Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
AMDŽ Socket-AM2/AM2+ Overclocking thread (V6), Will AMD alive??
|
alive88
|
 Mar 14 2008, 12:25 AM
|
|
QUOTE(casperito @ Mar 14 2008, 12:19 AM) i also dunno... i read it somewhere.. fudzilla if im not mistaken... forgot alreadi... ~found it~ not sure the right one... http://www.fudzilla.com/index.php?option=c...d=6210&Itemid=1cooool~~~~ so, in benchmark we can see lots of different..juz like intel and amd..eventhough we can see intel pawn amd kaw2 in super pi, but in real world it doesnt have much difference..coz my friend use c2d and me x2, both play crysis without lag..its just the same..ehe  This post has been edited by alive88: Mar 14 2008, 12:25 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
digswell
|
Mar 14 2008, 12:28 AM
|
|
|
QUOTE(alive88 @ Mar 14 2008, 12:25 AM) so, in benchmark we can see lots of different..juz like intel and amd..eventhough we can see intel pawn amd kaw2 in super pi, but in real world it doesnt have much difference..coz my friend use c2d and me x2, both play crysis without lag..its just the same..ehe time winzip 1gb zip file u will see the different....... |
|
|
|
|
|
casperito
|
Mar 14 2008, 12:28 AM
|
|
|
QUOTE(alive88 @ Mar 14 2008, 12:25 AM) so, in benchmark we can see lots of different..juz like intel and amd..eventhough we can see intel pawn amd kaw2 in super pi, but in real world it doesnt have much difference..coz my friend use c2d and me x2, both play crysis without lag..its just the same..ehe yeah.. juz like GC... u bench, score kaw2.. but when in gaming, got a lot of difference... well, like always, we wait for the reviews... |
|
|
|
|
|
AMDAthlon
|
Mar 14 2008, 12:32 AM
|
|
|
Benchmark not very accurate what.Unless 3Dmark06 test ALL games = =.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TS-pWs-
|
Mar 14 2008, 12:34 AM
|
Look at all my stars!!
|
QUOTE(alive88 @ Mar 14 2008, 12:25 AM) so, in benchmark we can see lots of different..juz like intel and amd..eventhough we can see intel pawn amd kaw2 in super pi, but in real world it doesnt have much difference..coz my friend use c2d and me x2, both play crysis without lag..its just the same..ehe Folding willl make a lot lot of difference.  QUOTE(digswell @ Mar 14 2008, 12:28 AM) time winzip 1gb zip file u will see the different.......  -pWs- |
|
|
|
|
|
casperito
|
Mar 14 2008, 12:41 AM
|
|
|
[quote=-pWs-,Mar 14 2008, 12:34 AM] Folding willl make a lot lot of difference. really?? never do folding b4.... so i dunno laa... hahaha |
|
|
|
|
|
TS-pWs-
|
Mar 14 2008, 12:42 AM
|
Look at all my stars!!
|
QUOTE(casperito @ Mar 14 2008, 12:41 AM) really?? never do folding b4.... so i dunno laa... hahaha Yes. C2D 6300 2.4GHz > AMD 3800 3.2GHz  -pWs- |
|
|
|
|
|
ocz
|
Mar 14 2008, 12:46 AM
|
|
|
QUOTE(-pWs- @ Mar 14 2008, 12:42 AM) Yes. C2D 6300 2.4GHz > AMD 3800 3.2GHz -pWs-Is it in overall performance?? |
|
|
|
|
|
TS-pWs-
|
Mar 14 2008, 12:49 AM
|
Look at all my stars!!
|
QUOTE(ocz @ Mar 14 2008, 12:46 AM) Is it in overall performance?? There are compared under same WU. AMD 3800 3.2GHz is mine actually. C2D e6300 2.4GHz is my team's tailou rig. AMD takes 22 mins to finish one step while INTEL takes 16 mins to finish one step.  -pWs- |
|
|
|
|
|
casperito
|
Mar 14 2008, 12:50 AM
|
|
|
QUOTE(-pWs- @ Mar 14 2008, 12:49 AM) There are compared under same WU. AMD 3800 3.2GHz is mine actually. C2D e6300 2.4GHz is my team's tailou rig. AMD takes 22 mins to finish one step while INTEL takes 16 mins to finish one step. -pWs-the E6400 at default clock of OCed?? if default, the AMD lose badly la... |
|
|
|
|
|
TS-pWs-
|
Mar 14 2008, 12:51 AM
|
Look at all my stars!!
|
QUOTE(casperito @ Mar 14 2008, 12:50 AM) the E6400 at default clock of OCed?? if default, the AMD lose badly la... See the above post bro. I already state it clearly the speed for AMD n INTEL.  -pWs- |
|
|
|
|
|
ocz
|
Mar 14 2008, 12:52 AM
|
|
|
QUOTE(casperito @ Mar 14 2008, 12:50 AM) the E6400 at default clock of OCed?? if default, the AMD lose badly la... What do you mean by AMD will lose badly if the E6300 is default?? |
|
|
|
|
|
casperito
|
Mar 14 2008, 12:56 AM
|
|
|
QUOTE(ocz @ Mar 14 2008, 12:52 AM) What do you mean by AMD will lose badly if the E6300 is default?? if the intel @ stock and AMD alreadi OC the intel run the folding @ 16 minutes, AMD @ 22minutes... imagine the intel OCed... the folding time should be less... but still, i never fold b4.. so i dunno about it much laa.. juz from my point of view la... hahahaha This post has been edited by casperito: Mar 14 2008, 12:57 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
za_az
|
Mar 14 2008, 12:57 AM
|
|
|
Both proc bro -pWs- mention is OC-ed |
|
|
|
|
|
casperito
|
Mar 14 2008, 01:05 AM
|
|
|
QUOTE(za_az @ Mar 14 2008, 12:57 AM) Both proc bro -pWs- mention is OC-ed intel OCed @ 2.4 - 16 minutes... AMD OCed @ 3.2 - 22 minutes... if intel OCed to 3.0 - ?? minutes?? |
|
|
|
|
|
TS-pWs-
|
Mar 14 2008, 01:12 AM
|
Look at all my stars!!
|
QUOTE(casperito @ Mar 14 2008, 01:05 AM) intel OCed @ 2.4 - 16 minutes... AMD OCed @ 3.2 - 22 minutes... if intel OCed to 3.0 - ?? minutes?? Dun need to oc to 3.0, INTEL 2.4GHz already fast 6 mins than AMD 3.2GHz. -pWs- |
|
|
|
|
|
casperito
|
Mar 14 2008, 01:19 AM
|
|
|
QUOTE(-pWs- @ Mar 14 2008, 01:12 AM) Dun need to oc to 3.0, INTEL 2.4GHz already fast 6 mins than AMD 3.2GHz. -pWs-haiz... |
|
|
|
|
|
TS-pWs-
|
Mar 14 2008, 01:23 AM
|
Look at all my stars!!
|
QUOTE(casperito @ Mar 14 2008, 01:19 AM) LOL I cannot get what you meant. Sorry  -pWs- |
|
|
|
|
|
casperito
|
Mar 14 2008, 01:26 AM
|
|
|
QUOTE(-pWs- @ Mar 14 2008, 01:23 AM) LOL I cannot get what you meant. Sorry -pWs-nvm laa... penin alredi... plus now doing my java prog... extra pening.... |
|
|
|
|
|
awh85
|
Mar 14 2008, 01:55 AM
|
|
|
guys, may i know which one is better? a tighter or looser MAL value? in terms of performance. and what is the MAL actually for?
This post has been edited by awh85: Mar 14 2008, 01:55 AM
|
|
|
|
|
Quote
0.0242sec
0.34
6 queries
GZIP Disabled