Mar 28 2008, 10:20 AM
QUOTE(p!ssed @ Mar 28 2008, 09:53 AM)
I may be an internet bus3rd in kopitiam,
but i am helpful in health and fitness.
just drop by and ask anyone.
Let me guess...... CandleJack am I right?but i am helpful in health and fitness.
just drop by and ask anyone.
QUOTE(p!ssed @ Mar 28 2008, 09:58 AM)
how do u guys feel about my case then?
suddenly waking up to find that my account was muted for no offence i made.
and what about the last time?
when someone opened a flamebait thread with serious talk tag.
He mass banned everyone who took the bait.
This will teach everyone to think twice before taking the flamebait. Flaming is still an offence here, even if it's provoked by another person or not.suddenly waking up to find that my account was muted for no offence i made.
and what about the last time?
when someone opened a flamebait thread with serious talk tag.
He mass banned everyone who took the bait.
QUOTE(uglybee @ Mar 28 2008, 10:05 AM)
Actually I would suggest that no 1 mod can put a ban on a member. He/She should get another moderator to confirm the banning.
And also, they should create a section that they state the reason why they warn/ban the user. It cannot be just ban without telling the reason. That is why people will be upset
This would be then fair!
Stating the reason for banning/ warn is like public flogging with 3 alarm fire all threw in together. Warnings/ Suspensions/ Bans should be kept just between the moderators and member. That thing is not open for public discussions anyway, and we can see what the moderator has to say in the warn log as well.And also, they should create a section that they state the reason why they warn/ban the user. It cannot be just ban without telling the reason. That is why people will be upset
This would be then fair!
This post has been edited by Pr1me_Minister: Mar 28 2008, 10:22 AM
Quote
0.0449sec
0.67
7 queries
GZIP Disabled