Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
5 Pages « < 2 3 4 5 >Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 [Review]Some Thermalpaste Tested, TX-2,MX-2,MX-1,AS-5,Stock

views
     
intothefantasy
post Dec 28 2007, 04:18 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,561 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: Penang island
iyo u all pity ace mei mei la..she just only 11 years old trying to contribute to hardware information ma lol....btw ace mei mei surely done a great review or might say a rough review which gives us the ideas on choosing which thermal paste in the future
clawhammer
post Dec 28 2007, 04:33 AM

///M
Group Icon
VIP
8,788 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur




QUOTE(intothefantasy @ Dec 28 2007, 04:18 AM)
iyo u all pity ace mei mei la..she just only 11 years old trying to contribute to hardware information ma lol....btw ace mei mei surely done a great review or might say a rough review which gives us the ideas on choosing which thermal paste in the future
*
I have to agree on this. AceCombat is just doing a favour and sharing thoughts by comparing several thermal compounds and the results. It definitely wouldn't be a very precise one and if it need be, someone would have to do all these in a proper laboratory. I've seen many reviews with different ambient temp when different results were taken from review sites to Xtreme forum members, etc over the years. I don't think its much of an issue and reviews are something that gives you a brief overview of the product, not a scientific yet accurate conclusion. Plus, not all reviews are true and correct.

For someone like AceCombat that doesn't mind taking the time to swap, clean and test all those thermal compounds, credits should be given and for those that would like to have precise measurements, please go borrow a lab from NASA or whoever and complete a good review for everyone of us here in LY.net biggrin.gif
omara86
post Dec 28 2007, 04:54 AM

0mg nicotine juice
*****
Senior Member
707 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: Island of Borneo
because of this thread... i bought Tunix TX-2 together with my Mini Typhoon... so far so good... X2 6000+ 3.0GHz... OCed to 3.51GHz on max vcore, 1.5++... dont really remember.. while running SuperPI.. temp is around 49C - 51C... thumbup.gif thumbup.gif
clayclws
post Dec 28 2007, 06:18 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,659 posts

Joined: Sep 2006
From: Miri, PJ & KL


QUOTE(intothefantasy @ Dec 28 2007, 04:18 AM)
iyo u all pity ace mei mei la..she just only 11 years old trying to contribute to hardware information ma lol....btw ace mei mei surely done a great review or might say a rough review which gives us the ideas on choosing which thermal paste in the future
*
Man...these cracks me up...

This post has been edited by clayclws: Dec 28 2007, 06:18 AM
a1098113
post Dec 28 2007, 10:24 AM

~Retired~
*******
Senior Member
3,119 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Home


QUOTE(lichyetan @ Dec 28 2007, 04:09 AM)
i think there will be errors in any test or experiment, so basically i think the 1c difference couldnt make any difference as errors in measurements can be classified as:
Gross errors
Instrumental Errors
Environmental Errors
Observational Errors
So, @acecombat, i think if really wanted to test out accurately who is the winner, u need to control the ambient temperature, ur measuring sensors and so on... but i think it is impossible to get accurate temp as the onboard sensors also got some measurements errors, depends on its sensitivity, so i think the +-1c difference is acceptable la... but if 2c above then should be identical la, which is the best... best u can do is get 99% accurate measurements, but that will cost u to buy ur own high end temperature sensors. This is just my opinion, haha.... btw, good review there, make us know which thermalpaste to choose in future notworthy.gif  notworthy.gif  notworthy.gif
*
well, i have a few to say here, this boy here has taken his time and all his effort to give us this results. By the way in experimental terminology there can be two errors, one is relative error and the other instrumental error.

In malaysia, there is no need for an ambient temperature reading to the fact that he is running the test on level ground to most of us, and in Malaysia. Given the fact that he did not use Air condition to run this test, is already a clear assumption that ambient temperature is used. In any experimental instrument, there is always calibration, thus a method to reduce relative and instrumental errors, in this sense he is not using meters, he is using on board sensors, that are in a way, calibrated.

The point is, in computers, a 1 degree decrease does make a difference, and also remember that there wasnt any curing done, So i can expect a bigger variance between the two or more thermal paste. If you are rich enough, or anyone here is rich enough to sponsor this boy to run test, then it would do good, but since no one is even helping, this review is roughly taken as a benchmark test la.


TSAceCombat
post Dec 28 2007, 11:10 AM


Group Icon
Elite
5,434 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


QUOTE(lolhalol @ Dec 28 2007, 03:08 AM)
@acecombat

ur fangrill ill pm u  in a bit...
anyway im not saying u did wrong lah... but when review TIM it is alwayas subjective one.. especially when idle temps come into play... coz a slight suden gust of cold wind into ur room cna make it drop 1 degree.... but still as i said solid review
*
laugh.gif must get discount liao,so long time liao.
anyway,i did this review with totally in very hot condition,no fan,balcony closed,door all closed,so that's mean i just use the isolated air in my living hall to make the ambient temeparature even for every test,even i also sweating over there due to quite hot laugh.gif


QUOTE(clawhammer @ Dec 28 2007, 03:31 AM)
If you enjoy modding and wanted to get the best out of everything, you can always give it a shot and try lapping biggrin.gif
*
notworthy.gif argee with u,but sadly the fatal1ty come with mirror finished....

QUOTE(lichyetan @ Dec 28 2007, 04:09 AM)
i think there will be errors in any test or experiment, so basically i think the 1c difference couldnt make any difference as errors in measurements can be classified as:
Gross errors
Instrumental Errors
Environmental Errors
Observational Errors
So, @acecombat, i think if really wanted to test out accurately who is the winner, u need to control the ambient temperature, ur measuring sensors and so on... but i think it is impossible to get accurate temp as the onboard sensors also got some measurements errors, depends on its sensitivity, so i think the +-1c difference is acceptable la... but if 2c above then should be identical la, which is the best... best u can do is get 99% accurate measurements, but that will cost u to buy ur own high end temperature sensors. This is just my opinion, haha.... btw, good review there, make us know which thermalpaste to choose in future notworthy.gif  notworthy.gif  notworthy.gif
*
i always make sure all the temp are correct,if u want me to prove,i can prove to u what is the environment looks like and how it has been done.i use onboard sensor for EVERY test,so the result will difinitely be accurated compared to others,anyway,no one sponsor me high end stuff,i fork out my daily pocket money to buy all those things that make th review sad.gif

QUOTE(clawhammer @ Dec 28 2007, 04:33 AM)
I have to agree on this. AceCombat is just doing a favour and sharing thoughts by comparing several thermal compounds and the results. It definitely wouldn't be a very precise one and if it need be, someone would have to do all these in a proper laboratory. I've seen many reviews with different ambient temp when different results were taken from review sites to Xtreme forum members, etc over the years. I don't think its much of an issue and reviews are something that gives you a brief overview of the product, not a scientific yet accurate conclusion. Plus, not all reviews are true and correct.

For someone like AceCombat that doesn't mind taking the time to swap, clean and test all those thermal compounds, credits should be given and for those that would like to have precise measurements, please go borrow a lab from NASA or whoever and complete a good review for everyone of us here in LY.net biggrin.gif
*
thanks for ur support bro,anyway,it took me a long time just to make this short review,cause i used a 3dmark06 run to make the core hot and try to sink the paste for a test,(around 15 minutes) then have to wait to take idle temp and so on,not easy,but as long as i can share with u guys,it's good to hear that u guys make up ur mind to get what thermalpaste that u like thumbup.gif
anyway,i wish i do have a lab cry.gif

QUOTE(omara86 @ Dec 28 2007, 04:54 AM)
because of this thread... i bought Tunix TX-2 together with my Mini Typhoon... so far so good... X2 6000+ 3.0GHz... OCed to 3.51GHz on max vcore, 1.5++... dont really remember.. while running SuperPI.. temp is around 49C - 51C...  thumbup.gif  thumbup.gif
*
suicide run shocking.gif shocking.gif

QUOTE(clayclws @ Dec 28 2007, 06:18 AM)
Man...these cracks me up...
*
wub.gif hope u dont mind i just a 11 years old little girl.

QUOTE(a1098113 @ Dec 28 2007, 10:24 AM)
well, i have a few to say here, this boy here has taken his time and all his effort to give us this results. By the way in experimental terminology there can be two errors, one is relative error and the other instrumental error.

In malaysia, there is no need for an ambient temperature reading to the fact that he is running the test on level ground to most of us, and in Malaysia. Given the fact that he did not use Air condition to run this test, is already a clear assumption that ambient temperature is used. In any experimental instrument, there is always calibration, thus a method to reduce relative and instrumental errors, in this sense he is not using meters, he is using on board sensors, that are in a way, calibrated.

The point is, in computers, a 1 degree decrease does make a difference, and also remember that there wasnt any curing done, So i can expect a bigger variance between the two or more thermal paste. If you are rich enough, or anyone here is rich enough to sponsor this boy to run test, then it would do good, but since no one is even helping, this review is roughly taken as a benchmark test la.
*
thanks bro!!!!
thanks for support me!!!
more review coming soon if u have enough budget.
LittleLinnet
post Dec 28 2007, 01:30 PM

Iophobia
*******
Senior Member
3,593 posts

Joined: Feb 2005
From: ***Penang***
QUOTE(lolhalol @ Dec 28 2007, 12:53 AM)
@acecombat

i dont think there is a clear winner actually... not to cucuk ur review or anything. but that one degree on idle doesnt mean it will be beter..... could have been a slight human error.. or just that extra too much paste.. or too little.. we may never know.. but solid review anyways..
*
i kinda agree this. And some paste does need some time to settle in to actually get better temp.

Btw, Ace, i wonder how you take the temperature ?
highest temp or??
Like MX-2 53C, but the graph there seems like does went up like 54C or maybe 55C
darude87
post Dec 28 2007, 01:34 PM

hhhoooiii!!!
******
Senior Member
1,412 posts

Joined: Jun 2005


all results only differ by a bit, i'm wondering AS5 after sinking time, will it outperform the rest hmm.gif cause i'm thinking of getting either AS5 or MX2
Oxburg
post Dec 28 2007, 01:37 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
857 posts

Joined: Feb 2007


QUOTE(clawhammer @ Dec 28 2007, 03:48 AM)
I don't think anything is free and everything comes with a price. As I say, if one is interested in modding and an enthusiast, the few ringgit of sandpaper is not a lot compared to the success and satisfaction out of it.
*
BTW i asked alot ppl about lapping story.Beside our successful story in forum, alot ppl suffering from unbalanced surface after lapping.Then the performance is drop drastically.So other then spending money on material, time, we risk our heatsink also = =
bulibulizaimon
post Dec 28 2007, 01:46 PM

PSN : bulibulizaimon
*******
Senior Member
4,667 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: UniVeRSiTy Of MaLaYa



This Tuniq TX-2, any idea how many times can be used?
ongbs
post Dec 28 2007, 02:38 PM

Who am I ?
******
Senior Member
1,083 posts

Joined: Sep 2004
Thumbs up for little combat brader! thumbup.gif thumbup.gif thumbup.gif

btw, what is the Tuniq TX-2 net weight per pack? 4g ah?

This post has been edited by ongbs: Dec 28 2007, 02:41 PM
ir1z
post Dec 28 2007, 02:56 PM

The God of Death
******
Senior Member
1,629 posts

Joined: Dec 2007
From: Heaven and Hell



QUOTE(ongbs @ Dec 28 2007, 02:38 PM)
Thumbs up for little combat brader!  thumbup.gif  thumbup.gif  thumbup.gif

btw, what is the Tuniq TX-2 net weight per pack? 4g ah?
*
it is at 3.5g as pic shown below

user posted image
look at bottom

This post has been edited by ir1z: Dec 28 2007, 03:00 PM
lichyetan
post Dec 28 2007, 03:06 PM

*****
*******
Senior Member
2,295 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Penang



haha, yeah its a good review, i just wanted to mention we cant get 100% accuracy in any test, tht's all... yeah i respect acecombats contribution to the forums by sharing info among us, make me put the tx-2 at the top of the list if i gonna purchase thermalpaste in the future...
herojack41
post Dec 28 2007, 03:21 PM

Master Of Trouble Maker
*******
Senior Member
5,697 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: A Place Where God And Master Of TroubleMaker Exist



yayaya....my fault my fault sorry then,btw dun luan luan call ppl noob vmad.gif

This post has been edited by herojack41: Dec 28 2007, 03:22 PM
Oxburg
post Dec 28 2007, 03:27 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
857 posts

Joined: Feb 2007


Even got 1 celcius devation also not bad.The price alredi killed the MX-2.
clawhammer
post Dec 28 2007, 06:00 PM

///M
Group Icon
VIP
8,788 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur




QUOTE(Oxburg @ Dec 28 2007, 01:37 PM)
BTW i asked alot ppl about lapping story.Beside our successful story in forum, alot ppl suffering from unbalanced surface after lapping.Then the performance is drop drastically.So other then spending money on material, time, we risk our heatsink also = =
*
Well, it's just a suggestion. Plus, I can't conclusive say lapping would always give better temps too smile.gif
The bottom line is, if you're unsure and not confident on what you're doing, don't do it.
Thunderbolt
post Dec 28 2007, 07:36 PM

Tonight We Dine In Penang!
******
Senior Member
1,191 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: Penang


QUOTE(herojack41 @ Dec 28 2007, 03:21 PM)
yayaya....my fault my fault sorry then,btw dun luan luan call ppl noob vmad.gif
*

Ditto! laugh.gif
TSAceCombat
post Dec 28 2007, 08:23 PM


Group Icon
Elite
5,434 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


QUOTE(herojack41 @ Dec 28 2007, 03:21 PM)
yayaya....my fault my fault sorry then,btw dun luan luan call ppl noob vmad.gif
*
laugh.gif laugh.gif laugh.gif laugh.gif laugh.gif
u have 3 stars here still dont know what is reserved post,anyway,sorry for everything.
notworthy.gif notworthy.gif notworthy.gif notworthy.gif notworthy.gif
zeustronic
post Dec 28 2007, 08:28 PM

Retire OC Into Audiophiles
*******
Senior Member
2,605 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
From: A Place Between Heaven & Hell


QUOTE(a1098113 @ Dec 28 2007, 11:24 AM)
well, i have a few to say here, this boy here has taken his time and all his effort to give us this results. By the way in experimental terminology there can be two errors, one is relative error and the other instrumental error.

In malaysia, there is no need for an ambient temperature reading to the fact that he is running the test on level ground to most of us, and in Malaysia. Given the fact that he did not use Air condition to run this test, is already a clear assumption that ambient temperature is used. In any experimental instrument, there is always calibration, thus a method to reduce relative and instrumental errors, in this sense he is not using meters, he is using on board sensors, that are in a way, calibrated.

The point is, in computers, a 1 degree decrease does make a difference, and also remember that there wasnt any curing done, So i can expect a bigger variance between the two or more thermal paste. If you are rich enough, or anyone here is rich enough to sponsor this boy to run test, then it would do good, but since no one is even helping, this review is roughly taken as a benchmark test la.
*
Thermal paste showed no much difference, if demand lower temp., change a better will makes more difference.

@AceGirly
aiks using P5K Premium d? Wut think bout the board?

This post has been edited by zeustronic: Dec 28 2007, 08:37 PM
herojack41
post Dec 28 2007, 10:48 PM

Master Of Trouble Maker
*******
Senior Member
5,697 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: A Place Where God And Master Of TroubleMaker Exist



QUOTE(AceCombat @ Dec 28 2007, 08:23 PM)
laugh.gif  laugh.gif  laugh.gif  laugh.gif  laugh.gif
u have 3 stars here still dont know what is reserved post,anyway,sorry for everything.
notworthy.gif  notworthy.gif  notworthy.gif  notworthy.gif  notworthy.gif
*
brother....i just joined this forum 1 months only shakehead.gif ,i duno this forum got booking 1 doh.gif doh.gif

This post has been edited by herojack41: Dec 28 2007, 10:49 PM

5 Pages « < 2 3 4 5 >Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0244sec    0.85    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 23rd December 2025 - 03:48 AM