QUOTE(maxchua @ Nov 2 2009, 01:11 PM)
Its been long since i graduated, but i remembered some theory i studied in economic class, saying that a company is best 100% leveraged, thus you dont have to invest anything to get returns. because of the ROE thingy...if i remember correctly.
As for Digi, i think its still in its expansion phase, thus needing a certain amount of cash to do so. But from their actions, you can see that they know what their existing investors want which is High dividend, without this high payout, they are afraid that their shares might tank. Thus they are thinking of ways to increase or maintain their share price by giving out more dividends due to competition (maxis).
If you were to ask if they are doing the right thing to increase leverage in times like this and if its a wise choice to borrow money to pay shareholders, ..... i dont know, only time will tell. I like digi as a whole, but the current share price is too high for me to swallow. Shareholders should be quite happy to hear that they are getting more dividend regardless of where the funds are coming from ....hahahaha....as long as not from the shareholder's pockets (rights issue).
First thing for sure, right issue is the most unfavorable to investors, as instead of getting the dividends from the company, the company now slaughter you to get more money...... which eventually is diluting the shares you possess for the company.....
but on the other hand, i would not think that gearing or leveraging loan for company working capitals, as whatever the company earns, at the end also need to pay the interest on the loans taken..., so this sure will eating up the profits for the companies...., where as when a company is in a net cash, with appropriate working capitals, it generates profits...and the profits will directly contributing to EPS...and eventually all profits will be shares among the investors as dividends etc....
another point is by paying high dividends, could it be the parent company who controls most of the shares wanted to squeeze the "juice" or money out from the child companies (one this child companies) already achieve a stable business....and this probably the time, for parent company to get more or get the continuous returns from the child companies..and one of the way is through a continuous high dividend policy comittment ...this will ensure...the parent company will get all the profits from the child company.... am i righti in this sense... ?
unless the debts taken hold a very minimum interest rate then that would be a very "cheap" working capitals.......
question, which is the company you would buy or possess.....
1. A Well Established company with net cash, high profits, high dividends
2. A Well Established company with high debts, high profits, high dividends
3. A Growth company with net cash, high profits, low dividends
4. A Growth company with high debts, low profits or making lost with zero dividends
Added on November 2, 2009, 10:14 pmQUOTE(cherroy @ Nov 2 2009, 03:44 PM)
Theory always remain as theory.
The theory of stock market is even simple -> buy low, sell high. So easy one, what so difficult to make money in stock market?
Leverage is double edge sword, high leverage company can grow fast, but if stumble, everthing gone overnight. Bankers that provide you the leverage can pull the plug if situation changed. Just like last year crisis, lot of company cannot refinance their debt, eventually went down.
If company is borrowing money to pay dividend, I can assure the stock will plunge, as investors are not stupid, if the company is not making profit while still giving dividend through borrowing, it won't be sustainable, it can be seen through their financial report as well.
As indeed, buying low and selling high is the most fundamental strategy, but yet, how many of us doing that.....
when market bearish, everyone is selling and even with good opportunity to buy into a good value company at decent price, i would doubt that everyone will say "wait for it to go lower, then can get a good bargain"....
and when markets turn to bullish, everyone is buying and chasing stocks like mad, and everyone scare of missing the boats and eventually buy at higher price for any counters they are chasing..and most of them will hope that it gonna go higher and higher, the sentiment is so great, until people will buy into company that never generate any profits before...but due to hot market, people all blindly "invest"................
So borrowing money to pay dividends is not a good strategy......... by right borrowing money at a very reasonable interest rate, is meant for business expansion, re-finance high interest debts, then that would considered a good strategy..... am i right?.................................. so far any company borrow money to pay dividends.... ????? I wonder....
This post has been edited by Kamen Rider: Nov 2 2009, 10:19 PM