QUOTE(zamans98 @ Oct 25 2009, 07:16 PM)
Still, even it is licensed, like in US, money still vanished, fake investment by top ranked buy in the market. What differs?
Its like having a licensed to carry gun, vs illegal gun usage. Both in the end have the same results if its wrongly used.
Does having a license to carry gun gives the right to kill others, by shielding behind SELF Defense?
I believe many eager to start their own Investment firm, legally, abide all the rules, but Malaysia is still sucks. The agencies just won't give chance to others, scaring not to protect the so called public fund, but to ensure that only certain people and group will have the to run it. Having another competitor means cutting their market lead as well reducing their profit.
In that sense, that's why foreign investment companies rather setup office in Singapore than Malaysia.
License carry gun, you won't able to prevent the abuse of it and somebody being killed because of it.
Without the license to carry gun, it is all over the place, and situation become more fearful.
That's the difference.
Even here we have lot of foumers said some pyramid scheme or con-scheme is true (and rebuff others claims), if we allow investment company can be easily set-up, I can't imagine how many people money will be conned then.
Yes, I partly agree on high restriction of investment firm set up which restrict the alternative and option as well as too protective to existing investment firm especially UT company (which lead to they can charge high service charges of 5%), but think in opposite way, if you were BNM, how can I know you (the person want to setup investment firm) are trustfulness people to run and get public money and won't varnish overnight, you also don't know, right?