"?

if 5-6k will be gone anyway which 1 would you choose tax or insurance
*
QUOTE(dreamer101 @ Apr 7 2008, 09:32 PM)
dr2k3,

<<what i mean is that if those 5-6k(yearly) are tax (must goto government pocket) might as well buy insurance for "protection"?>>

This is TAX RELIEF.  It reduces your taxable income.  The following number is in annual aka yearly.

So, let say you earn 60K and you buy 6K premium worth of insurance.  Your taxable income is reduced by 6K.  You ONLY save 13% of 6K = RM780.

So, why spend 6K on insurance just to save RM780 in tax?

Tax savings from insurance is another bunch of BS used by insurance agent.  Do not get conned.  Know how to calculate.

Insurance agent never bother to tell you the whole story.

Dreamer
*
QUOTE(dreamer101 @ Apr 8 2008, 07:05 PM)
hamster9,

1) Spending RM87 to save RM13 is not a smart decision.

2) Oops.  I forgot.  You are another insurance agent.

3) For a person earning 60K per year, there is very little reason to spend all the way to RM6K on insurance annually.

earning RM60K per year, it is FINANCIALLY STUPID for a person to buy medical insurance that PAY RM5K.

Dreamer


*
Dear Unc Dreamer,

I am in reply to the above statement where dr2k3 mentioned about the whole tax thingy for insurance (which, i would like to emphasize, insurance in general, and not medical, life, or whatever terms there is) The scope is general which irregardless on what he is buying. My point is the saving from tax. That's all.

Secondly, what makes you think when I am giving my point of view in the good part of insurance (which I personally experienced myself in the loss of my family members and acidents that occured to me) makes you think I am an insurance agent?

dr2k3 was giving an example of spending RM6K, it's his choice, not ours. All we can go is advice him to lower down or don't buy at all. Well of course those insurance agent would be laughing his way submitting cases. RM6k annually which means RM500 per month. We all know that's a lot of money. But I believe he is just giving an example.

Rather the word INSURANCE is a taboo for you, why not have a look on other people's opinion instead?

QUOTE(dreamer101 @ Apr 8 2008, 09:40 PM)
kockroach,

1) I did not have to BUY insurance.  My job has extensive life, medical, disability insurance included.

2) I save 50% of my gross income.  So, at certain stage, I am self-insured.

3) The problem I have is insurance is only worthwhile for me if the coverage far far above 200K.  But, those insurance premium is so high that it is not worth the money.
Do not misunderstand me.  I do not say people should not buy insurance.  But, the problem is

A) People overspend on insurance until they have NO SAVINGS.

B) People buying WRONG KIND of insurance with WRONG coverage.

C) Insurance agents only interested in SELLING as opposed to EDUCATING people on the right kind and right amount of insurance to buy.

For example, why buy life insurance on children?? They generate NO INCOME.  Their death represent minimal NEGATIVE financial impact.  You MAY BUY medical insurance if you have NO COVERAGE from your job and you can get a good deal.

Why buy medical insurance that cover up to 30K if you have 100K in the bank?

Insurance is for RISK MANAGEMENT.  You only buy it to protect

1) Things that are likely to happen.

2) Things that have HIGH FINANCIAL IMPACT to you

For young people, the worst case FINANCIAL disaster is disability aka you cannot work.  But, you could cover this via Personal Accident or Disability protection.  So, which one more likely to happen and which one give you the best deal (premium versus coverage)?

I started an insurance thread but too few insurance agent is willing to educate as opposed to selling.

People SPEND A LOT of money on insurance but SPEND TOO LITTLE time in studying about this subject.  So, they lose a lot of money unnecessary in the process.

Dreamer
*
This I would agree. Finally unc dreamer explained things in full. I personally was struggling in paying my insurance when I was jobless and my business was shaky. What's best advice is to think it over what do we really need?
hamster9
post Apr 9 2008, 12:01 PM

CFP
*******
Senior Member
2,251 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: on da move with 3G technology



QUOTE(dreamer101 @ Apr 9 2008, 10:28 AM)
Dyong,

Before you buy MRTA for home, you should consider buying term life insurance instead.  You MAY or MAY NOT have the choice of doing that depending on how much down payment that you have.

There are MANY reason for this advice

A) MRTA pay for the house only.  When someone died, you NEED CASH.  If you have ONLY MRTA, the surviver MUST sell the house to get CASH.  Selling a house in a short period of time get you a lousy deal.

B) With term life insurance, you get CASH.  So, the surviver can decide to keep the house or sell it later.  With CASH, you have the flexibility of deciding what to do (funeral, college education, living expense) and so on.

C) You can shop around for term life insurance but you must get MRTA from the bank providing loan.  So, usually, you can get better deal than MRTA with the same amount of premium.

In summary, CASH is more flexible than HOUSE.  So, term life insurance is better than MRTA.

<<Many are buying a Life insurance just to get something back at the end of the day>>

So, buy a term life insurance or whole life insurance with as little cash back value as possible.

Dreamer

P.S.: I am actually advising people to buy insurance.  This is incredible.


*
Why term life insurance? How long would the term be? 20 years? But what happened after the 20 year?

So happens that my house is RM800K (around Puchong). My life insurance premium is RM250/mth for 20 years, that if anything happened to me I get RM500K. I dun think it is enough to cover for my house. So I added MLTA instead which I presumed it's different from MRTA, where I get to cover the house and have the additional money back to my family (if ever my mortgage principal ever reduce rclxub.gif ) but after 20 years, when I'm around 40 plus, don't have a life insurance. So what shall I do?
hamster9
post Apr 9 2008, 12:27 PM

CFP
*******
Senior Member
2,251 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: on da move with 3G technology



QUOTE(cute_boboi @ Apr 9 2008, 12:17 PM)
My advise is balance it up. From your postings, I assume you are in early 20's. I don't know your income/family background and I try not to be bias that 20's earn avg 3-6k (who knows ? you might be a high flyer earning 25k/mth)

My opinion is 800k (assume 90% loan @ 720k  shocking.gif ) is too much for you alone, assuming you borrow a little from parents, and the rest from you. And your life insurance is 250/mth (include medical or just plain PA?) or 3k/yr, I would say it is a bit low, when you are taking a 800k risk. I would rather up the PA to 500/mth that covers 1mil than spending on MRTA.

This does not count monthly spending, renovate house, furnish the house, electrical goods, etc. which might add another 50k-250k depending on your budget. Also other expenses like car, etc.
*
none from parents. just a joint with me and hubby. earning varies based on how good the business is (in my part). life as in term life insurance. It's a family protection plan. Not medical. Not accident. It's pure hard cash when I die/ hubby dies( 2 different policy).

just a note...medical and accident plan are considered general insurance and has nothing to do with life. Life only covers death, TPD and critical illness. Correct me if i'm wrong.
hamster9
post Apr 12 2008, 12:26 AM

CFP
*******
Senior Member
2,251 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: on da move with 3G technology



QUOTE(b00n @ Apr 11 2008, 03:57 PM)
What do you meant by the "parts" doesn't cover? So if it doesn't "cover" than what's the use even if you got it back then?
*
i guess what he means is that after something happens to the spine only he get the insurance, of course the insurance company wont cover his spine in case of other prolonged injury from there. Insurance company also wan jaga their rice bowl tongue.gif
hamster9
post Dec 27 2008, 09:35 AM

CFP
*******
Senior Member
2,251 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: on da move with 3G technology



QUOTE(dreamer101 @ Dec 26 2008, 08:34 AM)
lin00b,

Let's say you have 1 million. 

1) Why do you want to buy life insurance of 100K??  Additional 100K will not make a difference to your family.

2) How about life insurance of 1 million?? The premium will be so high that it costs a lot of money.  Aka, in general any life insurance more that 200K, the premium increase exponentially.

There reach a point where you have so much money that

A) The coverage has to be SO HIGH in order to make a difference

B) At that coverage, the premium is SO HIGH that it is not worth the money.

C) You have ENOUGH MONEY that the payout in life insurance WILL NOT make a difference in your family life.

You MAY buy critical illness insurance when you have 1 million.  But, life insurance may no longer make sense.

Are you another insurance agent??

By the way, do not do "BAIT and Switch".  Be specific, what kind of insurance are you talking about??  I was VERY SPECIFIC.  I was talking about life insurance.

Dreamer
*
Dear Dreamer,

I've checked with my system and finds that what you claimed to be as bolded is WRONG.

Here's my system work out:
I take in assumption of 45 years old, male
sum assured, RM1mil, yearly premium RM9600, monthly RM840
sum assured RM500K, yearly premium RM4800 , monthly RM 420 (notice, it's half, thus the ratio is the same)
sum assuered RM250K, yearly premium RM2400 monthly RM RM210

It's like in exchange of RM100 sum assured I need you to pay RM3 to me first.

Also there is a difference between having so much money at a certain point of time and having so much money constantly.

QUOTE(convivencia @ Dec 26 2008, 04:01 PM)


Don't say this can't happen. Remember what's happening to AIG?

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
so, when AIG in USA tumbled, were we affected here in AIG Malaysia? Did you hear any lay offs in AIG Malaysia? Did many policy holders line up to cancel their policy?

Pls read up on Bank Negara rules towards all insurance company operating in Malaysia and see where does the policy owner's money is being channeled to.

QUOTE(dreamer101 @ Dec 26 2008, 11:54 PM)
lin00b,

I disagreed with that.  You are missing ONE important parameter in the consideration.

1) How much coverage do you NEED??

It is a WASTE of money to buy more insurance coverage than you need.  You are throwing money away.

The coverage need to be

A) High enough so that it actually helps when the incident happen.

B) Low enough so that the premium is affordable.

In general, 10 x Annual earning is the MAX life insurance that you should buy.  Because life insurance's premium above 200K is so high, you may need to lower that too.

2 X Annual earning is the minimum life insurance that you should look at.

So, the RIGHT coverage is usually between 2 X Annual earning to 10 X annual earning and 200K or below.

Most people buy TOO MUCH life insurance in Malaysia.

<< "perhaps a better way of looking at it is how much %age of your total wealth it is paying out vs how much %age of your cashflow it is consuming?">>

Using that kind of formula for typical people in Malaysia will ended up buying TOO MUCH life insurance.

Dreamer
*
i disagree and agree. Agree on the 10X annual earning etc. But does your salary stay the same for the 5-10years? Does Malaysian generally drive the same car for the past 20 years? As salary increases, the same goes with your standard of living. Upgrade from a silver credit card to a gold card with higher limits, or mayb from gold to platinum. Car upgrade, no longer driving Proton or Perodua, at least a Honda or Toyota. House, from rented to owned. From apartments to a double storey link house. These are to common upgrade we see.

Again, dear Uncle Dreamer....
I'm going to repeat as I've mentioned it in another thread. I'll be frank that I still servicing my housing loan, car loan and some credit card debts and other debts as well. There are also some cash stashed away in my bank.

2 scenarios:
1. If I can't work for a month or 2, or let's say 6 months on a worst case scenario. On labor law, I would have to resign if more than 3 months. How much extra cash I need to stash away, what seems to be my life savings, needed to be spent on my medical bills and also my food while paying my debts? Well of course it mayb a heartache coz of years savings all goes down to these.

2. What if I'm dead? I have a will but then again, the assets are first to enter the Probate to have creditors paid off. Only after that, the money goes to the living. With all my card debts, house loan, study loan, personal loans, ah long loans, well of course my house loan is on MRTA, but my car loan? If deduct whatever cash I have, ends up with zero and sometimes negative. For the very least in Insurance Act, the beneficiary gets the money, creditors hands off tongue.gif At least beneficiary can have money to sustain their living.

Does this make sense?

Furthermore, to have RM1mil protection or more, usually the insurance company would require the person to show their actual income status to be highly insured wink.gif Well, I guess none of us has reach this level yet
hamster9
post Dec 28 2008, 05:20 PM

CFP
*******
Senior Member
2,251 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: on da move with 3G technology



QUOTE(dreamer101 @ Dec 27 2008, 10:07 AM)
hamster9,

1) Show me the number for coverage of 100K and  200K.  At 250K, you are on different scale in term of premium.  You are above 200K.

Oh, yeah, I forgot. Sorry. Was rushing that day. Let's put a half of RM250K which is RM125K (to show u the non-exponential figures) based on the above 45 years old male again. The annual premium is RM1541 while monthly RM133.  For information sake, RM100K would have an annual premium of RM1233 with monthly RM107

2) Stop doing "bait and switch".  Life insurance does not cover for that too.

<< 2. What if I'm dead? I have a will but then again, the assets are first to enter the Probate to have creditors paid off. Only after that, the money goes to the living. With all my card debts, house loan, study loan, personal loans, ah long loans, well of course my house loan is on MRTA, but my car loan? If deduct whatever cash I have, ends up with zero and sometimes negative. For the very least in Insurance Act, the beneficiary gets the money, creditors hands off  tongue.gif  At least beneficiary can have money to sustain their living. >>

3) What has that got to do with life insurance??

Oh, yes. I've overlooked on that matter. My apologies  notworthy.gif  I too often used a certain product in the company which automatically has critical illness in it.

4) In general, you are in BAD FINANCIAL SHAPE if you need to buy MRTA on your house loan.  It means you buy TOO MUCH HOUSE and you cannot afford a large down payment.  In general, it is CHEAPER to do not not buy MRTA but increase your life insurance coverage.  The survivors may not want to and afford to keep the house.

I dunno which MRTA you are meaning. Probably loan incorporated MRTA. But I have life insurance taken in as MRTA with a will to state that the insurance money obtained would be for repaying the remaining of my housing loan. I believe generally in public (as not many are like you, Unc Dreamer) would only pay 10-20% of the downpayment. Furthermore I do not see any reason I should have my cash solidify into bricks and walls of my house rather to have a higher loan but yet with the extra money, I can dump into the loan. For the very least not only it reduces my interest rates but in case of any emergency, there is a flexibility to withdraw.

Personally, who do not want to keep the property? Everybody would be fighting for it anyway  wink.gif


5) All my bank A/C are joint.  I have standing instruction with my wife that if anything happen to me, she should withdraw ALL MONEY from those accounts and put into her own account.

well, very good for you sir  nod.gif

6) Given the picture that you painted, you are in a very BAD CASH FLOW situation.  So, how does paying MORE insurance premium and hope that you worth more death than alive helps??

My I-Ching master(well, of course excuse me for being overly superstitious)  tells me to have most of my cash to be around places which are hard to withdraw which I thus divided them into not liquid, semi-liquid and a very small amount of liquid money as I am a spendthrift. I would admit to that, my cash goes to shopping, travel, leisure etc which I believe some of us do fall into the category and thus not many are like you. Insurance, properties, business, mutual funds, stocks etc are some of the places where the money goes.

7) What if you are ALIVE but lost income for 6 months or longer.  We are almost reaching that point of recession in Malaysia.

Us being typical humans either strive for pleasure and avoid disaster. With all fear of recession, losing income for 6 months with being able to work isn't much of an excuse unless you are being plain egoistic without working any job lower that your previous ones.

<<Furthermore, to have RM1mil protection or more, usually the insurance company would require the person to show their actual income status to be highly insured  wink.gif  Well, I guess none of us has reach this level yet>>

That is YOUR GUESS.

My GUESS would be that YOU are underinsured if you felt that is MY GUESS  tongue.gif

<< Again, dear Uncle Dreamer....
I'm going to repeat as I've mentioned it in another thread. I'll be frank that I still servicing my housing loan, car loan and some credit card debts and other debts as well. There are also some cash stashed away in my bank.  >>

Basic rule of financial survival.  Your TOTAL LOAN PAYMENT per month cannot exceed 33% of your monthly gross income.  If you exceed that, life insurance is the LEAST of your problem.  In fact, buying LIFE INSURANCE is probably going to make it worse.

My rule of thumb is do not buy a house until you finish the car loan.

We are playing in a different league.  I have 2 years of expenses in FD and CASH.  I do not have to touch my investment for at least 2 years if I lost my job.  That is my preparation for this recession.

Dreamer

Well, with the bank stringent loan procedure, I believe to have not exceed the 33% of the monthly gross income. Just like mentioned, I'm a huge spender which the only thing that keeps me intact is servicing the housing loans etc. This is where I can't liquidify my cash instantaneously so I wouldn't be impulsive on spending. Seriously, anyone who has a certain passion of hobby would never have a second thoughts into getting the equipments they want.

Yup, we are in a different league. I would change cars every 3-5 years but I'm not willing to pay more based on my own calculation time over money value. Probably my dad would be fearing the banks and their blood sucking interest, would try to finish paying up the car loan ASAP while keeping the car for 15 years or more. If so, I do not see any advancement in my life.

Right. 2 years of expenses in FD and CASH, but your current location? I believe not in Malaysia. How long does it take you to have the 2 years of expenses in FD and CASH? 3 years? 5 years? To constantly maintain a certain amount in the bank (since interest rates in the Malaysian bank could not even cover for the inflation rate), I believe you have to constantly top up and it would seemed to be a life savings. Wouldn't it be a waste to have your whole life savings have to be spent on a disaster classified as risk in the insurance company?

*
QUOTE(bulkbiz @ Dec 27 2008, 10:42 AM)
You should buy medical insurance....to protect urself just in case. But if you really rich....no need.
*
QUOTE(cottonkandy @ Dec 27 2008, 07:10 PM)
if you are not really rich, its suggested to get insurans but it is not necessary.

p/s. better safe than sorry.
*
If you are really rich, do you have RM180K (based on recent claims) stashed away in your safe box? Would you have the ambulance sent you to the bank to get the money out? Rich but most assets are not in liquid manner and logic thinking would be they would keep much in the savings account which have them little interest. wink.gif

My 2 cents
hamster9
post Jan 1 2009, 10:22 PM

CFP
*******
Senior Member
2,251 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: on da move with 3G technology



QUOTE(dreamer101 @ Dec 29 2008, 11:39 PM)
hamster9,

1) We are NOT in the same league. 

2) Average GROSS SAVING RATE in Malaysia is 33%.  So, how normal are you??

3) Most people that I know is in the average 50% gross saving rate.

4) I save 50% of my gross income for the last 10 years.

5) How do you know that 2 years of expenses is equal to how many % of my total asset??  In fact, I excluded my 2 years of expenses as ANY part of my asset.

<<Would you have the ambulance sent you to the bank to get the money out?>>

6) Why do I need to do that?? I keep a few K at home and I have a credit card.  Most of my family can muster up a few K easily.  We are NOT in the same league.

<<Oh, yeah, I forgot. Sorry. Was rushing that day. Let's put a half of RM250K which is RM125K (to show u the non-exponential figures) based on the above 45 years old male again. The annual premium is RM1541 while monthly RM133.  For information sake, RM100K would have an annual premium of RM1233 with monthly RM107>>

7) Are those quote = term life insurance or whole life insurance?

<<I dunno which MRTA you are meaning. Probably loan incorporated MRTA. But I have life insurance taken in as MRTA with a will to state that the insurance money obtained would be for repaying the remaining of my housing loan. I believe generally in public (as not many are like you, Unc Dreamer) would only pay 10-20% of the downpayment.>>

8) People that I know pay enough on down payment to avoid MRTA.

<<For the very least not only it reduces my interest rates but in case of any emergency, there is a flexibility to withdraw. >>

9) You do know that in many cases, bank can cancel your credit line with little or no notice.  Please check your loan to confirm.  This has happen to many people in USA.

<<With all fear of recession, losing income for 6 months with being able to work isn't much of an excuse unless you are being plain egoistic without working any job lower that your previous ones. >>

10) Let's assume that instead of working as professional, you work at McDonald as waiter.  Can your income support your life style without losing your house??

11) How many recession had you been through?  Survive one first before you can confidently make that kind of statement.

Dreamer
*
For what I can say if there is anybody who can do the same thing as you are saving without going out to enjoy, say at age 20-30, clubbing, drinking, mamaking, holiday, scuba diving, mountain biking or photography, anything which suits their interest and hobbies, plus going out on dates and movie, paying for phonebills (mayb during your time, Maxis wasn't around to suck you dry) means they are not enjoying their life. Anybody agree sez Aye!

What MRTA you talking about also I don't understand and what does it got to do with downpayment? Again I've mention that I insured the property based on their purchased value. Thus the sum assured would not go down even if I've paid an x amount when i KO.

-->How do you know that 2 years of expenses is equal to how many % of my total asset?? In fact, I excluded my 2 years of expenses as ANY part of my asset.

Well, I din said that. You self presumed. What I meant is how could u save up with the expenses and how lond did it took you? Have you factored it with the inflation rate? If comes with the inflation rate, then you would constantly need to top up. Another thing is my guess is that you are very stingy tongue.gif

calculated in term insurance. but does it matter? If you insist, I will provide for the wholelife yawn.gif

QUOTE(dreamer101 @ Dec 31 2008, 10:55 AM)
lin00b,

1A) Life insurance benefit the survivor.  It does not benefit ME.  So, why should I contribute more when I die??

1B) The GREATEST LUXURY in life is TIME.  My current plan is to early retire.  I do not plan to work for money for my whole life.  And, the flexibility to do what I want and when I wanted.

3) I had seen people do that too.  And, the person that lived with parent contributed towards support of their parent too.

Life insurance is for RISK MANAGEMENT.  It is used to control risk that you DIE while your dependent is STILL rely on your income.

For people that save 50% of their gross income, they only live on 25% of their income.  For every year that they worked, they save 2 years worth of expenses.  After 5 years, they had saved at least 10 years worth of expenses.  So, even if they died at that moment, there are enough savings to last 10 years.  So, how does insurance comes into play for a person like me that had least save 50% for the last 10 to 15 years??

It is TOO LITTLE and TOO LATE.

I had at least 2 years of expense in savings.  And, my investment portfolio far exceed that.  I am aiming for early retirement in a few years aka I have enough passive income so that I do not have to work.

So, if my income level is the same regardless of whether I am alive or death, why should I buy life insurance to protect my income??

Death represent NO RISK to my income.

Critical illness insurance may make more sense to me.  Critical is more a REAL RISK to me.

Insurance is USED for RISK MANAGEMENT.  You do not buy insurance for THINGS and RISK that does not affect you financially.

Dreamer
*
ok... I believe you are taking the term insurance as the tip of the iceberg. What you mentioned is for life. Some people may not need just life. Some may need PA, and some 36 Critical Ilness and some medical card. What you are terming into is only life insurance which not many would know, that they generalize insurance as just life insurance or PA only etc.

QUOTE(b00n @ Dec 31 2008, 01:45 PM)
Dreamer's opinion is more towards buying the "right" insurance.
The radical thinking of:
1) Do you need one?
2) Can you afford one?
3) Which policy to choose and which is suitable? (in this case, does one really need life insurance?)
*
the right insurance, first we need to define the term insurance first before anything else. What kind of insurance? That's the real question wink.gif

QUOTE(dreamer101 @ Dec 31 2008, 08:14 PM)




The PROBLEM in Malaysia is that they bundle everything (life, PA, disability, medical, critical illness).  So, it is harder for a consumer to shop for exactly what they want and need.  So, insurance can make MORE MONEY out of YOU.  It is NOT in their best interest to make you a smart consumer.

Dreamer
*
Let me tell you the problem in Malaysia. People want cheap and good which ends up the agent just bundled them up into an investment link policy which is so far cheaper of all in one compared to traditional policy wink.gif

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0252sec    0.39    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 27th November 2025 - 01:31 AM