yes model shooting coming up. Make yourself available on 24th Feb. And do check out the Photography section more often
Photography Canon EOS 300D/350D/400D/450D, Go Rebellionz - V2!, DigitalRebel XT/XTi/XSi/KISS Territory!
Photography Canon EOS 300D/350D/400D/450D, Go Rebellionz - V2!, DigitalRebel XT/XTi/XSi/KISS Territory!
|
|
Jan 23 2008, 01:33 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,161 posts Joined: Dec 2006 From: http://www.vincentpang.ws |
wow ! new thread already. Are we the first ?
yes model shooting coming up. Make yourself available on 24th Feb. And do check out the Photography section more often |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 23 2008, 01:45 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,161 posts Joined: Dec 2006 From: http://www.vincentpang.ws |
|
|
|
Jan 23 2008, 10:59 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,161 posts Joined: Dec 2006 From: http://www.vincentpang.ws |
can the nissin be trigger remotely by the 580?
|
|
|
Jan 24 2008, 11:01 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,161 posts Joined: Dec 2006 From: http://www.vincentpang.ws |
OMG i can't believe this joke of the day man
QUOTE(soulfly @ Jan 24 2008, 10:45 PM) Does it really matter? Sony's body focus motor is much faster than Canon's USM... unless silent focusing is your priority. For us, Sony and Minolta users.... lens with built-in focusing mechanism is just a bonus, not a priority. http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/473260/+900#now i'm seriously interested to see some facts on that |
|
|
Jan 24 2008, 11:54 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,161 posts Joined: Dec 2006 From: http://www.vincentpang.ws |
|
|
|
Jan 25 2008, 12:03 AM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,161 posts Joined: Dec 2006 From: http://www.vincentpang.ws |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 25 2008, 12:23 AM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,161 posts Joined: Dec 2006 From: http://www.vincentpang.ws |
QUOTE(yikyeou @ Jan 25 2008, 12:21 AM) i had the same problem with my 50mm f1.8 with cheapo hoya filter. Just take out a while to see if the UV filter is the culprit later u can blow it if there are dust and put the filter back This post has been edited by vincent_audio: Jan 25 2008, 12:24 AM |
|
|
Jan 25 2008, 01:37 AM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,161 posts Joined: Dec 2006 From: http://www.vincentpang.ws |
|
|
|
Jan 25 2008, 01:33 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,161 posts Joined: Dec 2006 From: http://www.vincentpang.ws |
QUOTE(asrolsani @ Jan 25 2008, 09:16 AM) how about if i get these 2 canon lens? the canon 55-250 IS is a good one though... but in your case i will suggest you to take the sigma 18-200 OS which i think is slightly below RM 1700Canon EFS 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 IS Canon EFS 55-250mm F4-5.6 IS quoted for RM1,600 for both lens. worth it? is this lens perform well or not recommended at all.... or maybe take tamron 28-300 VC or sigma 18-200 OS (also RM2,095) need help here |
|
|
Jan 26 2008, 12:33 AM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,161 posts Joined: Dec 2006 From: http://www.vincentpang.ws |
|
|
|
Jan 26 2008, 11:13 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,161 posts Joined: Dec 2006 From: http://www.vincentpang.ws |
QUOTE(sherren @ Jan 26 2008, 09:39 PM) TS pls update 1st page u in penang ar ?350D user sherren - 350D + 18-55mm kit lens, Nissin Speedlite Di622, Lambency Flash Diffuser aiseh, wanted to try to remote trigger the nissin, don't think so can Added on January 26, 2008, 11:14 pm QUOTE(rogerwee @ Jan 26 2008, 11:10 PM) haha... My friend that sold me his sigma 18-200 dcos, now selling me his canon 430EX for rm500.00 . and can pay till end of this month. since I'm dead broke now due to highly cost funeral nowadays yo bro, hope that everything is going smoothly on the funeral.wohooo!! i'm interested at the 430ex if u want to give it a miss. This post has been edited by vincent_audio: Jan 26 2008, 11:14 PM |
|
|
Jan 29 2008, 12:00 AM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,161 posts Joined: Dec 2006 From: http://www.vincentpang.ws |
QUOTE(CutieLynette @ Jan 28 2008, 11:57 PM) LOL, I can't afford the L yet! I'm talking the old old EF 70-210mm f4. The same one fcbarcelona-my is having. I can afford something not over 1k la. you might want to try the 55-250 IS... i tried it and is quite impressed with the lens. for less than RM 800 you should try it out. |
|
|
Jan 29 2008, 08:17 AM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,161 posts Joined: Dec 2006 From: http://www.vincentpang.ws |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 30 2008, 11:00 PM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,161 posts Joined: Dec 2006 From: http://www.vincentpang.ws |
|
|
|
Feb 2 2008, 11:59 PM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,161 posts Joined: Dec 2006 From: http://www.vincentpang.ws |
QUOTE(goldfries @ Feb 2 2008, 10:58 PM) that's the 1st reason you gave when people ask. second that, no doubt for outdoor the sigma 70-300 is a good performer / price ratio. is that the best reason you can come up with? did you know that some reports found that the Sigma 70-300 is the best among low-end tele and the Canon ranks around middle / back of the few lenses compared? anyway my point is. warranty issue is just 1 factor and you're probably the first I've ever come by to tell someone to get a lens just because of warranty issue. c'mon la, there's other issues like build quality and output quality. anyway I've no problem recommending the Sigma 70-300 and Tamron 70-300. they're good low-end tele lenses. well of course the other problem i see is the skin peeling of the sigma coating. Lens is sharp and is up to standard. Those with HSM is silent and fast. I can't think of a bad sigma lens for the moment. Added on February 3, 2008, 12:00 am QUOTE(sherren @ Feb 2 2008, 11:08 PM) Don't know i heard from some people big aperture, fast shutteri know i had a look on the sigma 70-300 i can say its very good as well just that it keeps making me btw the shutter speed and aperture is like a sea saw? i heard before they say aperture big , shutter speed [ ........]? small aperture slower shutter it's always 1/x This post has been edited by vincent_audio: Feb 3 2008, 12:00 AM |
|
|
Feb 3 2008, 11:08 PM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,161 posts Joined: Dec 2006 From: http://www.vincentpang.ws |
QUOTE(yikyeou @ Feb 3 2008, 11:00 PM) i have been searching for lens on the internet this few days. try the sigma 18-200 OS (optical stabilizer)something going in my mind now. tamron 18-250mm F3.5-6.3 AF Di-II LD IF Macro. anybody own this and know about the price? i need more hong bao d. any lens at 1k suitable for use to travel? general purpose lens. atm i also wan a telephoto, but something like the tammy above, it sounds fun. =D the tamron 18-250 doesn't have it and can be quite a challenge when using at 250mm |
|
|
Feb 4 2008, 11:28 AM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,161 posts Joined: Dec 2006 From: http://www.vincentpang.ws |
QUOTE(myjunk @ Feb 3 2008, 11:30 PM) can anyone tell me what is the price of 24-70 2.8L USM in M'sia? It's USD899 here on expresscamera vs 1+k on amazon. US 899 - less than RM 3K.. nice price... that lens cost like more than RM 3500 in KL.Darn it.. now dilemma between the 24-70 2.8L USM (1kg) vs the 70-200 2.8L IS (USD 1129) the 70-200 is so big and heavy, I'm trying to see how often I would take this lens out and say, go snap-snap in 1 Utama if got events there. my 55-250 isn't much usable under low light leh.. That's y the dilemma now. I searched the forum, but don't see any prices on this one lah. it depends on wat u want to shoot. The 24-70 f2.8 definitely doesn't make it if u want to shoot from far low light. If u can go near the subject then the 24-70 f2.8 is a better one. |
|
|
Feb 5 2008, 02:18 AM
Return to original view | Post
#18
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,161 posts Joined: Dec 2006 From: http://www.vincentpang.ws |
|
|
|
Feb 13 2008, 12:37 PM
Return to original view | Post
#19
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,161 posts Joined: Dec 2006 From: http://www.vincentpang.ws |
QUOTE(valho @ Feb 13 2008, 03:39 AM) the one you posted need a battery grip, while this one here doesn't, it's screw to the base of you camera. i have the same one for sale, RM 20. Reason being, under utilised. I use it for like less than 5 times. My hand too small, doesn't grab nicely. |
|
|
Feb 13 2008, 01:35 PM
Return to original view | Post
#20
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,161 posts Joined: Dec 2006 From: http://www.vincentpang.ws |
QUOTE(dazzle @ Feb 13 2008, 01:31 PM) Hi vikingw2k, wat happened to the sigma ? back/front focus ?Pls updated my profile lens. The Sigma 24-70mm change to Tamron 17-50mm. I advise next time dun buy Sigma lens cause the reject rate high compare to the third party lens. Tamron and the Tokina is the best 2 third party lens maker. I try kau kau on the 17-50mm last Monday. Focusing is fast but dunno how fast compare to Canon. But 1 thing, i try canon 24-70mm f2.8 from my friend. This lens very very sharp and fast. I really like it but on budget. Recommend. Pls try the canon 24-70mm lens than u know what is damn sharp and good. yeh the canon 24-70 f2.8 is a great lens, given the price almost double the tamron 17-50 f2.8. Getting the tamron is actually a wise choice if u r on budget. |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0446sec
0.45
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 4th December 2025 - 08:12 PM |