Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Genting Malaysia, Resorts World

views
     
Darkmage12
post Jun 27 2008, 07:43 PM

shhhhhhhhh come i tell you something hehe
********
All Stars
17,053 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(cherroy @ Jun 26 2008, 02:31 PM)
Genting and Resorts are not famous for the dividend, kedekut company. Don't get me wrong, they are good fundamantal company, just on dividend side, if one aims for dividend play one, then they are not a good choice.
*
That's true maybe because the risk they are in and they need cash to be available to be able to cover all bets at any given time. Last year after uncle lim pass away and they declared that 30 sen dividend i thought they not kedekut anymore but this year sigh same thing again
Darkmage12
post Apr 8 2009, 10:55 PM

shhhhhhhhh come i tell you something hehe
********
All Stars
17,053 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(kb2005 @ Apr 8 2009, 10:05 PM)
Yes, Resort is good for long term investment. Genting also the same. biggrin.gif
*
This 2 sibeh kiam siap mostly capital gain doh.gif
Darkmage12
post Apr 8 2009, 11:18 PM

shhhhhhhhh come i tell you something hehe
********
All Stars
17,053 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(whizzer @ Apr 8 2009, 11:01 PM)
hmm.gif

yar..  I thought there will be div announcement but no news.  unsure.gif
*
at most also few cents only.....the last time got huge dividend was when the founder pass away
Darkmage12
post Apr 8 2009, 11:31 PM

shhhhhhhhh come i tell you something hehe
********
All Stars
17,053 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(whizzer @ Apr 8 2009, 11:25 PM)
Also I saw that they buy back shares almost daily. Probably thats where the div goes to. hmm.gif
*
What's more they also need funds for expansion
Darkmage12
post Apr 25 2009, 08:59 PM

shhhhhhhhh come i tell you something hehe
********
All Stars
17,053 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(mynewuser @ Apr 25 2009, 11:36 AM)
In malaysia, anything possible. Company making loss also their stock price increase.
*
Not only in Malaysia but elsewhere also
Darkmage12
post Apr 27 2009, 01:21 AM

shhhhhhhhh come i tell you something hehe
********
All Stars
17,053 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(Soulsareworthless @ Apr 26 2009, 03:06 PM)
If the company has good fundamentals why not?
*
In this case yes but there have been countless companies without fundamental and the stock shot up like no tomorrow
Darkmage12
post Nov 6 2009, 07:14 PM

shhhhhhhhh come i tell you something hehe
********
All Stars
17,053 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(Alan Soo @ Nov 6 2009, 12:14 AM)
but by right if big investor plan to takeover, the price should not keep on drop.
*
If i'm an investor why would I takeover a company where the prices have been speculated to feverish heights?
Darkmage12
post Dec 26 2009, 07:12 PM

shhhhhhhhh come i tell you something hehe
********
All Stars
17,053 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

lol that 5 billion in cash you want them to get taxed?
Darkmage12
post Jan 17 2010, 06:27 PM

shhhhhhhhh come i tell you something hehe
********
All Stars
17,053 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(mok thye yee @ Jan 4 2010, 12:19 AM)
yes, taxed all the 5 billion, there is this windfall tax regulation, which give the govt the authority to tax sesuka hati one.....

last time Pak Lah tax to all the IPP, but for one year onli.....

for me better for the govt to tax GENM than let them do all the lousy RPT.
*
lol tax them for cash hoarding rclxub.gif
Darkmage12
post May 31 2010, 11:53 PM

shhhhhhhhh come i tell you something hehe
********
All Stars
17,053 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(the snowball @ May 30 2010, 03:10 PM)
It is a good thing they call it off. Basically, Walker Digital is an investment mistake made by the Lim family private arm Kien Huat Realty. But, in order to reduce the loss from this mistake, they do a related party transaction and sell the failed investment to GENM to recoup the mistake. Burried deep into GENM financial statement for this period is an impairment loss for Walker Digital worth RM108million. They bought the firm at RM 227 million (at current USD-MYR exchange rate). It is about 50% write off in less than one and a half year when there is an uptick in casino business and gaming business globally.The timing of such a write off is very suspicious. These just shows that the family know it is a bad business all this while. They are waiting for a right time to write off the thing without creating much fuss i.e. a time when GENM result improve significant enough to cover the loss from Impairment Loss so that the YOY change do not look that different. Investors tend to look at the bottom line figure, when it does not fall or change too much, they would not ask "why?".The improving result in GENM give this quarter give them just the right opportunity to do so. Basically, GENM just bail out the Lim family from a bad mistake.

GENM and Genting is basically a company with a good business(Genting Highland and Sentosa) but with an incompetent and overpaid CEO that do not know what to do with the cash and put his own interest over that of the minority shareholders. It has been a long time we heard that they are looking for opportunity for acquisition, but they seem to be unable to find anything to buy or perhaps are saying that to appease the shareholder. With the current management track record in Star Cruise(Genting HK) and Genting UK, it is better for them to return the cash.

It is ok to buy into a company with bad management and sound and defensive business, but your entry price need to be low and must realize that GENM and Genting would not be able to fulfill their full potential with the current management in place. Do take note of the intensifying competition of casinos in SEA, there are new ones coming up at Phil and Vietnam. Genting Highland will largely be shielded but Sentosa will face some pressure.
*
Well they have a piece of Phil via RWM(Resort World Manila) which just hosted an APPT event. The event was tauted to be the best and most well organized Poker event so far this year in the AP region

QUOTE(the snowball @ May 30 2010, 09:59 PM)
Welcome. I think to reduce corporate governance risk, the best listed Genting Group vehicle to own is Genting Berhad cause it is directly own by the family arm, Kien Huat Realty. The rest of the companies are more indirectly related to the Lim family like GENM, so, they can do whatever they like with the company.

For Indonesia, initially Bintan Island seemed to have awarded a license to Landmark, a company which Genting have significant holdings, but, after that, some political problem and the casino license seem to be on hold or been cancelled for now. I am not really sure whether other government will allow Genting to build the casino in their country after they see what Genting build on Sentosa. Because, if you compare the Sentosa Resorts and the Marina Bay Sands, Marina Bay Sands(MBS) is really 2 or 3 times more grand than Genting. Punters regardless of rich or poor would prefer MBS because the minimum bet in both casino is the same.

I have to agree that their cash management left much to be desired. They don't know what to do with the cash, but, refuse to return to the shareholders. Now, they even waste money to buy some bank in Sri Lanka.
*
lol it seems that the crowds are doing this for now.
Darkmage12
post Jun 1 2010, 08:35 PM

shhhhhhhhh come i tell you something hehe
********
All Stars
17,053 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(RobinHood888 @ Jun 1 2010, 03:34 PM)
Mostly people go for Genting Singapore, more potential.
(personal opinion)
*
Did you read this statement?

QUOTE
if you compare the Sentosa Resorts and the Marina Bay Sands, Marina Bay Sands(MBS) is really 2 or 3 times more grand than Genting. Punters regardless of rich or poor would prefer MBS because the minimum bet in both casino is the same.

Darkmage12
post Jun 2 2010, 01:19 AM

shhhhhhhhh come i tell you something hehe
********
All Stars
17,053 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(the snowball @ Jun 1 2010, 10:22 PM)
Ya but the exposure is rather small as it is via Genting Hong Kong(formerly Star Cruise). I think Genting want to get its hand on every single casino pie in the region.
Got one thing that Genting Sentosa may beat MBS is that the parking cost for MBS is obscenely expensive. Even after they give you a discount, it is still very expensive to gamble there for a night if you are driving.
*
Well after the successful tournament I hope it will boost their exposure in the Philippines market. Anyway Star Cruise is not doing well right?
Darkmage12
post Jun 3 2010, 09:10 PM

shhhhhhhhh come i tell you something hehe
********
All Stars
17,053 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(the snowball @ Jun 2 2010, 11:16 PM)
Haha, I think I have misunderstood you previously on your meaning of exposure with my own. I believe your "exposure" means the exposure to the Phil casino to the Phil market, in this case, the exposure is huge as the Resorts World at Manila is actually part of the Phil govt plan to develop a similar Singapore IR-style resort. While I have misunderstood your definition of exposure as the exposure of GENM to RW Philipines earnings, in this case, the exposure is rather small as GENM owns 19+% of GEN HK while GEN HK in turns own roughly 50% of RW Phil, so in total the exposure to GENM is around 10% while to Genting it is even smaller at less than 5%.

But, this exposure is not exposure in accounting sense as GENM ownership in GEN HK is less than 20%, hence,based on accounting rule, it is not consolidated into GENM earnings, so no matter how well RW Phil did, it will not be reflected in GENM P &L. GENM ownership in GEN HK is actually classified as Available-for-Sale Securities(AFS). As an AFS, any changes in the share price of GEN HK need to be reflected in GENM P&L, so, you will see a huge fair value gain or losses in GENM P&L every quarter due to changes in GEN HK share price. But, if RW Phil did well, GENM should benefit from the increase in share price of GEN HK.

Actually, the accounting treatment of GEN HK kinda answer your question on the state of Star Cruise or GEN HK as it is called now. GEN HK performed so badly that it has been a drag on GENM earnings and share price that I believe the Lim family actually secretly funded famous Malaysian financier Datuk Chua Ma Yu(CMY) to take over 14% of GEN HK shares from GENM so that the result of GEN HK will not be consolidated in GENM books. This is merely cosmestic changes on GENM accounting treatment, the fundamentals of GEN HK remains bad. But, it did hide the fact somewhat from GENM shareholders that GEN HK is burning cash.I have a reason to think so as I don't think CMY have so much money to buy 14% of GEN HK plus I don't see any reason for him to splurge a significant part of his wealth to buy a NON-CONTROLLING and minority stake in GEN HK, so I think it should be funded secretly by Lim family. Haha..that's my conspiracy theory but I think it is rather valid as I don't see any other motive for CMY to spend a huge chunk of his wealth on a non-controlling stake in a cash-burning company.

As for the state of Star Cruises now, well, they have brought in quite famous private equity firm, Apollo as a co-investor for Norweigian cruise line(NCL). Hopefully, the PE firm will help them streamline NCL activities and hopefully turn it around. As PE firm exit strategy is to do IPO, perhaps we may have another Genting vehicle being listed next time. As for the rest of Star Cruises, I believe the fundamentals is still bad. Buying Star Cruise is a bad call by LKT. Perhaps, his ideas is too forward for our generation? haha..or a more valid one is that he is a pale shadow of his father.
A legal gambling business is actually not as profitable as most people think it is. Genting is so profitable because it is a monopoly. A lot of casinos in Macau apart from the big 3 (Wynn, SJM and LVS) loss a lot of money during the previos FY. This is due to the fact that a legal casino have a lot of overheads cost. Just imagine the cost of setting up those entertainment and other activities that are not profitable to attract people to gamble at their casino. All these attractions forms a huge chunk of their operating cost and is usually not profitable activities. So, legal casino is not that profitable in an ultra-competitive environment.
*
wow CMY is in play? That's very old news but I kinda forget about it until you just mention. Well sorry for the misunderstood about exposure. We can only hope that if RWM is famous it's sister casinos can somehow get the spill over effect
Darkmage12
post Jul 1 2010, 08:36 PM

shhhhhhhhh come i tell you something hehe
********
All Stars
17,053 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

As such Genting Singapore will be a good buy now? Actually Genting's UK Operation was done by Justin Leong doh.gif
Darkmage12
post Jul 2 2010, 03:21 PM

shhhhhhhhh come i tell you something hehe
********
All Stars
17,053 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(yyie @ Jul 2 2010, 02:10 PM)
LKT has one good thing compared to Francis Yeoh...
He is taking the highest pay among all the listed company CEO
*
Is this a good thing? You do know that wall street CEOs are coming under fire due to extremely extravaganza high pay and yet underperform
Darkmage12
post Jul 2 2010, 04:45 PM

shhhhhhhhh come i tell you something hehe
********
All Stars
17,053 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(cherroy @ Jul 2 2010, 03:26 PM)
I don't mind CEO's getting hundred of million, if the company is generating 7-10% consistently and sustainable dividend, and minority shareholders benefit are well taken care of.
*
In the case here the dividend is peanuts hmm.gif
Darkmage12
post Jul 2 2010, 04:54 PM

shhhhhhhhh come i tell you something hehe
********
All Stars
17,053 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(PBB boleh @ Jul 2 2010, 04:47 PM)
But this is clearly a "related party transaction" so the the controlling shareholders cannot vote, right??? hmm.gif
*
They can restrain from voting but there is nothing stopping them from voting
Darkmage12
post Jul 2 2010, 04:56 PM

shhhhhhhhh come i tell you something hehe
********
All Stars
17,053 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(cherroy @ Jul 2 2010, 04:54 PM)
Is there any rules/law stated in RPT transaction, that controlling shareholders cannot vote?

If it is, the surely a lot of RPT transaction being rejected by minorty shareholders before, but we are seeing little RPT transaction being rejeted before as far as I know.

I only know RPT needs to be declared openly to all.
*
AFAIK there is no such rule. As a company with good corporate governance the controlling shareholder would normally abstain from voting
Darkmage12
post Aug 17 2010, 10:17 AM

shhhhhhhhh come i tell you something hehe
********
All Stars
17,053 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(ooyah98 @ Jul 15 2010, 11:30 PM)
Hi
Anyone has access to below Morgan Stanley report? why the overweight call?

Genting rises on 'overweight' call
http://www.btimes.com.my/articles/20100713090947/Article

Genting Malaysia Bhd, the country’s sole casino operator, rose the most in three weeks in Kuala Lumpur trading after Morgan Stanley initiated coverage of the stock with an “overweight” call and RM3.05 share forecast.

The stock rose 1.1 per cent to RM2.69 at 9:05 a.m. local time, set for its biggest gain since June 18. -- Bloomberg
*
They just hit the forecast price today
Darkmage12
post Aug 17 2010, 06:44 PM

shhhhhhhhh come i tell you something hehe
********
All Stars
17,053 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(lowyat888 @ Aug 17 2010, 06:36 PM)
for genm there is still lag behind alot compare to the rest of the group companies that when up alot.

genting bhd price rm9 b4 split to 5 is rm45

genm price rm3 b4 split to 5 = rm15

so genm price should be half of genting bhd price, no matter what. there will be a wave coming sooner or latter or even a hidden surprise whereas alot of stockist already have little or even no interest in this counter due to very lag, slow etc. the playup on the other group counter already when up alot. the downside is very limited for the counter

some investor even have no patience to wait any longer
*
I don't remember GenM ever splited before

2 Pages  1 2 >Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0379sec    0.70    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 29th November 2025 - 07:05 AM