The Quad Core "Advantage"?, Quad vs Dual core in the REAL world
|
|
 May 13 2008, 10:04 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
All Stars
14,909 posts Joined: Jul 2005  
|
QUOTE(tech3910 @ May 13 2008, 10:02 PM) dis is b cause q9450 has less cache den 6600.............. Wrong.try 9550 insted........... Dude, stop posting nuts again and again. Q9450 losses to Q6600 in overclocking is because of low multiplier, not because of the cache. Cache has nothing to do with overclocking. This post has been edited by sHawTY: May 13 2008, 10:09 PM |
|
|
May 14 2008, 01:19 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
All Stars
14,909 posts Joined: Jul 2005
|
QUOTE(tech3910 @ May 13 2008, 10:24 PM) multiplier & cache both is essential in OC......... ROFLMAOBBQSAUCESTALEMARSHMALLOWS Stop talking nonsense before you hurt yourself. Cache has nothing to do with overclocking. If you're not sure about something, ask, don't make up stupid assumptions like that. |
|
|
May 15 2008, 12:39 AM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
All Stars
14,909 posts Joined: Jul 2005
|
QUOTE(tech3910 @ May 14 2008, 11:26 PM) quad is generally clocked @ lower speed den dual........ Stop talking crap already.by comparison, it can reach higher oc percentage compared 2 n already high clock speed dual core.......... generally speaking also, quad tend 2 kick dual core ass wen both r OC 2 da max....... Dude, i don't want to say this but, you don't know anything. So stop acting like you know everything already. Have you ever looked at the highest overclocked e6600? Someone managed to overclock an E6600 to 4.5GHz, but the maximum a Q6600 can do is only 4GHz, and that's very rare. While there are a lot of E6600 that can do 4GHz. E6600 & Q6600 is on the same clock speed and they has the same number of multiplier and they have the same FSB and bus speed. |
| Change to: |  0.0570sec
 0.95
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 19th December 2025 - 08:56 AM |
Quote