X1 3.2MP camera, this 1 5MP camera, but not that it make much difference neway

but if u look at what the forummers posted, even under good lighting condition (e.g. in the shop), the photos somehow aren't as good as the esato's
and yeah, altho esato's photos are clear enough, but the colours fall short in comparison to nokia's
i noticed that the same thing happened with their older cybershot models too (e.g. K810)

would FW helps much? K850 users have been hoping that FW would help them with the phone's problems, but seem like those FW does not help much

i have a request to the owners of this handphone:
could u guys be kind enough to take some outdoor photos for our references here? as u all can see, esato guy seemed to be able to take some good quality photos out of this G900, i wonder if we could do the same here using the same configuration

what's the difference between B and G?
we can still use this G900 to online in hotspots areas rite?

those photos look good, but do u have any higher resolution photos?

quality is nowhere near nokia's but it is still acceptable better than K850i which is a major disappointment, which not only attributed to the camera, but also to the buggy system and flawed design

This post has been edited by cyew86: Jun 21 2008, 01:10 AM

just read at the comment in K850i thread, and u will know
just to list a few:

- camera problem (poor photo quality, some lighting issues, and some getting blank picture stuff, etc)
- fingerprint magnet
- dust could accumulate behind the protective lens
- cases of BROD

that's why the price been dropping fast, and i saw many K850i users already sold off their phones within few months of usage (some within few weeks or even days i heard)

according to the review, it wouldnt lag as bad as nokia counterpart as this phone is equipped with 128MB RAM albeit a slower 200Mhz ARM9 processor. correct me if i were wrong though

the price of G900 is dropping fast, can get one for less than rm1300
i wonder why C902 is more expensive than G900 while G900 is certainly a better phone in term of functionality and camera quality

why so expensive? for AP G700 is less than RM1000, while G900 is around RM1200
if u don't need the camera and wi-fi, just settle with G700, why pay for something that you do not need?

but in ur earlier post, u said those are AP price
but why would u think that for symbian phone it's better to get original instead?