QUOTE(Jean72 @ May 12 2008, 01:29 PM)
Dreamer,
It is ok to be skeptical over an agent's intention. Perhaps is a valid concern. As I mentioned in my last reply to Cherroy, if you are ever thinking of investing in UT, do some reading youself and decide. Perhaps it helps you to make a better decision in all investments you are intended to go for. Ask for the track record of the UTC (unit trust companies) for an indication of the fund managers' ability.
Talk about the % commission you need to pay to UTC for the funds invested. Do allow me to point out some facts:-
Do you know how the rich have their money managed? I am sure the rich biz man out there have no time to sit in front of a computer and start monitoring their shares/properties etc. I know a rich Dato, hoping to do his biz, of course I failed. Why, because he has his very own fund manager to manage his portfolio with a fees, of course. No one will do any job for free, especially the professional. And I am sure they charged a lot higher since the service is personal
So we ask ourselves, we only have 1k to invest, which professional fund manager is kind enough to bother me? the answer, is NO (of course!) Then how? the poor is not fit to do his/her financial planning, just because he/she failed to have million of dollars to hire a personal professional fund manager?
UT is so far one of the best possible channel for ppl like us to HIRE the professional fund manger to manage our money and to make a return that helps us to at least preserve the value of our hard earned money. The best point is regardless you invest 1k or you invest 1 million, the treatment is the same. If the 1 million is being spread to 100 counters, your 1k will be spread to 100 counters as well; and managed by the same fund manager. That's how UT works. So, how can it be free?
5-7% upfront commission is only paid when you first invest in a fund and if you kept your fund for let say 10 years or so (which most ppl do, especially the young investors), you are mainly paying 0.5 - 0.7% per year to hire your own Fund Managers. Is that too expensive? That's why it is the agent to advise the investors to keep the fund more than 3 -5 years due to this initial entry cost.
The 1.5% annual maintanance fees, is already reflected in the daily price of the fund. So if you are reading the track record of the funds, this annual fees has already been taken care off. In other words, when you see the track records of the fund, you do not need to deduct the annual fee from the return again.
Dear Jean,
Are you one with vested interest?
The current fund structure is like insurance... pooling and spreading of risk.
I do invest in some funds, but I find very uncomfortable with the compensation structure of funds management.
It should go on full performance based compensation, not the current structure of minimum + load.
To me, it's a bad sign of unable to control situation.
You may ask, how can one control the situation in Equities market.
Yeap, nobody can... so why bill us for something which cannot be managed in the first place?
Secondly, the devil in performance measurement is the emphasis in short-term gains, which leaves room for trading and manipulation. Individual transactions are not disclosed and just blind faith for us the minority investors.
Last but not least, like what you've mentioned, our individual portfolio is not substantial enough... to justify this pooling diversification.