QUOTE(defaultname365 @ Dec 14 2012, 12:32 PM)
I want HFR3D...

Bought 4 tickets to IMAX 3D (that's 4x RM30)
without actually thinking about the whole 48fps thing. Only realized it AFTER buying, silly me. If no "Into The Darkness" 9-minute preview, some more hurt. Then again, it's my first IMAX 3D film. Why can't it be IMAX 3D in HFR3D.
You'll be hurt. Censorship has not passed Star Trek yet. That's why it's omitted.
Added on December 14, 2012, 3:21 pmAh 48FPS... You have truly changed everything I believe in movies. Of course, next would be Atmos. But that's not here yet, and probably won't be so soon.
But my simple take is that 48fps changes everything. I think it's A WAY to go. Definitely a new option to undertake like how IMAX movies are made. The shots taken were spectacular and evenly paced. Action does not become blurry (i'm looking at you Captain America) and everything looks smooth. Brightness uplifted and depth levels were astounding.
I had some issue trying to see what was real and what was CGI at times. Since it was successful in blurring that line, I felt more compelled to give it more another thumbs up.
As for the movie, never followed LOTR, but I wished I had more of Bilbo Baggins. Really did. Martin Freeman was amazing, although Armitage also gave a good one. I felt the screen time was equal to everyone.
But i felt there was some issue with editing. Mainly during the Goblin one.
This post has been edited by Kyoyagami: Dec 14 2012, 03:21 PM