[Article] Why you dont need more then ddr2 667mhz, If you dont do 450+ fsb overclocks :)
|
|
 Jan 27 2008, 08:10 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Senior Member
3,119 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Home  
|
from two test it looks like dividers.. dont really affects performance but rather only one component, which is the "write". The other components have shot up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 27 2008, 04:16 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member
3,119 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Home
|
tips for smart computing
 dont get parts u dont need and only get what u need  for intel users. good point stated Bryan. |
|
|
Jan 27 2008, 07:30 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member
3,119 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Home
|
@kamikaz
cant u see the memory listings on the cpuid used from everest.. |
|
|
Feb 4 2008, 11:24 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
Senior Member
3,119 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Home
|
at the moment with JUST value ram i can clock 1100Mhz on cl5
nice leh. On Team Value |
|
|
Feb 6 2008, 12:09 AM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
|
Senior Member
3,119 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Home
|
@biks
my dear kiddo, welcome to crucial ram. u can do 600Mhz FSb with this fellas. |
|
|
Feb 10 2008, 07:03 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
|
Senior Member
3,119 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Home
|
@biks
im old enough mind you that 2*2GB kits dont carry chips that can go up to 1200Mhz a.k.a they dont use Micron d9gmh or any of those OC variants. |
| Change to: |  0.0172sec
 1.11
 6 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 2nd December 2025 - 12:25 AM |
Quote