err... now the bad news...
http://www.dailytech.com/Sun%20Leaks%206co...rticle10834.htm
http://www.fudzilla.com/index.php?option=c...d=5902&Itemid=1
AMDŽ Socket-AM2/AM2+ Overclocking thread (V6), Will AMD alive??
|
|
 Feb 27 2008, 07:43 PM
Return to original view | Post
#21
|
 
Senior Member
662 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: int eth 5/0/16 vlan 13  
|
|
Quote|
|
|
|
|
Feb 27 2008, 07:56 PM
Return to original view | Post
#22
|
|
Senior Member
662 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: int eth 5/0/16 vlan 13
|
QUOTE(alive88 @ Feb 27 2008, 07:54 PM) ive read that too..but no worries..its price will cost a fortune... but at least AMD fans heart are at ease... the new core can go clock to clock with penryn.. or even beat them maybe... but it will onli came out 2 half 2008 after the triple core... but we cannot be sure until at least the ES are benched... but dang nehalem... it uses HTT same as AMD.. but name it Quickstep... and even have L3 cache... aiishhh This post has been edited by casperito: Feb 27 2008, 07:57 PM |
|
|
Feb 27 2008, 08:09 PM
Return to original view | Post
#23
|
|
Senior Member
662 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: int eth 5/0/16 vlan 13
|
QUOTE(alive88 @ Feb 27 2008, 08:02 PM) yup..AMD engineer already tired after 64bit xp but don't these things got copyright? ,then intel copy it and their do nothing engineer still have the energy to flourish the plagiarized architecture  ..the same goes to phenom..hope intel learns bout it..   but to change from using FSB to HTT... doesn't will bring problem to them?? hope it would... and if Intel can copy the based concept of AMD architecture, why wouldn't AMD copy back Intel?? they want to keep their originality?? OT: i still dun understand about the copyright thingys |
|
|
Feb 27 2008, 08:20 PM
Return to original view | Post
#24
|
|
Senior Member
662 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: int eth 5/0/16 vlan 13
|
QUOTE(AMDAthlon @ Feb 27 2008, 08:12 PM) Kind off topic here about the tricore.. they juz disable one of the problem cores...I hear AMD Tri Cores gonna be released in Late March and perhaps we recived it on early April?So what do you guys think about the price?And i guess TLB bugs should be fixed.I've read somewherelse that the bug has been fixed..Btw,if the phenom still doesnt satisfied us..our only chance is...Fusion..Which is on December.Uses 45nm Processor,while Intel are switching to 32nm next year.Btw,Once reach@dec/Fusion released no more 65nm processor in the market.AMD will pull it and replaced it with 45nm.I guess say goodbye to X2 after Phenom X2 released  And perhaps phenom X2 might performs better?  im not sure about the TLB... those are called b3 batches which they fixed the TLB bug.. Fusion?? maybe its the upcoming Deneb 45nm cores... by the way.. great info about the AMD roadmap there... This post has been edited by casperito: Feb 27 2008, 08:32 PM |
|
|
Feb 27 2008, 08:25 PM
Return to original view | Post
#25
|
|
Senior Member
662 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: int eth 5/0/16 vlan 13
|
QUOTE(alive88 @ Feb 27 2008, 08:16 PM) .they never use the same chip aite?no prove..most technology are the same.. same concept.. different implementation... aiishh...AMD have their own way..like AMD,they use integrated mem controller aka on-die memory controller since 2003,and they pawn intel kaw2..now,intel wants to use on-die too..previously they use off-die,means that the northbridge act as the mem controller.. QUOTE(User_Xp @ Feb 27 2008, 08:17 PM) hope AMD can get higher clock with OC capability and large L2 and L3 cache or higher HTT or dual memory controller... the upcoming deneb will be 2.8ghz+ at stock.. and higher... QUOTE(AMDAthlon @ Feb 27 2008, 08:18 PM) From what i hear the newer phenoms will be using B3 stepping too eh..If not AMD stupidly use buggy stepping for X2 and X3 lor.. for me, at least AMD can go clock to clock with intel satisfy me... juz like back in the s939 times...Yeah i guess so..Amd X2 still being best bang for buck..So i hope it will AT LEAST give good OC capability,Larger cache at least for our hunger OCers.. .I still satisfied even it cannot beat intel very well...But at least..an improvement.the tri core still using the b2 batches.. but with one core disable... not sure for phenom x2... This post has been edited by casperito: Feb 27 2008, 08:31 PM |
|
|
Feb 27 2008, 08:48 PM
Return to original view | Post
#26
|
|
Senior Member
662 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: int eth 5/0/16 vlan 13
|
QUOTE(AMDAthlon @ Feb 27 2008, 08:41 PM) Phenom X2 is codenamed Kuma de..If tri core using b2 batches..its a buggy processor then.Btw,if the price is@RM 400 who gonna grab it?=x Since Phenom is 700++..i dun think tri cores higher than 600.. maybe they disable the core with the TLB bug...it said that the core with the TLB bug is not even stable at stock core... that why it can clock high... but the chances for a desktop proc to be able to face the TLB prob is quite little unless there are in heavy load or in a combination of activity which usually servers do.. Kuma @ RM400??? nice... |
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 27 2008, 08:57 PM
Return to original view | Post
#27
|
|
Senior Member
662 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: int eth 5/0/16 vlan 13
|
QUOTE(AMDAthlon @ Feb 27 2008, 08:53 PM) Kuma @RM400 high liao..I mean for Tri Cores..If Tri Cores 400-500 its time to save $$ le.. RM400 is not the maximum price range?? adoi... then its expensive laa..but i dun think that the tricores will be too expensive... coz now the 9500 phenom is @ RM6++ so tricores will be lower than that hopefully... |
|
|
Feb 27 2008, 09:44 PM
Return to original view | Post
#28
|
|
Senior Member
662 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: int eth 5/0/16 vlan 13
|
QUOTE(-pWs- @ Feb 27 2008, 09:35 PM) I think you misunderstand already seems someone misunderstood wat u r saying.. too self conscious perhaps... aisshhh  The P/S sentence I wrote is not for you.  The sentence is for all of our members in this thread.  -pWs-  hehehe.. sorry bro... juz giving out infos... This post has been edited by casperito: Feb 27 2008, 09:46 PM |
|
|
Feb 28 2008, 01:29 AM
Return to original view | Post
#29
|
|
Senior Member
662 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: int eth 5/0/16 vlan 13
|
QUOTE(digswell @ Feb 28 2008, 12:55 AM) Is oledi reach wall for my 4200 F2 55c idle or full load?? ...try few with HTT 281 wont load into windows..  The cpu temp is quiet high bout 55 at ide ..so i no going to stressing longtime with 32M Result for 1M Super PI...forward will looking for better cooler ..maybe WC  [attachmentid=406329] my ex X2 5200+ @ 3.2 ghz full load @ 68c on TR120.. hahahaha |
|
|
Feb 28 2008, 02:00 AM
Return to original view | Post
#30
|
|
Senior Member
662 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: int eth 5/0/16 vlan 13
|
QUOTE(digswell @ Feb 28 2008, 01:45 AM) haha..is IDE.. IDE?? mean idle?? ouch....wat cooler r u using?? |
|
|
Feb 28 2008, 02:38 AM
Return to original view | Post
#31
|
|
Senior Member
662 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: int eth 5/0/16 vlan 13
|
QUOTE(digswell @ Feb 28 2008, 02:13 AM) X2 939 with heatpipe the opty dual core one??vcore 1.55 with a heatpipe cooler shouldn't be that hot... maybe u need to change ur cooler or mod it with somemore fan... |
|
|
Feb 28 2008, 08:09 AM
Return to original view | Post
#32
|
|
Senior Member
662 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: int eth 5/0/16 vlan 13
|
QUOTE(digswell @ Feb 28 2008, 02:57 AM) yes is opty dual core stock hsf if u care less about the but want performance, go for DELTA high speed... the fan is quiet slow bout 2500 rpm. still looking better 1 fan... but if u want silent, change ur HSF to something that support 120mm fan... used it back in my opty 144/146/170 days... powerful fan, but sounds like kilang... This post has been edited by casperito: Feb 28 2008, 08:23 AM |
|
|
Feb 28 2008, 01:22 PM
Return to original view | Post
#33
|
|
Senior Member
662 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: int eth 5/0/16 vlan 13
|
QUOTE(alive88 @ Feb 28 2008, 12:54 PM) already use that..i wonder why cant run win prob maybe.. like me, i can't run any 3DMark apps... dunno why also... haih.... |
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 28 2008, 01:51 PM
Return to original view | Post
#34
|
|
Senior Member
662 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: int eth 5/0/16 vlan 13
|
QUOTE(MangKoK^ayon @ Feb 28 2008, 01:24 PM) 3dmark u must install the hotfix to run (06) ~edited~ This post has been edited by casperito: Feb 28 2008, 02:37 PM |
|
|
Feb 28 2008, 02:38 PM
Return to original view | Post
#35
|
|
Senior Member
662 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: int eth 5/0/16 vlan 13
|
QUOTE(ryudox @ Feb 28 2008, 02:36 PM) i cant run 3dmark06 on 2900XT in winXP..but win vista no problem... sold alreadi?? too powerful or too mcuh power consumption?? hehehe@casperito,i just sold your card la..hoho.. |
|
|
Feb 29 2008, 01:57 AM
Return to original view | Post
#36
|
|
Senior Member
662 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: int eth 5/0/16 vlan 13
|
tried the superprime @ C2D rig...
it runs around 13-15 seconds... this thing is good for AMD rigs.. heheh runs around 14-30ms onli... |
|
|
Feb 29 2008, 02:25 AM
Return to original view | Post
#37
|
|
Senior Member
662 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: int eth 5/0/16 vlan 13
|
QUOTE(alive88 @ Feb 29 2008, 02:09 AM) ta780g..m-atx..hmmm.. dun think so...no full atx mobo for ta780?? from wat i can see, most of Biostar mobos are m-Atx... |
|
|
Mar 2 2008, 08:12 PM
Return to original view | Post
#38
|
|
Senior Member
662 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: int eth 5/0/16 vlan 13
|
QUOTE(^KamilskaZ^ @ Mar 2 2008, 07:25 PM) yeah truly i heard only 790fx chipset doesnt have any problem but price cost like a grenade bomb well if u want something really good, u need to make holes in ur pocket la...my DFI 790FX is coming mid of this months... when its here, i'll post up some good review... hehehe... Added on March 2, 2008, 8:13 pm QUOTE(teckhooi @ Mar 2 2008, 03:33 PM) 790? u can try TA780... or u can go for the 790X.. its cheaper than the 790FX...Tak Cukup Duit Duit This post has been edited by casperito: Mar 2 2008, 08:13 PM |
|
|
Mar 2 2008, 10:44 PM
Return to original view | Post
#39
|
|
Senior Member
662 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: int eth 5/0/16 vlan 13
|
QUOTE(digswell @ Mar 2 2008, 09:45 PM) Too pricey laaa .....but the quality and performance d#mn good yes.. dang pricey.. u pay more for performance, why not.. at least its better than the asus and other brands...if im not mistaken, the DFI 790FX is a bit cheaper than the asus 790fx... |
|
|
Mar 3 2008, 01:53 PM
Return to original view | Post
#40
|
|
Senior Member
662 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: int eth 5/0/16 vlan 13
|
QUOTE(digswell @ Mar 3 2008, 01:47 PM) wan m to buy 667 ram..no way..wasting. hehehe.. triple core fever is coming...better i staby for 1066 ram for my next triple core phenom proc |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.0205sec
 0.16
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 7th December 2025 - 08:23 AM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.