[Article] Why you dont need more then ddr2 667mhz, If you dont do 450+ fsb overclocks :)
|
|
 Jan 27 2008, 03:35 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Senior Member
2,141 posts Joined: Apr 2005 From: Polaris Galaxy  
|
Now I'm having doubts about upgrading my RAM to performance ones since my proc can't do high enough clocks anyway
  I'm still curious though, what's the answer to your question?  » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « Is it due to insufficient voltage? Not enough juice to keep the RAM working at optimal status which causes the bandwidth to drop   |
|
|
Jan 27 2008, 05:31 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member
2,141 posts Joined: Apr 2005 From: Polaris Galaxy
|
Man... This is like a game of "spot the difference"
It's the Performance Level! One is at 7 while the other at 14  What does Performance Level do anyway? Mine is 6 at the moment |
|
|
Jan 27 2008, 06:02 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member
2,141 posts Joined: Apr 2005 From: Polaris Galaxy
|
QUOTE(bryanyeo87 @ Jan 27 2008, 05:34 PM) yeah thats the killah on performance, normally people overclock with them set to auto in bios, its also known as tRD in bios For Performance Level, is higher better or lower better? at 1600fsb or less it can be done with 7, or above 8 or 9, this affects a large part of the memory bandwidth, as well as stability la |
| Change to: |  0.0156sec
 0.23
 6 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 1st December 2025 - 05:37 AM |
Quote