This will be my first time writing a review. Comments/critics are welcome.
(mods pls merge the thread if it's inappropriate to stand by itself)
I've noticed that the IFX-14 performs worse than my BTVX . Posted a query in lyn click here (post 322) and query about the performance. Take note of the date of post and the load temp on IFX, that was the recorded temp on freshly applied AS5. After making good use of the WWW, I concluded that the culprit was the uneven base. I decided to give my IFX a handjob (lap).
7 different grades of sandpaper is used. 240, 400, 600, 800, 1000, 1500 & 2000 grit. Here's the specs and app used to compare the results of lapped vs unlapped;
Processor
Intel Q6600 G0 L734Bxxx
333mhz x 9 @ 1.30vcore (pencil-ed, no vdroop)
Apps used
Stress Prime 2004 v0.40.95.13 @ Small FFTs - stress CPU, Priority 1
Speedfan v4.32
Everest Ultimate v4.00.976
RivaTuner v2.06
Below are the items used for the lapping;
Coffee table used as flat glass
Half cup of dish detergent mixed with water + straw
1 x optimus prime (optional)
7 grades of sandpaper (as above)
Wifey's nail polish remover
AS5
Those are not beers, it's dish detergent + water used to smoothen the friction during lap

After I removed the IFX from the mobo, the way of the paste spreaded was expected; least concentration of paste at the center and swept to the sides.

A closer look at the paste effect from unlapped IFX.

This is how the paste effect from the IFX base after removed from mobo. Noticed that the base too has a thinner concentration at the center.

After removing the paste using the nail polish remover. Noticed that it's cut using a machine and it has got a dull reflection.

This post has been edited by VT-Ten: Dec 30 2007, 01:57 AM
Dec 30 2007, 01:53 AM, updated 18y ago
Quote



















0.0214sec
0.92
6 queries
GZIP Disabled