i think the price will be their main strategy to beat off N-series..

so fast want to sell?
any problem with it or any personal review on it, care to share?

congrats, the price is very reasonable..
cheap actually, definitely a good buy..

thanks for sharing such valuable information..
will check it out..

Are the pictures taken by this phone really that bad?
can anyone be kind enough to share some pictures?

its kinda confusing as some web host takes super clear picture with this phone, but from mobilereview when comparing it to n82 n U900, G900 fails badly to meet the standard of a 5mp phone..

how bout with k850i?
i dont see any comparison with this phone..

just fyi, g700 3.2 doesn't come with autofocus..

This post has been edited by JuNz-V: Sep 4 2008, 11:15 PM

it depends highly on what you prefer..
camera quality? wifi capability? design? etc.
n also, your budget.. by not stating those, forumers here can't help u to identify which is suitable for u..

well if camera is your main thing, u should really put n82 back into consideration.. n82 has the best camera quality from your choices..
next to it, i think it will be c902.. i've compared both g900 n c902 side by side before, n the picture taken by c902 is way more attractive compared to g900's.. the image colors looks way more richer in c902, while g900 images are really dull.. however, g900's screen width beats c902, as c902's screen is quite small..
so if u want both wifi capabilities and camera quality to be excellent, get a n82..

p/s: i'm also considering n82 vs g900.. still around here to check howz g900 since its new.. but one thing i find negative about g900 is the camera, the images captured are really bad for a 5mp standard..
but don't forget, one +1 point for g900 is the touch screen and its also newer compared to n82..

This post has been edited by JuNz-V: Sep 5 2008, 03:15 AM

i've witnessed some great pictures taken from estato.. at least up to my satisfaction.. however, my concern is that not all g900 could take those kinda picture, which really confuses me a little.. can someone explain on this?
maybe upload some pictures taken personally to share with us here?

also, i've learned that at low light conditions g900 performs below par..
so i'll like to ask if there's any accessory to help g900 take better picture in the dark, eg. add-on xenon flash?

u guys with g900 still experiencing hangs and lags after updating to the new firmware??

can anyone give some comments for my above queries?
really appreciate if someone could share their views, i'm interested in getting the phone soon..

can someone be kind enough to share some pictures taken by G900.. best if there are samples taken from few conditions..
i've view images from estato.com, pictures seemed to good to be true..

@ dani_irwan,
thanks for sharing some pictures.. finally someone is willing to share
yea, as i've expected, the pictures are not even close to the ones taken by estato.com.. this has confirmed my speculation on g900..
i don't understand why pictures taken by estato.com are way more impressive..

howvever, i believe that later on the firmware might improve on the pictures quality.. hopefully, keeping fingers crossed..

u guys think that the firmware can improve on the photo quality?
i'm quite concerned on this matter, as i'm looking forward to get g900, but the photo quality is the main factor holding me back..
i feel that w810i takes better pictures than the pictures posted by dani_irwan.. i don't expect it to beat n82, but at least better than k800i/k810i la..

does anyone got g900 AP set with bluetooth?
RM1157 i dont think got bluetooth rite?

i c i c.. but okay la, price will be cheaper w/o bluetooth i assume..
moreover, ppl who needs bluetooth probably already got bluetooth..