Desktop Parallels 3.0 Vs. VMware Fusion 1.1, Which one better and why?
|
|
 Jan 5 2008, 07:25 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Junior Member
43 posts Joined: Aug 2006  
|
QUOTE(vetkin_gray @ Jan 5 2008, 06:30 PM) lol, P version and ahem version are the same thing... poor you don understand what we're saying.. i m using ahem versions on my macbook GMA950...  both parallel n fusion....but i am happy with fusion after few months and i uninstalled parallel... although there are some features that parallel has which fusion has not... |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 6 2008, 11:35 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Junior Member
43 posts Joined: Aug 2006
|
QUOTE(allvin @ Jan 5 2008, 07:35 PM) Yea.. Parallels features like read/write your vhdd without booting in your virtualization software and it allows to open either mac application or windows application. yes, but it depends again... for me, i use leopard 99% n window 1% (transfer files to friends' ext HDD (NTFS format))...so i dont need parallel features that much...on top of that, vm startup is faster than parallel...i try as much as i can to avoid windows..huhu...(bill gates ciplak all the GUI from mac back then) |
|
|
Jan 6 2008, 05:49 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Junior Member
43 posts Joined: Aug 2006
|
good artists copy
great artists steal |
|
|
Jan 7 2008, 12:49 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
Junior Member
43 posts Joined: Aug 2006
|
it depends on how you want to use it....
i suggest install both trial version and test them by yourselves |
| Change to: |  0.0460sec
 1.10
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 20th December 2025 - 01:13 PM |
Quote