oops, sorry there, like wolverine, im also a dumbass

The whole concept behind Deadpool was way, WAY off from what the Origin comics were based on.

Original Origins storyline:

Wade never becomes Weapon XI. Weapon XI is based off from Wolverine's son, Daken's DNA in the comics.



Yeah, you guys got it all wrong lmao.

DEADPOOL LIVES!!!!

meh, i dont really care about deadpool. eventho i was expecting more action from wade.

What kind of ratings are you guys giving this movie ? I'm expecting 7 / 10 at best ? Pros and cons ?

To those who have watched the workprint, wants the difference besides the missing CGI? Because I heard some scenes from the work print has been re-shot or something.

Want generic explosions, motorcycle stunts and lots of yelling? You got it. Want something that rivals The Dark Knight or Iron Man? Sorry.

is there any additional ending after
?

thanks

I think the answer is yes, I should not left too early after the above scene

This post has been edited by mitodna: May 1 2009, 12:19 AM

I should have known better.

When Liev Schreiber comes out of the trailer and says something like 'Ooo, shiney!' *cheeky grin*, you know you're watching a 2 hour wrestling show because this is what the spot-fest (It's not a film, it's a spot fest) is. It's a piss poor attempt of a story which serves one purpose - to testosterone it up a few notches. It isn't pretty at all. With some of the worst CGI effects in a summer movie since Race to Witch Mountain [Wolverine in the mirror scene] and the lamest reaction scene [Wolverine walking away from a blown up helicopter], I thought it was impossible to do worse than X3 but they did it. They actually managed to do it.

Whether its source material or not, I cannot judge but with classics like Watchmen, Iron Man and Dark Knight, you thought that they had finally perfected the recipe for superhero movies by making us care for them, Wolverine proves that that isn't the case.

I await reviews from Makakeke and Quickfire.

EDIT: fix some punctuation and paragraphing.

In perspective, I liked Fast and Furious a lot more than I liked this. Jackman while a better actor and more charismatic than Vin Diesel, I cared more for Dom than Logan.

This post has been edited by kobe8byrant: May 1 2009, 02:58 AM

yes. there is indeed a post-credit scene right at the end.

watched last wednesday.......nice movie and ok (if u put aside the history and what really happened based on the cartoons )

easy to understand movie - some of my girl friends said this......

I couldn't agree more.

If X3 was horrible, this movie is even more appalling.

The opening was still acceptable as it followed the official Wolverine:Origins comic, but it went totally downhill from there. Although it still hangs loosely to the Wolverine stories that we know and love, the execution was dreadful. The action scenes were predictable, yet the attempts to be cheeky failed miserably. The final battle was like a computer game - the villain had godmode + clipping mode on, and the CGI was of low quality.

Ironman actually had similar problems - strip away the comedy and fancy special effects, it's just another superhero movie with a mediocre and predictable storyline. But the success of Ironman was that it kept viewers entertained and connected to Tony Stark's character development. Wolverine, on the other hand, did not.

Oh yeah... FnF... haven't watched that yet. Tokyo Drift was actually pretty enjoyable for me but 2F2F was boring with a capital B. Paul Walker only had one expression and that's it.

Wolverine in my own opinion is a very unfaithful to the original source movie. I watched with a friend who is a huge x-men comic fan and

what they did to deadpool is really pathetic... and the melodrama is OTT.. logan said he is going to kill sabretooth, never happened, in fact there was not even a drop of blood... heck, hulk vs wolverine was much much more enjoyable than this..

one more thing,

This post has been edited by liverpool red: May 1 2009, 08:46 AM

Wolverine did not



but it was great movie none the lesss


This post has been edited by mitodna: May 1 2009, 09:10 AM

But I liked X3, much more than the first two. It was loud and dumb, but the action setpieces were majestic. CGI use was some of the best I've seen. I never really cared about the X-Men stories or the characters, so if this has good action, I'm content.

Looking forward to Star Trek more though. Never watched the series or earlier movies, but the trailer looks good, and I like Abrams

Didnt see Fast and Furious, dont plan to..

But wouldn't you agree that bigger, louder action sequences come with sequels in a package? I mean, it's only logical that Revenge of the Fallen have bigger sequences than Transformers, no?

I'm jumping straight to Salvation, as long as Bale is in it, I'm salivating.

I agree with you as expecting a big blockbuster is near

LOL... never thought of it that way, but yeah that does seem true.

Gambit shouldn't even be in the show... He was just there as fanservice. He didn't have black eyeballs and only a split second of glowing red eyes. But he has the looks and accent though

Both Christian Bale and Hugh Jackman were brilliant in The Prestige, but Wolverine Origins wasted Jackman's talent. Let's just hope that Bale doesn't suffer the fact as Hugh Jackman did.

What I'm saying is that the action in X3 were better than in the first two. Most probably just me though, seeing as how everyone loves the first two. The only character I like in the franchise is Magneto.

Hard to say if Salvation will be good, but its co-written by Jonathan Nolan, so that's something going for it.

So....overall...its just a 'decent' movie, aye?

the movie just meh too me. good for entertainment purpose.

the scene after ending credits is to make way for Deadpool movie that's coming up.