Intel® Celeron® M Processor 540 (1.86 GHz, 1MB Cache, 533 MHz FSB)

Intel® Core™2 Duo Processor T5270 (1.4GHz, 2MB Cache, 800 MHz FSB)


-------------------

want to ask... is there significant difference?

The price differs at RM 172. Worth the upgrade to C2D though 1.4ghz?

Its low end single core processor compare to mid end dual core processor.

Its different hell lot even you compare Pentium M.

Just take the C2D lar...afterall its just about RM 200. More cache means you can open programs faster. Correct me if im wrong

Very big diffrent...FSB from 533 to 800mhz is big big diffrent already.....

most obvious is taht its a dual core vs a single core

which performs better?


ps* Pentium D's are not included in my statement above

both are mobile processors,
btw, celeronM is pentiumM right?

well.. in windows.. more processors are always more better... depending on what u use it for..

if ur planning just to surf, word processing, mp3, dvd, then celeron can also do.

but since the price difference is small.. i would recommend u get dual core

anyway, did a bit of searching
found out that the celeron M 5xx , are c2d Merom based.
and super pi seems faster than the T5270.

its faster due to the clock speed. but that is for super pi
why not fire-up 3dmark or h264 encoding to see if it shines or not?