Oh, my first version I put Guest18 as the founder. they changed it? bugger

didnt know lowyat.net was founded by MayAnne?!?!?! OMGOMGOMGOMG
nots se7en meh?
maybe can put some lyn.net trivia...

Well, firedauz, based on the following posts, I can safely conclude your little page is screwed. I'm off.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lowyat.net



??? take that out plz. it just makes lyn look like bad for me. thanks



plz update it. thanks

This post has been edited by Calvin871989: Aug 8 2008, 06:46 PM

Relax fellas, you don't have to fix it if you don't feel like it
But whoever did the fixing before (and in the future), you have our deepest thanks for the time you took to do so
Whoever made a mess on the page: if you don't mind, I hope you will not do it again please

On another issue: Wiki is always open to be edited by anyone.
I did warn about it from the beginning about the probability of that privilege to be abuse.
In the end, its a game of make & break between the fixers vs the breakers.

Btw, the page no longer exists.

It ARE BELETED.

Don't say I didn't warn you.

I've already knew about it before you
Sauce --> http://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?showtopi...t.net+wikipedia

Maybe will create again one of these days when I have the time

Next time, come back with reliable sources, like the Kiasulanders. These Wikifags are typical reference Nazis.

This post has been edited by Parrot: Aug 29 2008, 04:50 PM

put 1st. the root of the lowyat kunta kinte...lol

This post has been edited by easyzuddin: Aug 29 2008, 09:02 PM

sorry to hear that firedauz ... hmm

what really happened actually ? there was nothing wrong with the information on wikipedia rite ?

lol you gonna create again ? anyways if you need any help just pm me k

Simple. No "reliable" sources to verify LYN's notability. The Kiasulanders are lucky their local media is bored enough to cover every insignificant thing, including their version of LYN. So basically, the our website's inclusion hinges on the willingness by the old media to report about our website.

I recommend staging something so controversial that the M'sian government has to take notice, and local newspapers report about it.

This post has been edited by Parrot: Aug 30 2008, 12:41 AM

If any attempts are being planned to revive our own wiki, please let me know. I have some experience in editting wikis.

Ooops.. how come deleted one?

How about you revive it? Sounds like a good idea...

I only know how to edit, don't know how to jump start.

Hmm, neither do I. Tried reading the "How-To's" or "FAQs"? It'll be great if someone would revive it.

No way firedauz. You didn't back up the entry? What a waste of your efforts...

It's up again now

Someone please help on the pictures, as well as updating the official reference from The Edge at this link: http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/956849

If everyone help together, we can make this work again

Eh, I didn't know it was already up. Anyway, I'm not familiar with wiki so I'll give whatever info I can from the article that might help the process.

Source : The Edge Malaysia Magazine (The week of March 2 - March 8 2009)
- a pullout that came free with the issue
- entitled "Malaysia websites that we like" dated March 2, 2009

Surfing team : Karamjit Singh and Aishah Mustapha
Editorial & design team : Ooi Inn Leong, Pushpam Sinnakaundan, Sharon Khoh and Raymond Khor

According to the editor, they started out as "Web 88" then it was Web 77 but eventually it ended up as Web 65+1. This is because they simply could not find 88 or 77 Malaysian websites, either in English or Malay, that they liked.

They have not ranked the websites yet as they are waiting for the "High-speed broadband (HSBB)" service to be rolled out. As such, the websites were listed in alphabetical order.

Their selection was based on the following criteria:

Aesthetics - look and feel (30%)
- Layout
- Text, graphics, colour
- Consistency - sections defined clearly, overall branding

Content (40%)
- Breadth of content
- Depth of content
- Freshness of content
- Archives (if applicable)
- User participation

Functionality (20%)
- In working order (no dead links, no broken page, no unclickable buttons)
- Ease of use
- Navigation (site map, easy to get to pages you want)
- Interactivity
- Searchable - easy to find information you want
- Load time, uptime (server rarely down)

Personal preference (10%)

"...but i'm nominating this for deletion because it's a non-notable website/forum. John Sloan (talk) 19:52, 9 August 2008 (UTC)"