The Quad Core "Advantage"?, Quad vs Dual core in the REAL world
|
|
 Jan 3 2008, 11:01 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Senior Member
4,810 posts Joined: Jan 2003   
|
For those who keep on saying that dual core is enough and quad core hasn't been utilised yet....
 It's the best chip for both non-overclocker and overclocker under rm1k.  QUOTE Comparing the E6750 and the Q6600 at default clock speeds, we see the quad-core CPU outperform its sibling by an average of 3.8% across our benchmark suite.  QUOTE When both CPUs are overclocked to their limit, the quad-core extends its lead to 5.3%.  read more here: http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/11/08/dual_vs_quad/ This post has been edited by sukhoi37: Jan 3 2008, 11:02 PM |
|
|
Jan 5 2008, 09:41 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member
4,810 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
repost due to image link problem.
  source from here http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/11/08/dua...uad/page20.html the winner is clear.  |
|
|
Jan 5 2008, 02:22 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member
4,810 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(HMMaster @ Jan 5 2008, 11:48 AM) but the E6750 is cheaper ya, but q6600 G0 has better ocibility. it would be better if they compare E6850 with Q6600. QUOTE(kmarc @ Jan 5 2008, 12:03 PM) Mana ade? It is not that straight forward. hmm...quite true.If you look at that table, quad is good for video and 3D rendering but lose out on games and office apps. Disadvantage is quad is about rm300 more expensive and it is hotter, requiring better cooling for equivalent overclocks..... In the end, it depends on what apps you use....... i see the chart wrongly... |
| Change to: |  0.0430sec
 0.89
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 19th December 2025 - 05:24 AM |
Quote