what can i say ....i used virtualbox.org , as the apps are running fine and no lagging
but if you have more RAM , 2 gig above ...just use either fusion or parallel
Desktop Parallels 3.0 Vs. VMware Fusion 1.1, Which one better and why?
|
|
 Jan 4 2008, 01:25 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Senior Member
2,939 posts Joined: Oct 2004 From: localhost  
|
|
Quote|
|
Jan 4 2008, 03:05 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member
2,939 posts Joined: Oct 2004 From: localhost
|
QUOTE(Balok @ Jan 4 2008, 02:50 PM) you can try the demo version at apple website and decide for yourself maybe it only works on Tiger , at this moment .  @kevler, virtualbox.org? the beta one ka? i try use it but it does not respond la.   for Leopard ..u need to wait for sometimes ,as they are working on this matter . p/s my MBP still running Tiger ...wargggghhhhh ( tiger's roar)  |
|
|
Jan 6 2008, 11:45 AM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member
2,939 posts Joined: Oct 2004 From: localhost
|
QUOTE(belango @ Jan 6 2008, 11:35 AM) yes, but it depends again... for me, i use leopard 99% n window 1% (transfer files to friends' ext HDD (NTFS format))...so i dont need parallel features that much...on top of that, vm startup is faster than parallel... actually , from what i know , Bill Pagar get his idea for GUI ,from Xerox company. At that time , Apple Lisa still lack of icon. i try as much as i can to avoid windows..huhu...(bill gates ciplak all the GUI from mac back then) Below is the Xerox desktop  above of all , Bill Pagar still copy-cat other ppl's masterpiece . This post has been edited by kevler: Jan 6 2008, 11:46 AM |
| Change to: |  0.0421sec
 0.83
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 21st December 2025 - 08:16 AM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.