err btw, just updated to sp1, heh, BSOD after 1st stage of installation
Windows VISTA Service Pack 1 Discussion
|
|
 Mar 19 2008, 08:44 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Senior Member
6,016 posts Joined: Feb 2007   
|
18gb of ram on 32bit of vista wtf?
err btw, just updated to sp1, heh, BSOD after 1st stage of installation |
Quote|
|
|
|
|
Mar 19 2008, 09:35 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member
6,016 posts Joined: Feb 2007
|
just getting tons of windows border popping up on my desktop lol, most of them are unclickable + blank >_>
wlm 8.5 gone haywired and have to reinstall... some nvidia apps at crash after login to desktop, previously was working fine even im using ati card. This post has been edited by 1024kbps: Mar 19 2008, 09:38 PM |
|
|
Mar 19 2008, 11:37 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member
6,016 posts Joined: Feb 2007
|
no its not, just open task manager and see, total the physical memory still stuck at 3325mb lol.
|
|
|
Mar 21 2008, 01:23 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
Senior Member
6,016 posts Joined: Feb 2007
|
i think SP1 got some user interface improvement, but im not very sure, for those who havent have SP1 or newly installed vista pls comfirm lol,
eg Volume properties, and Folder tree view.   and the build in image viewer still suck as usual, it will make ur JPG images look worse(kinda 8bit GIF compression) than before LOL   good job macrosoft  |
|
|
Mar 21 2008, 05:50 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
|
Senior Member
6,016 posts Joined: Feb 2007
|
QUOTE(dinozilla @ Mar 21 2008, 04:39 PM) skeptical about defaultname365...hahah... if u are using vista right now, open task manager, then u should see the similar things if u have superfetch enabled(its enabled by default).in fact....look at the task manager shot Memory 2045 Cache 1825 Free 5 Which one is fake right now????  without it the Free memory would be larger. |
|
|
Mar 21 2008, 08:50 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
|
Senior Member
6,016 posts Joined: Feb 2007
|
read this
http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=948343#method5 and this http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/windows...a/bb968859.aspx then u proabaly know why cant get SP1 installed or showed in windozeupdate. |
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 22 2008, 08:44 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
|
Senior Member
6,016 posts Joined: Feb 2007
|
why dont try to reinstall nfs prostreet? my wlm 8.5 also went haywired after applied SP1, but after reinstall wlm and its been working fine till now
 |
|
|
Mar 24 2008, 09:10 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
|
Senior Member
6,016 posts Joined: Feb 2007
|
regardless how many video memory u have, u will still get 3.25GB(3325MB) if u have 4Gb of physical memory installed on 32bit of vista.
and it will reduce further if u are using on-board VGA. |
|
|
Mar 24 2008, 09:59 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
|
Senior Member
6,016 posts Joined: Feb 2007
|
QUOTE(vincentlaw @ Mar 24 2008, 09:43 PM) obsolutely totally 100% confirm wrong... totally disagree... it varies acording to ur system memory utilization... not fix..... i have 4gb memory and Asus 8800GT TOP edition 512mb graphic card.... i get only 3.5gb utilization from ram only.... post a screenshot of ur dxdiag then  or task manager also can.or may be u can explain to me, why im using 2600xt with 256mb of video memory, my total physical memory only left 3.25gb? |
|
|
Mar 24 2008, 11:54 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
|
Senior Member
6,016 posts Joined: Feb 2007
|
QUOTE(vincentlaw @ Mar 24 2008, 10:47 PM) as u wish ok it seems only nvidia 8 series user can use up to 3.5gb on 32bit OS .... here is the screenshot ... sry for those who think too big.. purposely dont want to minimise so it is CLEAR enuf to see  .... the everest ultimate is to double confirm it...  im not sure how can u get 3.25gb but im pretty sure it is cause by the rest of ur hardware..... or maybe settings.. anyway ur statement is a wrong statement... as for mine... 4 x 1,024mb = 4,096mb...... 4,096mb - 512mb = 3,584mb........ but im still wondering why 2mb missing from dxdiag... the everest is the correct value.... maybe 2mb use for BIOS or sumthg like that while ati user only can see 3.2gb, again please prove im wrong lol |
|
|
Mar 25 2008, 12:26 AM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
|
Senior Member
6,016 posts Joined: Feb 2007
|
QUOTE(vincentlaw @ Mar 25 2008, 12:10 AM) u really want ah.... then i have to do it with my old x800GT... hahaha... u want me do it with X800GT? maybe later u "ohh maybe x800 range users only can get it, mine diff cause x2000 series"... i did search on google before, as i cant find any ati card user have 3584mb of ram with 32bit of xp or vista, unless they are using x64 of xp or vista.  i will stop discuss it further as we are in off-topic already, post ur x800gt and the dxdiag+everest, and full stop lol  |
| Change to: |  0.0223sec
 0.50
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 22nd December 2025 - 07:01 AM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.