Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Xbox 360 performance equivalent to..?, Xbox 360 vs PC

views
     
Endless9930
post Jan 28 2008, 09:35 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
757 posts

Joined: Aug 2007
TS , how about comparing games ?

Since both plaform have the same game Gears of war , why dont you guys state out what is the min spec that can play the game in high settings with a constant framerate of at least 60?

Since console are made to have 60 FPS , then apply this to pc too

Well , i cant give opinion because i am using 8600 GT with duo core 2.0 , and have the gears running at most at 40 FPS and most of the time drop to 17 FPS

This is indeed playable , but its lag...........

Put aside games like crysis , only focus on games out on both platform

I know people are going to argue about the games on difference platform are totally difference , but whats the point knowing what spec equivalent to 360?

Its the games we are talking about, and surely , even you know that , you will need more juice to play games smoothly on pc even if they are the same game on difference platform.
Endless9930
post Jan 28 2008, 07:18 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
757 posts

Joined: Aug 2007
QUOTE(Demonic Wrath @ Jan 28 2008, 11:13 AM)
I thought GoW on X360 running at 30 FPS?

For X360, Microsoft requires the games to have 30 FPS minimum. So the console is not designed for 60 FPS.

Consoles have fixed HW, so in time the dev will probably optimize what they can put in the games - better coding = better performance.

Anyway, for TS:-
Processor -> Tri-Core Power-PC @ 3.2GHz each w/ 2 threads. Faster than Core 2 Duo, I think.(Notice that current Core2Duo proc has 1 thread for each core only)

GFX: Probably based on ATi 1900XT, but customized with eD-RAM. According to MS, it enables free 4xAA. But in reality, 10 MB of eDRAM is not enough to support 4xAA @ 720p resolution.

RAM: 512MB GDDR3 RAM - less than PC's, hence there's some low-res texture in games. It's used as main RAM and Graphic RAM.
*
Oh is it 30 ?

Because the Modern warfare are said to have constend of 60 on both 360 and ps3 , anyway , we wont see a difference between 30 and 60

Well , the question comes back

What min spec is required to play Gears , Blacksite , Stranglehold etc at min 30 fps?

Well , for those who have 8800 GT , is it enough? or 8800 GTX Sli is needed( I think this is way too high )?

As for ram and the processor etc......
Endless9930
post Jan 28 2008, 07:23 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
757 posts

Joined: Aug 2007
QUOTE(RegentCid @ Jan 22 2008, 11:07 PM)
those console graphic 50% depents GC 50% is depents on CD...dun forget xbox 360 is using HD-DVD!...HD-DVD is 50% more clear than DVD....Even Xbox 360 is using Nvidia7900XT as GC...result out also same as 8800GTS.....WHen i play Ghost Recon Advance Warfighter...in Xbox graphic = PC Very high setting (PC i used 8800GTS SLI result = same graphic to Xbox 360 HD-DVD result)
PS3...DO it got GC..i tell u it dun have.....WHY PS3 graphic so so Pretty?

PS3 using 8 Extreme Processor (Normal PC is 5Ghz super max OC with nitrogen liquid) But PS3 Processor is 20GHZ=2Trilion per second speed without OC MEANS 8X20 GHZ = 160GHZ PROCESSOR in PS3!!!!! plus using Blue-Ray Disk...150% more clear view than DVD....PS3 no GC but result same to 8800Ultra Triple SLI result (Do u guys see Grand Tusimo newest one? play games like see a Movie...SO SO  real....Even 8800ultra triple SLi also cannot do that maybe.......
Back to X-box 360....it using HD-DVD and x-box processor is 1 trilion per second speed...means 10Ghz Processor without OC....so PC how to beat those console ? Console no need GC at all using it processor power can make ur games see very nice and Very Fast!!!

DO u see Console games make u lag before? LOL!!!!
Conclusion:Console gaming they no depents on GC they used quality on HD-DVD or Blue Ray Disk to win PC......and Processor too~~~

Here the Link to let u see :PS3 power
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EwCDhMJ6-r4&feature=related

Console Graphic Tech is far more higher than PC graphic setting.......
*
Well , what he said is not entirely wrong

Storage is a factor for gaming.

More storage means we can store higher resolution texture , better sound etc , therefore the outcome is better.

I understand why he said that , because i have seen the video provided , and it is a little bit of misleading for noob .....

Anyway , as long as the processors can handle the job , the graphic will be nice biggrin.gif
Endless9930
post Jan 29 2008, 07:37 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
757 posts

Joined: Aug 2007
QUOTE(Demonic Wrath @ Jan 28 2008, 09:04 PM)
Lol, how can I miss that post..

Anyway, X360 doesn't use HD-DVD as their storage for games. It's still using DVD.
*
Ya , for the time being.

Anyway , a dvd 9 is enough for most games.
Endless9930
post Feb 6 2008, 09:27 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
757 posts

Joined: Aug 2007
QUOTE(arafat @ Feb 1 2008, 11:38 AM)
games for xbox are catered specifically for them
but for pc, developer goes for latest tech
u cant really compare pc & xbox
*
Well , not really

If you compare games that made for both platform , i think this is a good way to compare

For an example , gears of war...

What is the min spec to play GOW smoothly with the same graphic settings? And with the same resolution?

I think this is the best way to compare , of course , we are considering other games as well , such as blacksite , stranglehold etc...
« Next Oldest · Hardware · Next Newest »
 

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
 0.0194sec    0.60    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 26th November 2025 - 02:03 PM
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Removal Request
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025  IPS, Inc.