Your fren must be a retard. Since your opponent is using map hack, then you know that your opponents are faggots and losers so why U actually have to resort to using violence. It is only a dota game and your friend want to fxxx up his life over it. If you ask me, that is really retarded. So what is your friend trying to proof here. That your friend has no ability in dota and thus has to use violence to settle this? I really do not understand this barbaric mentality. Maybe your friend is fxxx up in the first place.

Actually, just because ppl diam does not mean they are scared of your friend. Just that they are smart in understanding that it is not worth messing up their life over a dota game. If you cannot stand ppl being lcly then dun play dota that's all.

I have a similar case yesterday. I was playing with a retard and the question that i posted was which lane was pa in. PA level seems to be really high etc. It was like i was level 6 or 7 and that pa was level 10 or something. One person( sladar) had to tell me that it is in his lane so wat does it proof. Well I told him that it just proof that you are a noob for letting pa gain such high level. He said that the last time pa had the same level as him.  Then i look at the number of death versus kill ratio and i ask him why u feed so much, you must be a noob for doing that. Then of course this guy said tat i am a noob then i said u are a noob for dying too much.  Then he ask me if i am looking for trouble and if i am just go outside and settle. I just told that person that he sux in dota because he has to resort to fighting to get what he wants. After that he went looking for me and found my table and ask me what is wrong with me. I did not keep silent and in fact i just kept telling him to play his game. I did not want to fight with him but at the same time i dun want to give him the impression that just because he is threatening me, I am scared of him. He said i do not look happy then i just keep on repeating play your game and after that he got back to his pc and called me *****. I was not scared of him because my friend was there but i do not want to court trouble that's all.

So if you think you are somebody just because you have to resort to violence to achieve something think again. Just because someone is quiet does not mean that he is scared of you. Just that he is smarter then you and dun want to mess  up his life just because of a dota game. If you cannot handle insults then dun touch the game that's all.

---

Added on June 13, 2009, 1:20 pm

Nice losers are never winners. To me CS is not as engrossing as dota. How long does a cs match takes. A few minutes. Do you think that say you are a good cs player a bad cs noob can mess up your game? I think there isn't a real winner in cs. It is only about how good you are that is. Not to say that no tactics is involved. I am sure that at high level tactics are involved but in cc level, I dun see any tactics at all. It is just all about intuition.

A dota game is about 45 mins to 1.5 hours long. It involves a high level of coordination as well as tactics and strategy etc. There are a lot of parameters. Your whole team can play well and still lose because you forgot about nullifying the PAs, the TROLLs, the LUNA,SPRECTREs of the other team. I guess it is quite intense and thus ppl do get emotional over this because of the intense level. So of coz when things get emotional, ppl will tend to use very harsh words on each other. But of coz, if things get to carried away and ppl fight then those ppl who initiated the fight are really dummies and have shown that they are noobs becoz of their inability they have to resort to threats to get wat they want.

---

Added on June 13, 2009, 2:21 pm

In dota, you have to adapt to all situation. There is no such things as solo players or team players. Even if you are the carry, you still have to work as a team. You still have to ensure that if your teammate is in trouble, you have to help him if you are sure that you are not going to die. If you are just a team player or even a solo player, then i guess you are not a good player. Even as a team player, you have to ensure that you farm whenever the opportunity arises because you are going to be useless late game if you just participate in ganks.

After some games, we shake hands normally & go drink beer...  

So what does that imply. 30 rounds. Say if 1 lose to you 10-20. Does that make you a better player? Maybe the extra 5 games that you won is becoz of luck. That is why i do not really think that games like snooker can be considered a real sport. Come on. 9 rounds just to decide a winner. So if someone wins 5-4, can i say that this person is better then the other? I dun deny that cs require team work and tactics but it is at a lesser level. If you have been playing  just the few particular maps for months, i doubt you do not get familiar with the map after a few months. Once you are familiar, then you can talk about strategy and tactics which is not that difficult once you get the map rite.  I dun see how a game which just requires positioning, accuracy and perhaps a little tactics can be considered mind blowing. I got bored of playing cs after just a few weaks. But dota is a different story.

You cannot judge tactics and team work in such simple ways.

Note that I personally hate both DotA and CS so please do not think that I'm defending CS or attacking DotA or whatever it is.  I'm just responding because we are talking about intangible things, and the way you're downplaying CS makes it seem like you want to start an argument. 

They're not even the same kind of game.  Different skills and strategies and tactics are cultivated and retained in different games.  It's like if I were to say that people racing Nascar sucked because "all you do" is hitting the accelerator and turning left, or that basketball sucks because they take too many breaks.

Also, your snooker analogy is flawed.  Winning 5-4 equates to beating someone ONE time in snooker (or pool, or tennis, etc).  If you beat a team in DotA ONE time, does that mean your team is definitely, totally, undisputably better than the other?  Never mind that they may have made a human error and forgot to consider one of those aspects you outlined?

Don't be so biased man.