Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Is it necessary to got buy an insurance?

views
     
cherroy
post Apr 5 2008, 11:21 AM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
Staff
25,802 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


Bare in mind also, there is some limit that you can claim from the insurance, particularly medical side. So better check it out before buying it. Yup, medical insurance somehow is quite essential nowadays due to sprilling up of medical cost. But buy appropriate insurance until you can afford, don't overbought insurance until you are not aware of especially for those with tight budget every month one.

Billionaires like Warrent Buffet and Bill Gates probably don't need insurance. biggrin.gif
So may be that's true, insurance is not essential and necessary for those really really rich one. One month interest in the bank already worth millions, still want insurance to cover it? laugh.gif
cherroy
post Apr 5 2008, 11:45 PM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
Staff
25,802 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


Talk is easy as we know some insurance is somehow essential.
But in real life reality, things are not as simple as that when it comes to $$ term.

Really rich one doesn't need insurance, serve not much purposes anymore. Poor one, can't afford it, life is cruel sometimes, it is not a perfect world.
Insurance somehow better is a product that best suit for middle class people.
cherroy
post Apr 7 2008, 09:16 AM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
Staff
25,802 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(clsiluf @ Apr 7 2008, 09:07 AM)
dreamer, that day i was approaced by my friends who a GE insurance agent ...

he intend sell me a saving plan, said put in RM3.8k, 10 years later can take back money, 1 year return is 7%, so is this another BS investment ? means as u always said, why pay more komisen to insurance agent if i can buy those investment plan like PT myself ?
*
Normally, it is projected, not guaranteed, bare in mind.
cherroy
post Apr 7 2008, 11:11 AM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
Staff
25,802 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(dr2k3 @ Apr 7 2008, 10:29 AM)
erm.....for those with 4-5k per month = 48-60k

taxable income 11% or 12% or 13% i dont know....is like 4-7k alredy
if not wrong i saw in tax thingy form that 1 year u can deduct tax up to 5k or 4k with insurance

or am i wrong?
*
6K, LHDN site has a complete chart various tax relief allowed.

http://www.hasil.org.my/melayu/bm_NO2_1_1E.asp


cherroy
post Apr 7 2008, 11:32 AM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
Staff
25,802 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(Colaboy @ Apr 7 2008, 11:23 AM)
not all insurance agent are that way . . . but i can see alot are just stressing on the advantages
& not goin into details of the policy. Well there is something which protect the consumer called the "cooling period" which is 100% money back guranteed. After the policy is aproved within 14 days, if any doubt you might have consult your agent/maybe some other agent or op for a refund.
*
I agree not all, but there are high % of it. Most of them, just try to 'scare' people about 'what if xxx happens to you', then insurance wil protect you, rather than explain the details and scope of the particular insurance that customers need. Everyone needs for insurance is different which depends on individual situation. Just like a single person without any dependant, death is not primary factor to be insured on, but PA on permanent disability or medical is more important than death.
Even in this forum, there are plenty of posts like that before.

Just like previous post some forumers told him/her that it can yield 7%, but didn't state it is actually 4% + 3% (projected) as you said, then it is somehow mislead customers already without telling the truth and details behind.

Also, I bet not many people knew the 14 days cooling off period as well, a failure of insurance agents to explain properly and details to the customers.

Don't get me wrong, there are plenty of good agents like you in the market, just view out some experience on some bad agents that had approached me before as well as some agents that posting in this forum as well.

This post has been edited by cherroy: Apr 7 2008, 11:35 AM
cherroy
post Apr 7 2008, 09:29 PM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
Staff
25,802 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(dr2k3 @ Apr 7 2008, 07:11 PM)
erm...i never got tax before...is it yearly tax or monthly ??

what i mean is that if those 5-6k(yearly) are tax (must goto government pocket) might as well buy insurance for "protection"?

if 5-6k will be gone anyway which 1 would you choose tax or insurance
*
Annually.

It depends. If one bought some non-essential and necessart insurance, it can be like burning money only.

For eg.
You bought 6K of non-necessary insurance, the relief of 6K (if you are in highest tax bracket of 28%), it means 1.68K safe on tax.
But you 'burn' 6k to save 1.68K, is it considered a wise move? You still 'burn' 4.32k.

Yes, if you bought some necessary and essential for your needs and affordability then you can save a bit from the tax relief. (for tax bracket in 28%)As paying 6K mean effective you are paying 4.32k only.

The first criteria to consider is the insurance whether one actually needs it or not and affordability side, not the saving on tax relief side.
cherroy
post Apr 9 2008, 03:58 PM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
Staff
25,802 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(g00glesYYl @ Apr 9 2008, 03:25 PM)
B) BTW, a good manager should never be busy.  Read up on "one minute manager" if you are interested.
C) Obviously, you have never met a good manager before.
-> haha, u must be kidding me, a manger should not be buzy? U are taking about the those supermarket's manager, whom sit there waiting customer to come?

A) Do I need insurance??
B) If yes, how much and what kind?

i have read some books, they are mentioning "good financial planning" should have the below:-

EPF 30% -> for retirement
FD  15% -> for emergency fund
Unit Trust -> 20% This is better than EPF and FD
Home -> 15% rental
Share -> 10%
insurance -> 10% protection/saving/retirement

*
I agree on the part of a good manager should never be busy most of the time.
It just means that the manager has properly manage their sub-ordinate and already ensure smooth running of the task under him/her, so don't need to busy all the time.
A manager is hired to manage not for working (I meant work like supervisor and operators)

I think the numbers should be a reference only, as it all depends on individual situation.
Unit trust doesn't mean is better than FD or EPF, if one enters the wrong point either. It is same to share, if one doesn't have the knowledge in share, then skip it also no harm done, it is better to earn less than losing money in stock market with no idea which stock to buy. Not every stock is good and making money one.

Everyone is different, so needs the risk exposure is different, but it is same important to everyone to have kind of emergency fund and saving.

Just my 2 cents.
cherroy
post Apr 10 2008, 10:54 AM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
Staff
25,802 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(cute_boboi @ Apr 10 2008, 10:42 AM)
Sorry, I would like to chip in based on some actual case.
I assume medical include the hospitalisation, surgery, anaesthetic, x-ray, MRI, CAT, ICU, HDW, etc. IINM, there are fine print stating claims can only be done over 3 yrs, i.e. 200k / 3 = 66,666 allowed per year.

e.g. If you are in critical condition and need surgery + bla bla bla which comes up to 100k, you can only claim 66k and fork out 34k yourself. Hence, you got balance 133,333 to use from next year on wards.

Read the fine prints, I'm not sure most of the insurance has change this policy or not. For those agents here, please consult your principal and verify it.

Unlikely to happen, as most of us would prefer to prevent accident from happening.
e.g. kidney disease and need to follow up regularly. Check the fine prints again whether the insurance covers pre and post treatment, like dental checkup (for chemo patients), blood test, biopsy, etc.

Unlikely to happen, as most of us would prefer to prevent accident from happening.
Yes, and later after a few months/years, they decide to terminate the policy.  doh.gif  Zero/Negative returns .
*
Yes, people don't read the fine print while some agents don't explain the max they can claim for.
Also I saw a relative that facing some surgery due to certain problem then after claiming the medical insurance for it, afterwards, the insurance company no long accept her medical insurance anymore even though she wants to buy it, but she is blacklisted by the insurance company mainly because the problem can be re-occurenced.

People always (not all) taught after they bought medical, then everything is covered already, don't need to worry. Then when situation really occur then only said insurance cheating one. Don't get me wrong, medical insurance is somehow essential but it doesn't mean it will cover everything. Also bought according to one's needs and affordability which is the most important.



cherroy
post Apr 12 2008, 08:53 AM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
Staff
25,802 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(hamster9 @ Apr 12 2008, 12:26 AM)
i guess what he means is that after something happens to the spine only he get the insurance, of course the insurance company wont cover his spine in case of other prolonged injury from there. Insurance company also wan jaga their rice bowl  tongue.gif
*
Even he bought the insurance before, and manage to claim for the spine medical, after claiming, insurance company might not renew or accept coverage on this part. <-- this is quite common practice for insurance company as they view you are the high risk insurers.
It is not like you want to buy or cover, then insurance company must accept.

It is same with my relatives, the medical insurance company didn't want to accept her anymore (posted previously).

This post has been edited by cherroy: Apr 12 2008, 08:54 AM
cherroy
post Apr 16 2008, 11:43 AM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
Staff
25,802 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(darthvader98 @ Apr 16 2008, 01:43 AM)
To avoid interruption of medical coverage due to claims, it's best to get a medical plan with guaranteed renewal clause. I believe this is only offered by the life insurance companies.
*
Got such thing of guaranteed renewal clause of medical insurance?

To clear up the medical and PA insurance

Medical insurance -> purely cover medical cost but not compensating lost of income.

PA -> cover lost of income due to accident case. But if one cannot work because of disease then PA won't pay you a single cent.
Remember PA only cover case due to accident, anything happens not due to accident (like sick or diseases etc), PA won't cover one. That's why PA insurance is cheap compared to others types.

This post has been edited by cherroy: Apr 16 2008, 02:20 PM
cherroy
post Apr 16 2008, 03:03 PM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
Staff
25,802 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(Colaboy @ Apr 16 2008, 02:57 PM)
yes there is the Guaranteed Renewal clause for medical insurance . . .
which mean you need to buy a term . . . . for example up to age 70 / 80.
Mention is the previous post, there is 2 types of medical insurance now.
The renewal basis & term basis.
*
Thanks for the information, no aware of it.

How does it works actually? mind to explain briefly. Thanks in advance.
cherroy
post Dec 26 2008, 04:36 PM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
Staff
25,802 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(lin00b @ Dec 26 2008, 04:27 AM)
if you have no money and no insurance, if you die, your family get 0
if you have no money and insurance for 100k, if you die, your family get 100k (enough to cover them)
if you have 100k and no insurance, if you die, your family get 100k (same as previous case)

however,
if you have 100k and insurance for 100k, if you die, your family get 200k (they will have additional 100k as buffer/investment in case of any more unforseen incidents)

unless you can find another method of generating a lot of money quick, i still think life insurance is a must.

of course, some will say that the premium if invested properly for xx years will generate more than 100k, but can you guarantee nothing bad will happen to you i nthe xx years?
*
QUOTE(lin00b @ Dec 26 2008, 01:31 PM)
i dunno, 1.1 million is still better than 1 million. i mean in terms of financial security, you can never have too much right? i suppose the cut off might happen in the billions which is mostly out of reach of most mortals here.

perhaps a better way of looking at it is how much %age of your total wealth it is paying out vs how much %age of your cashflow it is consuming?
*
Your assumption is not correct.

If you have 1 million, you didn't take up insurance, you had 1 million left for your family. (not to count those FD interest yet).
If you have 1 million, you take up insurance, you might ended up with 900K as need to pay for insurance premium, then insurance pay you 100K after you die, then your family still getting back 1 million.
Don't forget insurance is not freebie!

A lot of consideration needed to be taken into, as take up too much insurance will drain your cashflow quite severely which ended not much left for saving, while those saving can be used for others investment purpose including FD (as said don't want to risk it, can put in FD), which over 10 years, 20 years which your saving in FD already double or triple in this period of time.

Individual cashflow and situation is the ultimate factor to be considered, there is no such thing insurance is a must or not a must for everyone.
cherroy
post Mar 31 2009, 10:25 AM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
Staff
25,802 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


Please proceed discussion in the insurance talk thread. http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/376228/+420

Thanks for the cooperation.

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0289sec    0.33    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 27th November 2025 - 03:08 AM