Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 JetAudio VS WinAmp, Is it just me or JA has better SQ?

views
     
TShighbury1913
post Mar 8 2008, 03:10 PM, updated 18y ago

On my way
****
Senior Member
526 posts

Joined: Sep 2007
From: Putrajaya / Cyberjaya


I have been experimenting with Audio Players for the past few days in my quest to find the best player. I tried everything from Media Player Classic to foobar2000. VLC Player proved very good sound quality wise despite the low CPU usage. WinAmp as expected did amazingly well in most test but didn't impress me when it came to sound quality. It was only marginally better than VLC Player and when I put it up against my JetAudio Plus, JA blew it away. I even did a blind test to make sure I wasn't being biased because I am a big fan of JA. I tested it with a few songs from different genres and amazingly I could tell the difference 9/10 times.

Now I understand that LYN has many devoted WinAmp fans so I want to know if it is just me or is JetAudio better?

Note:

*Please note that I used JetAudio PLUS, the PAID version. Although I doubt there is a difference in SQ with the Basic FREE version.

*Also note that I tested both software without adding any plug ins. Just what came with the original installation, didnt even install new skins.

*I tested it with both headphones and 2.1 speakers. Testing on the speakers made the difference in bass quality VERY clear.
rickrick
post Mar 8 2008, 03:39 PM

Perth please be good to my business !!
****
Senior Member
505 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
From: Klang - Perth


did u try winamp with enhancer 0.17 which giv winamp a kick to another level"
just my 2 cents"" biggrin.gif
TShighbury1913
post Mar 8 2008, 03:46 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
526 posts

Joined: Sep 2007
From: Putrajaya / Cyberjaya


QUOTE(rickrick @ Mar 8 2008, 03:39 PM)
did u try winamp with enhancer 0.17 which giv winamp a kick to another level"
just my 2 cents"" biggrin.gif
*
I haven't and i don't intend to. The whole point here is for me to find one a player that plays excelllently right out of the box. I know that WinAmp is almost unmatchable after you add up the numerous plug ins but how good is it at default?
rahuldave
post Mar 9 2008, 09:45 AM

FAFC 'Forever Android Fan Club'
******
Senior Member
1,241 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Georgetown Penang


QUOTE(highbury1913 @ Mar 8 2008, 03:46 PM)
I haven't and i don't intend to. The whole point here is for me to find one a player that plays excelllently right out of the box. I know that WinAmp is almost unmatchable after you add up the numerous plug ins but how good is it at default?
*
Yes bro, I agree with you, JetAudio Plus is doing way better than winamp Plus it has good audio converter too.
TShighbury1913
post Mar 10 2008, 08:26 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
526 posts

Joined: Sep 2007
From: Putrajaya / Cyberjaya


QUOTE(rahuldave @ Mar 9 2008, 09:45 AM)
Yes bro, I agree with you, JetAudio Plus is doing way better than winamp Plus it has good audio converter too.
*
thank you...i thought i was the only one. =)
1024kbps
post Mar 10 2008, 10:13 PM

李素裳
*******
Senior Member
6,015 posts

Joined: Feb 2007



heh, all player should sound same,
if u really wana compare SQ with different players, u should not use any DSP, eg equalizer.

feel free to disagree me and ignore my post, but if u really care about what player have best SQ, visit this forum, http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/
super macgyver
post Mar 20 2008, 01:36 AM

★~13k Spam Club~★
********
All Stars
19,324 posts

Joined: Jan 2003



but if u install winamp with the in_mpg123.dll, sound experience will totally different, u should try it sinc eit is free.
blessedvillain
post Mar 20 2008, 02:40 AM

Certified LYN Hacker (C)
*****
Senior Member
847 posts

Joined: Jan 2005

woot~ jetaudio SQuality is better? mmm...i'm giving it a try!! biggrin.gif

to me, winamp SQ is average, even WMPlayer seems to sound better...to me la..tongue.gif
navilink
post Mar 23 2008, 09:25 PM

【ツ】
********
All Stars
10,783 posts

Joined: Jan 2003



havent used cowon jetaudio since very long ago...like 4-5yrs d! haha...it also has nice interface back then, but now dunno la
Im_beside_yoU
post Mar 25 2008, 03:45 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
153 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: KL <--> Tokyo Status: Retired


QUOTE(rickrick @ Mar 8 2008, 03:39 PM)
did u try winamp with enhancer 0.17 which giv winamp a kick to another level"
just my 2 cents"" biggrin.gif
*
with Enhancer WinAmp still can not beat JA (basic ver.) in SQ...
i myself use both winamp(7-year) and Jet Audio(4-year) biggrin.gif

here is my pros and cons WinaAmp/JetAudio

Winamp (free) pros.
-Media library
-Nice new skin-BENTO
-Unicode title support

Cons.
-Sound Quality! ~yup, only slightly better than Windows Media player biggrin.gif

Jet Audio (free basic) pros.
-(of course)SQ! x-bass, x-surround ...
-biggrin.gif i frequently use the timer to turnOff my Pc
-Media Center is ok <--not fully explore this features (but still Winamp's Media Library rock!)

Cons.
-the design of Default skin is boring/outdate whistling.gif
-no Unicode title support
DEz012
post Mar 25 2008, 10:54 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
574 posts

Joined: Oct 2006


My vote goes to JetAudio sure has better SQ than Winamp . Jet audio was COWON product.
TShighbury1913
post Apr 8 2008, 08:03 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
526 posts

Joined: Sep 2007
From: Putrajaya / Cyberjaya


QUOTE(Im_beside_yoU @ Mar 25 2008, 03:45 PM)
with Enhancer WinAmp still can not beat JA (basic ver.) in SQ...
i myself use both winamp(7-year) and Jet Audio(4-year)  biggrin.gif

here is my pros and cons WinaAmp/JetAudio

Winamp (free) pros.
-Media library
-Nice new skin-BENTO
-Unicode title support

Cons.
-Sound Quality! ~yup, only slightly better than Windows Media player biggrin.gif

Jet Audio (free basic) pros.
-(of course)SQ! x-bass, x-surround ...
-biggrin.gif i frequently use the timer to turnOff my Pc
-Media Center is ok <--not fully explore this features (but still Winamp's Media Library rock!)

Cons.
-the design of Default skin is boring/outdate whistling.gif 
-no Unicode title support
*
I have to agree with you. I use the timer function often too.
coolkwc
post Apr 13 2008, 03:36 AM

Fall in love with audio again.
*******
Senior Member
3,112 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
i personally feel that all media player are same in SQ in their default setting...SQ depends on good hardware, such as sound card and speaker... media player?just contribute 0.000000001%...

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0202sec    0.97    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 14th December 2025 - 01:24 PM